From the Department of Interventional Neuroradiology (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Z.M., N.M.).
China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases (M.W., L.Y., Z.H., K.K., R.C., Y.Y., J.S., Y.W., Z.M., N.M.), Beijing, China.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Jan;43(1):110-116. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7365. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
Chronic carotid artery occlusion remains a poorly understood risk factor for subsequent stroke, and potential revascularization is dependent on understanding the anatomy and nature of the occlusion. Luminal imaging cannot assess the nature of an occlusion, so the internal structure of the occlusion must be inferred. The present study examines the signal characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid occlusion that may point to management differentiation.
We prospectively recruited patients who were diagnosed with chronic carotid artery occlusion defined as longer than 4 weeks and confirmed by DSA. All patients underwent high-resolution MR vessel wall imaging examinations after enrollment. Baseline characteristics, vessel wall imaging features, and DSA features were collected and evaluated. The vessel wall imaging features included segment involvement, signal intensity, contrast enhancement, and vessel wall thickness. The symptomatic and asymptomatic chronic carotid artery occlusions were compared.
A total of 44 patients with 48 lesions were included in this study from February 2020 to December 2020. Of the 48 lesions, 35 (72.9%) were symptomatic and 13 (27.1%) were asymptomatic. There was no difference in baseline and DSA features. On vessel wall imaging, C1 and C2 were the most commonly involved segments (91.7% and 68.8%, respectively). Compared with symptomatic lesions, asymptomatic lesions were more often isointense (69.2%) in the distal segment (= .03). Both groups had diffuse wall thickening (80% and 100%).
Signal characteristics between those with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery occlusions differ in a statistically significant fashion, indicating a different structure of the occlusion.
慢性颈动脉闭塞仍然是一个理解不足的卒中后风险因素,潜在的血运重建取决于对闭塞的解剖结构和性质的理解。管腔成像不能评估闭塞的性质,因此必须推断闭塞的内部结构。本研究检查了症状性和无症状性颈动脉闭塞的信号特征,这些特征可能指向不同的治疗方法。
我们前瞻性地招募了被诊断为慢性颈动脉闭塞的患者,定义为超过 4 周且经 DSA 证实。所有患者在入组后均进行了高分辨率 MR 血管壁成像检查。收集并评估了基线特征、血管壁成像特征和 DSA 特征。血管壁成像特征包括节段受累、信号强度、对比增强和血管壁厚度。比较了症状性和无症状性慢性颈动脉闭塞。
本研究纳入了 2020 年 2 月至 2020 年 12 月期间的 44 名患者,共 48 处病变。48 处病变中,35 处(72.9%)为症状性,13 处(27.1%)为无症状性。在基线和 DSA 特征方面没有差异。在血管壁成像上,C1 和 C2 是最常受累的节段(分别为 91.7%和 68.8%)。与症状性病变相比,无症状性病变的远段信号更均匀(69.2%,=0.03)。两组均有弥漫性壁增厚(80%和 100%)。
症状性和无症状性颈动脉闭塞之间的信号特征存在统计学显著差异,表明闭塞的结构不同。