Suppr超能文献

酰胺质子转移 MRI 可用于评估脑白质高信号的病理生理状态。

Amide Proton Transfer MRI Could Be Used to Evaluate the Pathophysiological Status of White Matter Hyperintensities.

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, China.

Department of Medical Imaging, Nanxishan Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin, China.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jul;56(1):301-309. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28013. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pathophysiology of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) remains unclear, investigations of amide proton transfer (APT) signals in WMH disease may provide relevant pathophysiological information.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the APT signals differences and heterogeneity of WMH and adjacent normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) at different Fazekas grades and different locations.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

In all, 180 WMH patients (age, 40-76; male/female, 77/103) and 59 healthy controls (age, 42-70; male/female, 23/36).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3 T; 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), 3D APT-weighted (APTw).

ASSESSMENT

The mean APTw values (APTw ) and the APTw signals heterogeneity (APTw ) among different grades WMH and NAWM and the APTw of the same grade deep WMH (DWMH) and paraventricular WMH (PWMH) were calculated and compared. Regions of interests were delineated on WMH lesions, NAWM and healthy white matter.

STATISTICAL TESTS

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA); independent sample t test; Chi-square test. Significance level: P < 0.05.

RESULTS

APTw among different grade WMH (from grade 0 to 3, 0.58 ± 0.14% vs. 0.29 ± 0.23% vs. 0.37 ± 0.24% vs. 0.61 ± 0.22%, respectively) were significantly different except between grade 1 and 2 (P = 0.27) and between grade 0 and 3 (P = 0.97). The differences in APTw between WMH and NAWM were significant (WMH vs. NAWM from grade 1 to 3, 0.29% ± 0.23% vs. 0.55% ± 0.27%; 0.37% ± 0.24% vs. 0.59% ± 0.22%; 0.61% ± 0.22% vs. 0.42% ± 0.24%, respectively). Lower APTw values were found only in grade 3 NAWM than other grades NAWM and controls. The APTw values of grade 1-3 WMH (0.38% ± 0.27% vs. 0.51% ± 0.31% vs. 0.67% ± 0.34%, respectively) were significantly different. Higher APT values were found only in grade 2 PWMH (0.47% ± 0.22% vs. 0.32% ± 0.24%).

DATA CONCLUSION

Significant differences of APT signals were found in WMH of different Fazekas grades and different locations.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

摘要

背景

脑白质高信号(WMH)的病理生理学仍不清楚,对WMH 疾病中的酰胺质子转移(APT)信号进行研究可能提供相关的病理生理学信息。

目的

评估不同 Fazekas 分级和不同部位的 WMH 及其相邻正常表现白质(NAWM)的 APT 信号差异和异质性。

研究类型

前瞻性。

人群

共 180 例 WMH 患者(年龄 40-76 岁;男/女 77/103)和 59 例健康对照者(年龄 42-70 岁;男/女 23/36)。

场强/序列:3T;3D 液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR),3D APT 加权(APTw)。

评估

计算并比较不同分级 WMH 和 NAWM 之间的平均 APTw 值(APTw)和 APTw 信号异质性(APTw),以及深部 WMH(DWMH)和旁脑室区 WMH(PWMH)相同分级的 APTw。在 WMH 病变、NAWM 和正常白质上勾画感兴趣区。

统计学方法

单因素方差分析(ANOVA);独立样本 t 检验;卡方检验。显著性水平:P<0.05。

结果

不同分级的 WMH 之间的 APTw(从分级 0 到 3,0.58±0.14%比 0.29±0.23%比 0.37±0.24%比 0.61±0.22%)存在显著差异,除分级 1 和 2(P=0.27)和分级 0 和 3(P=0.97)之间外。WMH 和 NAWM 之间的 APTw 差异显著(从分级 1 到 3,WMH 比 NAWM,0.29%±0.23%比 0.55%±0.27%;0.37%±0.24%比 0.59%±0.22%;0.61%±0.22%比 0.42%±0.24%)。仅在分级 3 的 NAWM 中发现 APTw 值较低,低于其他分级的 NAWM 和对照组。分级 1-3 的 WMH 的 APTw 值(0.38%±0.27%比 0.51%±0.31%比 0.67%±0.34%)存在显著差异。仅在分级 2 的 PWMH 中发现 APT 值较高(0.47%±0.22%比 0.32%±0.24%)。

数据结论

不同 Fazekas 分级和不同部位的 WMH 存在明显的 APT 信号差异。

证据水平

2 级技术效能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验