Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Nov 1;159(11):1195-1204. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3179.
Melanoma treatment has evolved during the past decade with the adoption of adjuvant and palliative immunotherapy and targeted therapies, with an unclear impact on health care costs and outcomes in routine practice.
To examine changes in health care costs, overall survival (OS), and time toxicity associated with primary treatment of melanoma.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study assessed a longitudinal, propensity score (PS)-matched, retrospective cohort of residents of Ontario, Canada, aged 20 years or older with stages II to IV cutaneous melanoma identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry from January 1, 2018, to March 31, 2019. A historical comparison cohort was identified from a population-based sample of invasive melanoma cases diagnosed from the Ontario Cancer Registry from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2012. Data analysis was performed from October 17, 2022, to March 13, 2023.
Era of melanoma diagnosis (2007-2012 vs 2018-2019).
The primary outcomes were mean per-capita health care and systemic therapy costs (Canadian dollars) during the first year after melanoma diagnosis, time toxicity (days with physical health care contact) within 1 year of initial treatment, and OS. Standardized differences were used to compare costs and time toxicity. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare OS among PS-matched cohorts.
A PS-matched cohort of 731 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [14.8] years; 437 [59.8%] male) with melanoma from 2018 to 2019 and 731 patients (mean [SD] age, 67.9 [14.4] years; 440 [60.2%] male) from 2007 to 2012 were evaluated. The 2018 to 2019 patients had greater mean (SD) health care (including systemic therapy) costs compared with the 2007 to 2012 patients ($47 886 [$55 176] vs $33 347 [$31 576]), specifically for stage III ($67 108 [$57 226] vs $46 511 [$30 622]) and stage IV disease ($117 450 [$79 272] vs $47 739 [$37 652]). Mean (SD) systemic therapy costs were greater among 2018 to 2019 patients: stage II ($40 823 [$40 621] vs $10 309 [$12 176]), III ($55 699 [$41 181] vs $9764 [$12 771]), and IV disease ($79 358 [$50 442] vs $9318 [$14 986]). Overall survival was greater for the 2018 to 2019 cohort compared with the 2007 to 2012 cohort (3-year OS: 74.2% [95% CI, 70.8%-77.2%] vs 65.8% [95% CI, 62.2%-69.1%], hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.61-0.85]; P < .001). Time toxicity was similar between eras. Patients with stage IV disease spent more than 1 day per week (>52 days) with physical contact with the health care system by 2018 to 2019 (mean [SD], 58.7 [43.8] vs 44.2 [26.5] days; standardized difference, 0.40; P = .20).
This cohort study found greater health care costs in the treatment of stages II to IV melanoma and substantial time toxicity for patients with stage IV disease, with improvements in OS associated with the adoption of immunotherapy and targeted therapies. These health system-wide data highlight the trade-off with adoption of new therapies, for which there is a greater economic burden to the health care system and time burden to patients but an associated improvement in survival.
重要性:在过去十年中,随着辅助和姑息性免疫治疗和靶向治疗的采用,黑色素瘤的治疗方法不断发展,但其对常规实践中的医疗保健成本和结果的影响尚不清楚。
目的:研究与黑色素瘤的初始治疗相关的医疗保健成本、总生存期(OS)和时间毒性的变化。
设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究评估了来自加拿大安大略省的一个纵向、倾向评分(PS)匹配、回顾性队列,该队列由从 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日从安大略癌症登记处诊断的 20 岁或以上的 II 期至 IV 期皮肤黑色素瘤患者组成。从 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2012 年 12 月 31 日从安大略癌症登记处诊断的侵袭性黑色素瘤病例的基于人群的样本中确定了一个历史对照队列。数据分析于 2022 年 10 月 17 日至 2023 年 3 月 13 日进行。
暴露:黑色素瘤诊断的时代(2007-2012 年与 2018-2019 年)。
主要结果和措施:主要结果是在黑色素瘤诊断后的第一年期间的人均医疗保健和系统治疗成本(加元)、初始治疗后一年内的时间毒性(与身体健康护理接触的天数)和 OS。使用标准化差异来比较成本和时间毒性。Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 比例风险回归用于比较 PS 匹配队列的 OS。
结果:评估了 2018 年至 2019 年期间的 731 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,67.9[14.8]岁;437[59.8%]男性)和 2007 年至 2012 年期间的 731 名患者(平均[SD]年龄,67.9[14.4]岁;440[60.2%]男性)。与 2007 年至 2012 年相比,2018 年至 2019 年的患者具有更高的平均(SD)医疗保健(包括系统治疗)成本,具体来说,III 期($67108[57226] vs $46511[30622])和 IV 期疾病($117450[79272] vs $47739[37652])。2018 年至 2019 年患者的平均(SD)系统治疗成本更高:II 期($40823[40621] vs $10309[12771])、III 期($55699[41181] vs $9764[12771])和 IV 期疾病($79358[50442] vs $9318[14986])。与 2007 年至 2012 年相比,2018 年至 2019 年的队列 OS 更高(3 年 OS:74.2%[95%CI,70.8%-77.2%] vs 65.8%[95%CI,62.2%-69.1%],风险比,0.72[95%CI,0.61-0.85];P<.001)。时间毒性在两个时代之间相似。IV 期疾病患者每周与医疗保健系统有超过 1 天的身体接触(>52 天),2018 年至 2019 年期间平均(SD)为 58.7[43.8] vs 44.2[26.5]天;标准化差异为 0.40;P=0.20)。
结论和相关性:这项队列研究发现,II 期至 IV 期黑色素瘤的治疗费用更高,IV 期疾病患者的时间毒性较大,免疫治疗和靶向治疗的采用与 OS 改善相关。这些全系统范围的数据突显了采用新疗法的权衡,因为这对医疗保健系统的经济负担和患者的时间负担更大,但与生存的改善相关。