Service de Pharmacologie Médicale et Clinique, Centre de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmacoépidemiologie et d'Informations sur le Médicament, CIC INSERM 1436, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire-Faculté de Médecine, Toulouse, France.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr;36(2):443-447. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12741. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
Diarrhea is an adverse drug reaction (ADR) widely reported with olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). Isolated case reports described this ADR with other ARBs. The present study was performed to investigate if, among the different ARBs, some drugs are more at risk of diarrhea than others. Using VigiBase®, the WHO pharmacovigilance database, we performed a disproportionality analysis (case/noncase study). Cases were reports with the MedDRA PT term « diarrhea » and noncases all other reports registered during the same period in Vigibase® from April 6, 1995 to December 31, 2020. After comparison of ARBs and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), the main analysis was a comparison of the diarrhea reporting risk between each ARB and the seven other ARBs. Results are reported as reporting odds ratio (ROR) adjusted on age, gender, exposure to antihypertensive, and antidiabetic drugs with their 95% confidence interval. Among the 22,429,334 deduplicated reports registered in VigiBase® during the study period, 73,507 involved ARBs, including 2119 diarrhea. The reporting risk of diarrhea was higher with ARBs than with ACEIs (ROR = 2.06 (1.55-2.17)). Diarrhea with ARBs mainly occurred in females with a mean age of 65 years. After exclusion of olmesartan (to minimize a notoriety bias), two ARBs were significantly associated with diarrhea: eprosartan (ROR = 1.93 (1.32-2.72) and telmisartan (ROR = 1.41 (1.23-1.62) but not the six others. The present study found first that diarrhea is more frequently reported with ARBs than with ACEIs and second that the risk of diarrhea differs according to the different ARBs. Diarrhea with ARBs is not a class effect.
腹泻是血管紧张素 II 受体阻滞剂(ARB)类药物常见的不良反应(ADR)。已有个案报道称,其他 ARB 类药物也会引起这种不良反应。本研究旨在探究不同 ARB 类药物中,是否存在某些药物比其他药物更容易引起腹泻的情况。我们使用世界卫生组织药物警戒数据库 VigiBase®,进行了一项比例失衡分析(病例/非病例研究)。病例为 MedDRA PT 术语“腹泻”的报告,而非病例为同期 Vigibase®中注册的所有其他报告,时间范围为 1995 年 4 月 6 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。在比较 ARB 和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)后,主要分析是比较每种 ARB 与其他 7 种 ARB 的腹泻报告风险。结果以报告比值比(ROR)表示,并根据年龄、性别、接受抗高血压和抗糖尿病药物的情况进行了调整,置信区间为 95%。在研究期间,VigiBase®中重复报告被剔除后共登记了 22429334 份报告,其中涉及 ARB 的报告有 73507 份,包括 2119 份腹泻报告。与 ACEI 相比,ARBs 引起腹泻的报告风险更高(ROR=2.06(1.55-2.17))。ARBs 引起的腹泻主要发生在女性,平均年龄为 65 岁。排除奥美沙坦(以尽量减少恶名偏见)后,有两种 ARB 与腹泻显著相关:厄贝沙坦(ROR=1.93(1.32-2.72))和替米沙坦(ROR=1.41(1.23-1.62)),但其他六种 ARB 则不然。本研究首次发现,与 ACEI 相比,ARBs 引起腹泻的报告更为频繁,其次,不同 ARB 引起腹泻的风险也不同。ARBs 引起的腹泻不是一种类效应。