Rahman Sundus, Khan Fatima S, Samin Kashif A, Afridi Nighat, Ahmed Moiz
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Combined Military Hospital (CMH), Peshawar, PAK.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pak Emirates Military Hospital (PEMH), Rawalpindi, PAK.
Cureus. 2021 Oct 29;13(10):e19122. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19122. eCollection 2021 Oct.
Introduction Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is characterized by high blood loss (>80 mL per cycle) at regular menstrual intervals. It can have an impact on a woman's bodily, mental, and/or material well-being. The etiology is varied and can be local, systemic, or iatrogenic. The occurrence of HMB is between 4% and 27%, depending on objective menstrual bleeding measurements and on high estimates based on subjective bleeding measures. This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of oral tranexamic acid versus combined oral contraceptive (COC) pills in the management of excessive menstrual bleeding. Methodology A comparative study was conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Combined Military Hospital Peshawar, Pakistan, from October 2020 to March 2021. Women aged above 18 years who presented with heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) were included in the study. The exclusion criteria included all women with contraindications to the use of tranexamic acid, such as lactating mothers, pregnancy, use of oral contraceptives or steroids, history of renal malfunction or stroke, family history of thromboembolic disease, and ovarian or endometrial carcinoma. Patients with diagnosed leiomyomas with a size between >1 and 10 cm were included in the study. Women were allocated randomly into group A who received oral tranexamic acid 3.9-4 g per day or group B who received oral COC pills containing a combination of ethinyl estradiol 30 μg and norgestrel 0.3 mg. The efficacy of treatment was considered successful if there was a mean reduction in menstrual blood loss that was significantly greater than the baseline values. Results There were 178 patients in total, with 89 patients in each group. It was found that both oral tranexamic acid and combined oral contraceptives were equally effective in reducing the mean blood loss among patients and there was no statistical difference observed between the two groups. Upon stratification, it was found that both treatment groups were highly effective in younger age groups. Similarly, there was no significant difference in efficacy with respect to diabetes mellitus or hypertension. However, in individuals with leiomyomas, efficacy was significantly higher in patients who were in group B (combined oral contraceptives) (p = 0.004), and 46.1% of women in group A and 60.6% of women in group B did not experience any discomfort. Conclusion The current study revealed that both oral tranexamic acid and COC pills were equally effective in reducing the mean blood loss among patients with HMB. It was further found that the efficacy of both therapies was significantly higher in younger age groups. The efficacy of therapy was significantly reduced with the increasing age of the patient. Moreover, it was found that patients with leiomyomas benefitted more significantly from COC pills. There were no severe adverse effects reported in the study. However, future researches can explore the long-term side effects of both therapies. In short, both therapies were comparable in terms of efficacy and safety. Heavy menstrual bleeding can negatively impact a woman, emotionally and physically. Therefore, it is encouraged that physicians use their expert judgment while prescribing either oral tranexamic acid or COC pills to patients with HMB.
引言 月经过多(HMB)的特征是在规律的月经周期中失血量过多(每个周期>80 mL)。它会对女性的身体、心理和/或物质福祉产生影响。其病因多种多样,可能是局部性、全身性或医源性的。根据客观的月经出血测量以及基于主观出血测量的高估值,HMB的发生率在4%至27%之间。本研究旨在评估口服氨甲环酸与复方口服避孕药(COC)在治疗月经过多方面的疗效。
方法 2020年10月至2021年3月,在巴基斯坦白沙瓦联合军事医院妇产科进行了一项对比研究。纳入研究的为年龄在18岁以上且出现月经过多(HMB)的女性。排除标准包括所有有氨甲环酸使用禁忌证的女性,如哺乳期母亲、妊娠、使用口服避孕药或类固醇、有肾功能不全或中风病史、有血栓栓塞性疾病家族史以及患有卵巢癌或子宫内膜癌。诊断为肌瘤大小在>1至10 cm之间的患者纳入研究。女性被随机分为A组,每天服用3.9 - 4 g口服氨甲环酸,或B组,服用含有30 μg炔雌醇和0.3 mg左炔诺孕酮的复方口服避孕药。如果月经失血量的平均减少量显著大于基线值,则认为治疗有效。
结果 总共有178名患者,每组89名。结果发现,口服氨甲环酸和复方口服避孕药在减少患者平均失血量方面同样有效,两组之间未观察到统计学差异。分层后发现,两个治疗组在年轻年龄组中均非常有效。同样,在糖尿病或高血压方面疗效也无显著差异。然而,对于患有肌瘤的个体,B组(复方口服避孕药)患者的疗效显著更高(p = 0.004),A组46.1%的女性和B组60.6%的女性未出现任何不适。
结论 本研究表明,口服氨甲环酸和COC在减少HMB患者的平均失血量方面同样有效。进一步发现,两种疗法在年轻年龄组中的疗效显著更高。随着患者年龄的增加,治疗效果显著降低。此外,发现患有肌瘤的患者从COC中获益更显著。研究中未报告严重不良反应。然而,未来的研究可以探索两种疗法的长期副作用。简而言之,两种疗法在疗效和安全性方面具有可比性。月经过多会对女性的情绪和身体产生负面影响。因此,鼓励医生在为HMB患者开口服氨甲环酸或COC时运用专业判断。