Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
ESMO Open. 2021 Dec;6(6):100320. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100320. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
The objective of this study was to evaluate trends in survival and health care costs in metastatic melanoma in the era of targeted and immunotherapeutic drugs.
Data on survival and health care resource use were retrieved from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival. Health care costs and budget impact were computed by applying unit costs to individual patient resource use. All outcomes were stratified by year of diagnosis.
Baseline characteristics were balanced across cohort years. The percentage of patients receiving systemic treatment increased from 73% in 2013 to 90% in 2018. Patients received on average 1.85 [standard deviation (SD): 1.14] lines of treatment and 41% of patients received at least two lines of treatment. Median survival increased from 11.8 months in 2013 [95% confidence interval (CI): 10.7-13.7 months] to 21.1 months in 2018 (95% CI: 18.2 months-not reached). Total mean costs were €100 330 (SD: €103 699); systemic treatments accounted for 84% of the total costs. Costs for patients who received systemic treatment [€118 905 (SD: €104 166)] remained reasonably stable over the years even after the introduction of additional (combination of) novel drugs. From mid-2013 to 2018, the total budget impact for all patients was €452.79 million.
Our study shows a gain in survival in the era of novel targeted and immunotherapeutic drugs. These novel drugs came, however, along with substantial health care costs. Further insights into the cost-effectiveness of the novel drugs are crucial for ensuring value for money in the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma.
本研究旨在评估靶向和免疫治疗药物时代转移性黑色素瘤的生存和医疗保健成本趋势。
从荷兰黑色素瘤治疗登记处检索了生存和医疗资源使用数据。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估计总生存率。通过将单位成本应用于个体患者的资源使用情况,计算医疗保健成本和预算影响。所有结果均按诊断年份分层。
基线特征在队列年份之间保持平衡。接受系统治疗的患者比例从 2013 年的 73%增加到 2018 年的 90%。患者平均接受 1.85 条[标准差 (SD):1.14]治疗线,41%的患者接受至少两条治疗线。中位生存时间从 2013 年的 11.8 个月[95%置信区间 (CI):10.7-13.7 个月]增加到 2018 年的 21.1 个月(95%CI:18.2 个月-未达到)。总平均费用为 100330 欧元(SD:103699 欧元);系统治疗占总费用的 84%。接受系统治疗的患者的费用[118905 欧元(SD:104166 欧元)]多年来保持相对稳定,即使在引入更多(组合)新型药物后也是如此。从 2013 年年中到 2018 年,所有患者的总预算影响为 4527.99 万欧元。
我们的研究表明,在新型靶向和免疫治疗药物时代,生存得到了提高。然而,这些新型药物伴随着大量的医疗保健成本。进一步了解新型药物的成本效益对于确保转移性黑色素瘤患者治疗的性价比至关重要。