Suppr超能文献

炎症性关节炎患者获得先进治疗的机会不平等:这是邮政编码抽奖吗?

Inequality of access to advanced therapies for patients with inflammatory arthritis: a postcode lottery?

作者信息

Kaul Arvind, Mistry Jatin, Iagnocco Annamaria, Baraliakos Xenofon, Bosworth Ailsa, McNicol Iain

机构信息

Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St. George's University of London.

Department of Rheumatology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021 Nov 10;5(3):rkab081. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkab081. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Advanced therapies (AT), including biologics, biosimilars and Janus kinase inhibitors, have dramatically improved the quality of life of patients with RA, PsA and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Evidence-based criteria for prescribing these drugs in England and Wales is formulated by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) through health technology appraisals and guidelines, with the aim of providing equitable access to AT for patients with severe or resistant disease. Similar bodies exist in some, but not all European countries, with disparities in AT access between countries for RA. We examined whether this disparity was mirrored in England for RA, PsA and axSpA despite the National Health Service in England and Wales being legally obliged to provide funding for AT recommended by NICE's Health Technology Appraisal board, through the commissioning bodies, the clinical commissioning groups (CCGs).

METHODS

We requested AT pathways from CCGs in England. Where these were not available, individual hospital Trusts were contacted using freedom of information requests.

RESULTS

We found marked variability in the way that CCGs in England interpret NICE guidance. We found 41, 29 and 25 different pathways for RA, PsA and axSpA, respectively. Similar disparities existed with sequential prescribing where one AT did not work, with limits on the numbers of sequential AT in 54%, 59% and 59% of CCGs for RA, PsA and axSpA, respectively, and with these limits being different for the same condition between CCGs.

CONCLUSION

Although patients at identical stages of their disease course should have access to the same NICE-approved AT, we found this is not the case for large parts of England. Inequality of access was found between regions, mirroring the variability that occurs between countries throughout Europe. Harmonization of access needs to be addressed by policymakers to ensure fairness in the way that clinicians and patients can access AT.

摘要

目的

包括生物制剂、生物类似药和 Janus 激酶抑制剂在内的先进疗法(AT)显著改善了类风湿关节炎(RA)、银屑病关节炎(PsA)和中轴型脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者的生活质量。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)通过卫生技术评估和指南制定了在英格兰和威尔士开具这些药物的循证标准,目的是为患有严重或难治性疾病的患者提供公平的先进疗法获取途径。一些但并非所有欧洲国家都有类似机构,各国在类风湿关节炎先进疗法的获取方面存在差异。我们研究了尽管英格兰和威尔士的国民医疗服务体系在法律上有义务通过委托机构即临床委托小组(CCG)为 NICE 卫生技术评估委员会推荐的先进疗法提供资金,但在英格兰,类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和中轴型脊柱关节炎患者获取先进疗法的情况是否也存在这种差异。

方法

我们向英格兰的临床委托小组索取先进疗法的使用途径。若无法获取这些信息,则通过信息公开请求联系各个医院信托机构。

结果

我们发现英格兰的临床委托小组对 NICE 指南的解读方式存在显著差异。我们分别发现类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和中轴型脊柱关节炎有 41 种、29 种和 25 种不同的使用途径。在一种先进疗法无效时的序贯用药方面也存在类似差异,在类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和中轴型脊柱关节炎的临床委托小组中,分别有 54%、59%和 59%对序贯使用先进疗法的数量有限制,并且不同临床委托小组针对同一病症的这些限制也有所不同。

结论

尽管处于相同病程阶段的患者应能获取相同的经 NICE 批准的先进疗法,但我们发现英格兰大部分地区并非如此。不同地区之间存在获取途径的不平等,这反映了整个欧洲国家之间存在的差异。政策制定者需要解决获取途径的协调问题,以确保临床医生和患者获取先进疗法的方式公平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88e4/8634385/1540a086d499/rkab081f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验