Suppr超能文献

ADA 检测中的单份分析:比较双份和单份检测形式的检测性能。

Singlicate analysis in ADA assays: comparing assay performance in duplicate and singlicate formats.

作者信息

Jiang Zhihua

机构信息

Pharmacokinetics, Dynamics and Metabolism, Pfizer Inc, Andover, MA, USA.

出版信息

Bioanalysis. 2025 Mar;17(5):371-377. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2464421. Epub 2025 Feb 11.

Abstract

Singlicate anti-drug antibody (ADA) analysis is gaining recognition as a promising approach to optimize immunogenicity assessment. It offers significant benefits in terms of cost-effectiveness and aligns with patient-centric principles. However, its successful implementation requires a thorough understanding of its impacts on assay performance. In this perspective, we review recent case studies comparing singlicate and duplicate formats, focusing on cut point factors and sample result agreement, and seek to discuss how singlicate influences assay cut points and explore considerations for low positive control criteria under singlicate conditions. Furthermore, we propose a strategy for implementing singlicate analysis in both new and existing ADA assays, hoping to contribute to ongoing discussions in this area.

摘要

单份抗药物抗体(ADA)分析作为一种优化免疫原性评估的有前景的方法正逐渐得到认可。它在成本效益方面具有显著优势,并且符合以患者为中心的原则。然而,其成功实施需要全面了解其对检测性能的影响。从这个角度出发,我们回顾了最近比较单份和双份检测形式的案例研究,重点关注切点因素和样本结果一致性,并试图讨论单份检测如何影响检测切点,以及探讨单份检测条件下低阳性对照标准的考量因素。此外,我们提出了在新的和现有的ADA检测中实施单份分析的策略,希望能为该领域正在进行的讨论做出贡献。

相似文献

1
Singlicate analysis in ADA assays: comparing assay performance in duplicate and singlicate formats.
Bioanalysis. 2025 Mar;17(5):371-377. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2464421. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
2
Impact of positive control binding properties on anti-drug antibody assay performance.
Bioanalysis. 2025 Jun;17(11):701-706. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2518045. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Method development for the detection of anti-drug antibodies against a therapeutic peptide: assay format selection.
Bioanalysis. 2025 Apr;17(8):537-548. doi: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2501937. Epub 2025 May 10.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

本文引用的文献

4
Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization.
AAPS J. 2021 Dec 1;24(1):4. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y.
6
Report on the AAPS Immunogenicity Guidance Forum.
AAPS J. 2019 Apr 16;21(4):55. doi: 10.1208/s12248-019-0328-8.
7
Excessive outlier removal may result in cut points that are not suitable for immunogenicity assessments.
J Immunol Methods. 2018 Dec;463:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
8
Singlicate analysis in regulated bioanalysis using ligand-binding assays: where are we heading?
Bioanalysis. 2017 Sep;9(18):1357-1359. doi: 10.4155/bio-2017-0151. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
Recommendations for Systematic Statistical Computation of Immunogenicity Cut Points.
AAPS J. 2017 Sep;19(5):1487-1498. doi: 10.1208/s12248-017-0107-3. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
10
Recommendations for the characterization of immunogenicity response to multiple domain biotherapeutics.
J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jun;408:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验