Division of Health Services Research, Policy & Administration, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, US.
OptumLabs® Visiting Fellow, Minneapolis, US.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):428-438. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01360-w. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
Background The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidelines and certain healthcare payers have made pharmacy coverage changes (PCC) focusing on regulating prescription opioids. Aim We evaluated differences in the rate of first-time opioid fills at doses ≥ 50 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day and first-time opioid fills with benzodiazepine fill overlap following the CDC guidelines and following a PCC between provider types, geographic locations, and insurance types. Method We used OptumLabs® Data Warehouse claims data between 2014 and 2018. Subjects were opioid naïve non-cancer care patients, 18 years and older who had an identified chronic pain condition ICD diagnosis within 2 weeks prior to their first-time opioid fill. We used multiple treatment period segmented regression analysis with interaction terms to test the differences between primary care providers (PCPs) and specialist providers (SPs), urban and rural primary care service areas (PCSAs), and Medicare Advantage (MA) and commercially insured patients (CIPs) in their first-time opioid fill patterns. Results Prescribing first-time opioid fills at doses ≥ 50MME/day declined following the CDC guidelines and PCC, the decline was greater among SPs than PCPs and in rural PCSAs than urban PCSAs. Also, following the CDC guidelines, the decline was greater among MA patients however following the PCC the decline was greater among CIPs. There were no differences in rate of first-time opioid fill with benzodiazepine overlap between groups. Conclusion Responses to the CDC opioid guidelines and a PCC differed between PCPs and SPs, urban and rural PCSAs, and when prescribing to MA and CIPs. Understanding these differences is important to help inform future guidelines.
疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)发布了指南,某些医疗保健支付方也进行了药房覆盖范围的改变(PCC),重点是规范处方类阿片的使用。目的:我们评估了在遵循 CDC 指南和 PCC 后,不同类型的医疗服务提供者、地理位置和保险类型之间首次开具 50 毫克吗啡等效剂量(MME)/天及以上的阿片类药物首次处方以及首次开具阿片类药物时与苯二氮䓬类药物同时开具的处方率差异。方法:我们使用了 OptumLabs®Data Warehouse 2014 年至 2018 年期间的索赔数据。研究对象为首次开具阿片类药物前 2 周内有明确慢性疼痛疾病 ICD 诊断的阿片类药物初治非癌症护理患者,年龄在 18 岁及以上。我们使用多治疗期分段回归分析,并设置交互项,以检验初级保健提供者(PCP)和专科提供者(SP)、城乡初级保健服务区域(PCSA)以及医疗保险优势计划(MA)和商业保险患者(CIP)在首次开具阿片类药物方面的差异。结果:遵循 CDC 指南和 PCC 后,开具 50MME/天及以上剂量的阿片类药物首次处方的比例下降,SP 开具此类处方的降幅大于 PCP,农村 PCSA 降幅大于城市 PCSA。此外,遵循 CDC 指南后,MA 患者的降幅更大,但遵循 PCC 后,CIP 患者的降幅更大。在各组之间,首次开具阿片类药物与苯二氮䓬类药物同时开具的处方率没有差异。结论:在 PCP 和 SP、城乡 PCSA 以及 MA 和 CIP 处方方面,对 CDC 阿片类药物指南和 PCC 的反应存在差异。了解这些差异对于指导未来的指南非常重要。