Department of Internal Medicine Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Clinic Burlington MA Evidence-Based Practice Center Mayo Clinic Rochester MN Division of Gastroenterology Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Clinic Burlington MA Department of MedicineDivision of Gastroenterology University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester MA Department of Internal Medicine Lincoln Medical Center Bronx NY Department of Internal MedicineWertachklinik Schwabmünchen Bavaria Germany Department of Internal Medicine University of Alexandria Alexandria Egypt Department of Internal Medicine Damascus University Damascus Syria Department of Library Services Mayo Clinic Rochester MN Department of Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Diseases Lahey Hospital and Medical CenterBeth Israel Lahey Health Burlington MA.
Liver Transpl. 2022 Jun;28(6):945-958. doi: 10.1002/lt.26383. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
There is no clear consensus regarding the optimal approach for secondary prophylaxis of gastric variceal bleeding (GVB) in patients with cirrhosis. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the efficacy of available treatments. A comprehensive search of several databases from each database's inception to March 23, 2021, was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes of interest were rebleeding and mortality. Results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to rate the certainty of evidence. We included 9 RCTs with 647 patients who had histories of GVB and follow-ups >6 weeks. A total of 9 interventions were included in the NMA. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) was associated with a lower risk of rebleeding when compared with β-blockers (RR, 0.04; 95% CI, 0.01-0.26; low certainty), and endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS)-cyanoacrylate (CYA) (RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77; low certainty). β-blockers were associated with a higher risk of rebleeding compared with most interventions and with increased mortality compared with EIS-CYA (RR, 4.12, 95% CI, 1.50-11.36; low certainty), and EIS-CYA + nonselective β-blockers (RR, 5.61; 95% CI, 1.91-16.43; low certainty). Analysis based on indirect comparisons suggests that BRTO may be the best intervention in preventing rebleeding, whereas β-blocker monotherapy is likely the worst in preventing rebleeding and mortality. Head-to-head RCTs are needed to validate these results.
对于肝硬化患者胃静脉曲张出血(GVB)的二级预防,目前尚没有明确的共识。我们进行了系统评价和网络荟萃分析(NMA),以比较现有治疗方法的疗效。从每个数据库的创建到 2021 年 3 月 23 日,全面检索了多个数据库,以确定相关的随机对照试验(RCT)。感兴趣的结果是再出血和死亡率。结果表示为相对风险(RR)和 95%置信区间(CI)。我们遵循推荐评估、制定和评估方法(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach)来评估证据的确定性。我们纳入了 9 项 RCT,共纳入了 647 例有 GVB 病史且随访时间>6 周的患者。共有 9 项干预措施纳入了 NMA。与β受体阻滞剂相比,球囊闭塞逆行经静脉闭塞术(BRTO)再出血风险较低(RR,0.04;95%CI,0.01-0.26;低确定性),与内镜下注射硬化剂(EIS)-氰基丙烯酸酯(CYA)相比(RR,0.18;95%CI,0.04-0.77;低确定性)。与大多数干预措施相比,β受体阻滞剂再出血风险较高,与 EIS-CYA 相比死亡率较高(RR,4.12,95%CI,1.50-11.36;低确定性),与 EIS-CYA+非选择性β受体阻滞剂相比(RR,5.61;95%CI,1.91-16.43;低确定性)。基于间接比较的分析表明,BRTO 可能是预防再出血的最佳干预措施,而β受体阻滞剂单药治疗可能是预防再出血和死亡率最差的干预措施。需要头对头 RCT 来验证这些结果。