Suppr超能文献

微针疗法及其在脱发疾病中的应用:一项系统评价。

Microneedling and Its Use in Hair Loss Disorders: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

English Robert S, Ruiz Sophia, DoAmaral Pedro

机构信息

Perfect Hair Health, 2021 Fillmore, Ste 98, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Jan;12(1):41-60. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00653-2. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Microneedling (MN) is a minimally invasive procedure involving the induction of percutaneous wounds with medical-grade needles. In this literature review, we investigate clinical data on MN for the treatment of hair loss disorders.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through PubMed up to November 2021 to identify original articles evaluating the use of MN on hair loss disorders. The database was searched using the following keywords: "microneedling," "micro needling," "micro needle," "microneedle," "needle," "dermaroller" and "alopecia," "hair loss," "alopecia," "areata," "cicatricial," or "effluvium," RESULTS: A total of 22 clinical studies featuring 1127 subjects met our criteria for inclusion. Jadad scores ranged from 1 to 3, with a mean of 2. As an adjunct therapy, MN improved hair parameters across genders and a range of hair loss types, severities, needling devices, needling depths of 0.50-2.50 mm, and session frequencies from once weekly to monthly. Across 17 investigations totaling 911 androgenic alopecia (AGA) subjects, MN improved hair parameters when paired with 5% minoxidil, growth factor solutions, and/or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) topicals, or when introduced to subjects whose hair count changes had plateaued for ≥ 6 months on other treatments. Across four investigations on 201 alopecia areata (AA) subjects, MN improved hair parameters as a standalone therapy versus cryotherapy, as an adjunct to 5-aminolevulinic acid and photodynamic therapy, and equivalently when paired with topical PRP versus carbon dioxide laser therapy with topical PRP. Across 657 subjects receiving MN, no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical studies demonstrate generally favorable results for MN as an adjunct therapy for AGA and AA. However, data are of relatively low quality. Significant heterogeneity exists across interventions, comparators, and MN procedures. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are recommended to discern the effects of MN as a standalone and adjunct therapy, determine best practices, and establish long-term safety.

摘要

引言

微针疗法(MN)是一种微创手术,通过医用级针头诱导经皮伤口。在这篇文献综述中,我们研究了微针疗法治疗脱发疾病的临床数据。

方法

截至2021年11月,通过PubMed进行文献检索,以识别评估微针疗法治疗脱发疾病的原始文章。使用以下关键词搜索数据库:“微针疗法”、“微针”、“微针”、“微针”、“针”、“微针滚轮”以及“斑秃”、“脱发”、“脱发症”、“斑秃”、“瘢痕性”或“脱发”。结果:共有22项涉及1127名受试者的临床研究符合我们的纳入标准。雅达德评分范围为1至3,平均分为2。作为辅助疗法,微针疗法改善了不同性别以及一系列脱发类型、严重程度、针刺设备、针刺深度为0.50 - 2.50毫米、疗程频率从每周一次到每月一次的患者的头发参数。在总共涉及911名雄激素性脱发(AGA)受试者的17项研究中,微针疗法与5%米诺地尔、生长因子溶液和/或富含血小板血浆(PRP)外用剂联合使用时,或引入到其他治疗后头发数量变化已稳定≥6个月的受试者中时,改善了头发参数。在对201名斑秃(AA)受试者进行的四项研究中,微针疗法作为独立疗法与冷冻疗法相比、作为5 - 氨基酮戊酸和光动力疗法的辅助疗法,以及与外用PRP联合使用时与外用PRP的二氧化碳激光疗法等效时,均改善了头发参数。在接受微针疗法的657名受试者中,未报告严重不良事件。

结论

临床研究表明,微针疗法作为AGA和AA的辅助疗法总体效果良好。然而,数据质量相对较低。在干预措施、对照和微针程序方面存在显著异质性。建议进行大规模随机对照试验,以了解微针疗法作为独立疗法和辅助疗法的效果,确定最佳实践方法,并确立长期安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0f8/8776974/5e0f9882b9de/13555_2021_653_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验