• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整形外科医生政治捐款的纵向、地理和描述性分析。

A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 9501 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, USA.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Akron General, Akron, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):2053-2059. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02686-6. Epub 2021 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1007/s00266-021-02686-6
PMID:34859276
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8638794/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Political contributions from healthcare providers are essential to shaping healthcare policy and allow physicians to expand their influence on a national level. Political Action Committees in particular provide a useful avenue for unifying contributions for the interest of a specific community. This study examined the geographical distribution, temporal pattern, and overall nature of the political contributions made by plastic surgeons.

METHODS

The Federal Election Commission was analyzed for political contributions made by plastic surgeons from 2003 to 2021 using the search terms "plastic surgeon," "microsurgeon," and "craniofacial" as well as physician contributions to PlastyPAC. Contributions were categorized based on political parties (Democratic, Republican, and independent parties), and further analyzed based on state distribution and year of contribution. Spatial distribution data were then visualized using heatmaps for each state.

RESULTS

The total sum of contributions between 2003 and 2021 from plastic surgeons was $5,306,605, with $1,737,178.51 for the Republican party, $962,773.26 for the Democratic party, and $2,604,149.86 for independent parties. Political funding of PlastyPAC consisted of 47.3% of the overall political contributions. There was no significant trend through the years in the overall contribution amount. The states with the most political contributions were California, New York, Florida, and Texas.

CONCLUSIONS

The temporal stagnation of total political contributions and decline in recent PlastyPAC funding from plastic surgeons support an increased political awareness for new plastic surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

医疗保健提供者的政治捐款对于塑造医疗政策至关重要,并使医生能够在国家层面扩大其影响力。特别地,政治行动委员会为统一特定社区的捐款提供了有用的途径。本研究检查了整形外科医生的政治捐款的地理分布、时间模式和总体性质。

方法

使用“整形外科医生”、“显微外科医生”和“颅面”以及医师对 PlastyPAC 的捐款等搜索词,分析联邦选举委员会 2003 年至 2021 年期间整形外科医生的政治捐款。根据政党(民主党、共和党和独立党)对捐款进行分类,并根据州分布和捐款年份进一步分析。然后使用每个州的热图可视化空间分布数据。

结果

2003 年至 2021 年期间整形外科医生的捐款总额为 5306605 美元,其中共和党为 1737178.51 美元,民主党为 962773.26 美元,独立党为 2604149.86 美元。PlastyPAC 的政治资金构成了总政治捐款的 47.3%。总的捐款金额多年来没有明显的趋势。政治捐款最多的州是加利福尼亚州、纽约州、佛罗里达州和德克萨斯州。

结论

整形外科医生的总政治捐款的时间停滞和最近 PlastyPAC 资金的下降支持了新整形外科医生的政治意识的提高。

证据水平 V:本杂志要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南 www.springer.com/00266 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/c9fe7c230c0a/266_2021_2686_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/5f4afcf265d3/266_2021_2686_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/143ad1eecd4a/266_2021_2686_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/b4e34feac6c5/266_2021_2686_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/19bfab5260f1/266_2021_2686_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/198e1a3c7c6a/266_2021_2686_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/c9fe7c230c0a/266_2021_2686_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/5f4afcf265d3/266_2021_2686_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/143ad1eecd4a/266_2021_2686_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/b4e34feac6c5/266_2021_2686_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/19bfab5260f1/266_2021_2686_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/198e1a3c7c6a/266_2021_2686_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44e9/8638794/c9fe7c230c0a/266_2021_2686_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Longitudinal, Geographical, and Descriptive Analysis of Political Contributions of Plastic Surgeons.整形外科医生政治捐款的纵向、地理和描述性分析。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Aug;46(4):2053-2059. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02686-6. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
2
Political Campaign Contributions of Surgeons in the United States Throughout the 2020 Election Cycle.美国外科医生在整个 2020 年选举周期中的政治竞选捐款。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):515-522. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0798.
3
Trends and Distribution of Political Contributions from Ophthalmologists in the United States.美国眼科医生政治献金的趋势与分布
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 1:1-4. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2022.2084117.
4
Orthopedics and US Politics: Trends in Political Donations by Orthopedic Surgeons.骨科与美国政治:骨科医生政治捐款趋势。
Orthopedics. 2022 May-Jun;45(3):134-138. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20220217-04. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
5
An Analysis of Political Contributions by Urologists in the United States: 2003-2022.美国泌尿科医生政治捐款分析:2003-2022 年
Urol Pract. 2023 Jul;10(4):335-341. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000413. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
6
An Analysis of Political Contributions from Neurosurgeons in the United States.美国神经外科医生政治捐款分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e130-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.073. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
7
Plastic Surgeons and their Financial Relationships with the Industry in the era of COVID: Insights from the Physician Payments Sunshine Act.COVID 时代的整形外科医生及其与行业的财务关系:从医师薪酬阳光法案中获得的见解。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Dec;46(6):3111-3116. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02944-1. Epub 2022 May 20.
8
Contributions of the First Female Plastic Surgeon to Modern-Day Rhytidectomies.第一位女性整形医师对现代除皱术的贡献。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Feb;44(1):240-245. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01507-1. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
9
"A Sign of Things to Come: Training Research Output Long-Term Scholarship in Academic Plastic Surgery.".“未来的迹象:学术整形外科学培训研究成果的长期奖学金。”
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;45(6):3022-3028. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02290-8. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
10
Online and Social Media Footprint of All Swedish Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons.所有瑞典美容整形外科医生的在线和社交媒体足迹。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019 Oct;43(5):1400-1405. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01392-8. Epub 2019 May 7.

引用本文的文献

1
An Observational Study of Political Contributions by Self-Described Otolaryngologists in the United States.美国自称耳鼻喉科医生的政治捐款情况观察研究。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025 May 14;10(3):e70144. doi: 10.1002/lio2.70144. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Political Advocacy from Plastic Surgery Trainees in the United States.美国整形外科住院医师的政治宣传活动。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 May 21;9(5):e3590. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003590. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Patient Advocacy in Plastic Surgery: An Underutilized Tool.整形手术中的患者权益倡导:一种未得到充分利用的工具。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 May 3;7(5):e2207. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002207. eCollection 2019 May.
3
Physician activism in American politics: The opposition to the Price nomination.
美国政治中的医师行动主义:反对普莱斯提名。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 10;14(6):e0215802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215802. eCollection 2019.
4
An Analysis of Malpractice Litigation and Expert Witnesses in Plastic Surgery.整形手术中的医疗事故诉讼与专家证人分析
Eplasty. 2017 Sep 28;17:e30. eCollection 2017.
5
Sustainable Growth Rate Repealed, MACRA Revealed: Historical Context and Analysis of Recent Changes in Medicare Physician Payment Methodologies.可持续增长率被废除,《医疗保险和医疗救助法案》(MACRA)出台:历史背景及医疗保险医师支付方法近期变化分析
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 Feb;37(2):210-4. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4522. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
6
The political polarization of physicians in the United States: an analysis of campaign contributions to federal elections, 1991 through 2012.美国医生的政治极化:对 1991 年至 2012 年联邦选举竞选捐款的分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1308-17. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2105.
7
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in a nutshell.《患者保护与平价医疗法案》概述。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2012 Dec;9(12):877-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.09.009.