Khalaveh Farjad, Fazel Nadia, Mischkulnig Mario, Vossen Matthias Gerhard, Reinprecht Andrea, Dorfer Christian, Roessler Karl, Herta Johannes
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Medicine I, Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Neurol. 2021 Nov 8;12:734156. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.734156. eCollection 2021.
Multiple risk factors have been described to be related to external ventricular drain (EVD) associated infections, with results varying between studies. Former studies were limited by a non-uniform definition of EVD associated infection, thus complicating a comparison between studies. In this regard, we assessed risk factors promoting EVD associated infections and propose a modified practice-oriented definition of EVD associated infections. We performed a retrospective, single-center study on patients who were treated with an EVD, at the neurosurgical intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary center between 2008 and 2019. Based on microbiological findings and laboratory results, patients were assigned into an infection and a non-infection group. Patient characteristics and potential risk factors were compared between the two groups ( < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) for significant clinical, serum laboratory and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters were calculated. In total, 396 patients treated with an EVD were included into the study with a mean age of 54.3 (range: 18-89) years. EVD associated infections were observed in 32 (8.1%) patients. EVD insertion at another hospital (OR 3.86), and an increased CSF sampling frequency of more than every third day (OR 12.91) were detected as major risk factors for an EVD associated infection. The indication for EVD insertion, surgeon's experience, the setting of EVD insertion (ICU vs. operating room) and the operating time did not show any significant differences between the two groups. Furthermore, ROC analysis showed that clinical, serum laboratory and CSF parameters did not provide specific prediction of EVD associated infections (specificity 44.4%). This explains the high overtreatment rate in our cohort with the majority of our patients who received intrathecal vancomycin (63.3%), having either negative microbiological results ( = 12) or were defined as contaminations ( = 7). Since clinical parameters and blood analyzes are not very predictive to detect EVD associated infections in neurosurgical patients, sequential but not too frequent microbiological and laboratory analysis of CSF are still necessary. Furthermore, we propose a uniform classification for EVD associated infections to allow comparability between studies and to sensitize the treating physician in determining the right treatment.
已有多项危险因素被描述为与外置脑室引流(EVD)相关感染有关,不同研究结果各异。既往研究受限于EVD相关感染的定义不统一,因此难以在不同研究间进行比较。在此方面,我们评估了促进EVD相关感染的危险因素,并提出了一种改良的、以实践为导向的EVD相关感染定义。我们对2008年至2019年期间在一家三级中心的神经外科重症监护病房(ICU)接受EVD治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性单中心研究。根据微生物学检查结果和实验室结果,将患者分为感染组和非感染组。比较两组患者的特征和潜在危险因素(P<0.05)。计算显著临床、血清实验室和脑脊液(CSF)参数的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。本研究共纳入396例接受EVD治疗的患者,平均年龄54.3岁(范围:18 - 89岁)。32例(8.1%)患者发生了EVD相关感染。在另一家医院置入EVD(比值比3.86)以及脑脊液采样频率增加至每三天以上一次(比值比12.91)被检测为EVD相关感染的主要危险因素。两组在EVD置入的指征、外科医生经验、EVD置入地点(ICU与手术室)以及手术时间方面均未显示出任何显著差异。此外,ROC分析表明,临床、血清实验室和脑脊液参数并不能对EVD相关感染提供特异性预测(特异性44.4%)。这解释了我们队列中较高的过度治疗率,我们大多数接受鞘内注射万古霉素的患者(63.3%),要么微生物学检查结果为阴性(n = 12),要么被定义为污染(n = 7)。由于临床参数和血液分析对检测神经外科患者的EVD相关感染预测性不强,因此对脑脊液进行连续但不过于频繁的微生物学和实验室分析仍然是必要的。此外,我们提出了一种EVD相关感染的统一分类方法,以便不同研究之间具有可比性,并使治疗医生在确定正确治疗方案时更加敏感。