Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Asian J Anesthesiol. 2021 Dec 1;59(4):135-151. doi: 10.6859/aja.202112_59(4).0002. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
Anesthesia for patients with morbid obesity can be challenging because of increased risk of opioid-related adverse events, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and poor pain control. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with inhalation anesthesia in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Clinical Trials Registry database from inception to July 22, 2020. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain and PONV scores. Secondary outcomes included opioid requirements, intraoperative time, complications, and time to recovery. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework was used to rate the certainty of evidence. Among 722 studies identified in our search, 7 randomized studies involving a total of 682 patients met the inclusion criteria. Bariatric surgery with TIVA resulted in a lower incidence of nausea (relative risk [RR], 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31-0.94; P = 0.03; moderate certainty) and vomiting (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.74; P = 0.008; moderate certainty). There was no difference in postoperative pain at 30 minutes, 1 hour, or 24 hours, or in postoperative opioid requirements. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery with TIVA had significantly lower incidence of PONV but no difference in postoperative pain when TIVA was compared to inhalation anesthesia techniques. These benefits should be considered in order to improve the quality of care and enhance recovery for the bariatric population, who are at an increased baseline risk of perioperative complications. Future adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the efficacy of the anesthesia regimens in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
肥胖患者的麻醉可能具有挑战性,因为阿片类药物相关不良事件、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)以及疼痛控制不佳的风险增加。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较全身麻醉(TIVA)与吸入麻醉在接受减重手术患者中的安全性和疗效。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和临床试验登记数据库,检索时间从建库到 2020 年 7 月 22 日。主要结局是术后疼痛和 PONV 评分。次要结局包括阿片类药物需求、手术时间、并发症和恢复时间。推荐评估、制定和评估框架用于评估证据的确定性。在我们的搜索中,有 722 项研究被确定,其中 7 项随机研究共纳入 682 名患者符合纳入标准。与 TIVA 相关的减重手术导致恶心(相对风险 [RR],0.54;95%置信区间 [CI],0.31-0.94;P = 0.03;中等确定性)和呕吐(RR,0.31;95% CI,0.13-0.74;P = 0.008;中等确定性)的发生率较低。术后 30 分钟、1 小时或 24 小时的疼痛或术后阿片类药物需求无差异。与吸入麻醉技术相比,接受 TIVA 行减重手术的患者 PONV 发生率显著降低,但术后疼痛无差异。在考虑提高围手术期并发症基线风险的肥胖人群的护理质量和促进康复时,应考虑这些益处。需要未来进行充分的随机对照试验来比较减重手术患者麻醉方案的疗效。