• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术姑息治疗的成功标准应该如何定义?

How Should Surgical Palliative Success Be Defined?

机构信息

Board certified in general surgery and in hospice and palliative medicine.

Practices at the Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2021 Oct 1;23(10):E778-782. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.778.

DOI:10.1001/amajethics.2021.778
PMID:34859771
Abstract

Palliative surgery is often defined as surgical intervention with intent to improve a patient's quality of life by relieving suffering secondary to symptoms of advanced disease. In the context of shared decision making about palliative surgery intervention, tensions can arise between patient (or surrogate) and surgeon, who might not share goals and values. This article suggests that a surgeon's clinical and ethical duty is to identify goals of care, including those related to quality of life, from a patient's perspective and to consider how to achieve them.

摘要

姑息手术通常被定义为一种手术干预,旨在通过缓解晚期疾病症状引起的痛苦来提高患者的生活质量。在姑息手术干预的共同决策背景下,患者(或代理人)和外科医生之间可能会出现紧张关系,他们可能没有共同的目标和价值观。本文认为,外科医生的临床和道德责任是从患者的角度确定治疗目标,包括与生活质量相关的目标,并考虑如何实现这些目标。

相似文献

1
How Should Surgical Palliative Success Be Defined?手术姑息治疗的成功标准应该如何定义?
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Oct 1;23(10):E778-782. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.778.
2
Palliative surgery and the surgeon's role in the palliative care team: a review.姑息手术与姑息治疗团队中外科医生的角色:综述。
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Feb;11(2):907-917. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-2381. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
3
An unexpected preoperative conversation, a new perspective on palliative care research.一次意外的术前谈话,对姑息治疗研究的新视角。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Aug;102(8):1570-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
Rethinking autonomy: decision making between patient and surgeon in advanced illnesses.重新思考自主权:晚期疾病中患者与外科医生之间的决策。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Feb;4(4):77. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2016.01.36.
5
Effective Palliative Care in the Trauma Setting.创伤环境中的有效姑息治疗。
Am Surg. 2020 Nov;86(11):1441-1444. doi: 10.1177/0003134820960047. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
6
Transitioning to Comfort-Focused Care at the End of Life.临终关怀的转变。
Surg Clin North Am. 2019 Oct;99(5):1019-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
7
Palliative Care and Shared Decision Making in the Neurocritical Care Unit.神经重症监护病房的姑息治疗和共同决策。
Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2021 Oct 1;27(5):1430-1443. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000001003.
8
Ethical Challenges When Establishing Goals of Care in the Acute Care Surgical Setting.在急性外科治疗环境中建立医疗照护目标时所面临的伦理挑战。
J Clin Ethics. 2022 Summer;33(2):146-150.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
10
Shared Decision-Making in the Context of Uncertain Care Goals and Outcomes: Dissecting a Penetrating Abdominal Trauma Case Complicated by Enterocutaneous Fistulae.不确定的治疗目标和结果背景下的共同决策:剖析一个伴有肠外瘘的穿透性腹部创伤病例。
Am Surg. 2020 Nov;86(11):1456-1461. doi: 10.1177/0003134820960051. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening Among BIPOC Populations in the Twin Cities.评估明尼阿波利斯双子城有色人种群体中乳腺癌筛查的障碍。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02245-0.