• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychiatric Providers' Willingness to Participate in Shared Decision Making When Prescribing Psychotropics.精神科医疗服务提供者在开具精神药物时参与共同决策的意愿。
J Pharm Technol. 2015 Oct;31(5):212-218. doi: 10.1177/8755122515578288. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
2
Use and Perceptions of Shared Decision-Making by General Surgery Faculty and Trainees.普通外科教员和住院医师对共享决策的使用和看法。
J Surg Res. 2022 Aug;276:323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.03.009. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
3
To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.精神科患者在多大程度上参与他们的精神保健决策?与社会人口学、临床和心理学变量的关系。
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2014 Dec;26(6):372-81. doi: 10.1017/neu.2014.21. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
4
Perceptions of shared decision making among health care professionals.卫生保健专业人员对共同决策的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;25(6):1080-1087. doi: 10.1111/jep.13249. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
5
Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography.社区康复中共同决策的经验:聚焦民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05223-4.
6
Using incorpoRATE to examine clinician willingness to engage in shared decision making: A study of Family Medicine residents.使用 incorpoRATE 评估家庭医学住院医师参与共享决策的意愿:一项研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Dec;105(12):3529-3533. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
7
Recent advances in shared decision making for mental health.心理健康共同决策的最新进展。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;21(6):606-12. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830eb6b4.
8
Shared Decision-making With Parents of Hospitalized Children: A Qualitative Analysis of Parents' and Providers' Perspectives.与住院儿童的父母共同决策:对父母和提供者观点的定性分析。
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Nov;10(11):977-985. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2020-0075. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Perceptions of shared decision-making in severe mental illness: An integrative review.严重精神疾病中共享决策的认知:综合评价。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Apr;27(2):103-127. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12558. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
10
Providers' shared decision-making as a predictor of healthcare outcomes for college-aged adults managing upper respiratory tract infections.医疗服务提供者的共同决策作为管理上呼吸道感染的大学生成年人医疗保健结果的预测指标。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Mar;108:107619. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.107619. Epub 2022 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living with Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review.从理想主义者到现实主义者——为精神病患者抗精神病药物处方选择设计并实施共享决策干预措施(SHAPE):一项现实主义综述
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Jul 7;51(4):916-932. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf058.
2
Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.心理健康护理中共同决策挑战的视角转变
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):292-307. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01170-6. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
4
Systematic literature review of pharmacists in general practice in supporting the implementation of shared care agreements in primary care.系统文献综述:全科医生中的药剂师在支持初级保健中共同护理协议的实施方面的作用。
Syst Rev. 2022 May 11;11(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01933-4.
5
Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.成年重度精神疾病患者的共同决策:一项概念分析。
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Oct;17(4):e12365. doi: 10.1111/jjns.12365. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes toward concordance in psychiatry: a comparative, cross-sectional study of psychiatric patients and mental health professionals.对精神病学中一致性的态度:一项对精神科患者和精神卫生专业人员的比较性、横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2012 May 30;12:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-53.
2
Mental health professionals' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: a validation study of the Leeds Attitude to Concordance Scale II.精神健康专业人员对药物治疗合作的态度:对利兹一致性态度量表 II 的验证研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Feb;21(2):123-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.2240. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
3
Towards a clarification of terminology in medicine taking behavior: compliance, adherence and concordance are related although different terms with different uses.为明确用药行为的术语:依从性、坚持性和一致性虽相关,但却是用途不同的不同术语。
Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2011 May;6(2):74-7. doi: 10.2174/157488411796151110.
4
A questionnaire to measure health practitioners' attitudes to partnership in medicine taking: LATCon II.一份用于衡量医疗从业者对共同参与用药态度的问卷:LATCon II。
Health Expect. 2009 Jun;12(2):175-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00545.x.
5
Recent advances in shared decision making for mental health.心理健康共同决策的最新进展。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;21(6):606-12. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32830eb6b4.
6
Measuring shared decision making processes in psychiatry: skills versus patient satisfaction.衡量精神病学中的共同决策过程:技能与患者满意度
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Jul;67(1-2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.01.017. Epub 2007 Mar 12.
7
Applying theory-driven approaches to understanding and modifying clinicians' behavior: what do we know?应用理论驱动的方法来理解和改变临床医生的行为:我们了解什么?
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Mar;58(3):342-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.3.342.
8
Shared decision making and medication management in the recovery process.康复过程中的共同决策与药物管理
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 Nov;57(11):1636-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.2006.57.11.1636.
9
Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions.临床实践中实施共同决策的障碍与促进因素:对卫生专业人员认知的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2006 Aug 9;1:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-16.
10
The assessment of depressive patients' involvement in decision making in audio-taped primary care consultations.对抑郁症患者在录音的初级保健会诊中参与决策情况的评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):314-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.04.006. Epub 2006 Jul 26.

精神科医疗服务提供者在开具精神药物时参与共同决策的意愿。

Psychiatric Providers' Willingness to Participate in Shared Decision Making When Prescribing Psychotropics.

作者信息

Ali Saadia, Smith Tawny L, Mican Lisa, Brown Carolyn

机构信息

Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.

The University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Technol. 2015 Oct;31(5):212-218. doi: 10.1177/8755122515578288. Epub 2015 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1177/8755122515578288
PMID:34860895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5990192/
Abstract

Patients with mental health disorders experience difficulty in selecting treatments. With a paternalistic approach, patients are not offered an opportunity to provide input. Shared decision making (SDM) occurs when providers and patients collaborate on informed treatment decisions. Research on psychiatric providers' perceptions toward SDM is limited. This pilot study aimed to determine psychiatric providers' willingness to engage in SDM and factors that influence willingness. This cross-sectional, self-report study measured willingness, attitude, experiences, and barriers related to SDM as well as demographic/practice characteristics. A survey was e-mailed to psychiatric providers at 3 psychiatric institutions. Out of 80 providers e-mailed, 29 (36.3%) responded. Providers had a favorable attitude toward SDM (3.26 ± 0.24, range = 1-4) and a high willingness to use SDM (3.43 ± 0.50, range = 1-4). The most common SDM methods were discussions (96.6%) and written material (89.7%). Common perceived barriers included limited patient capacity (86.2%) and limited time with patient (62.1%). Current SDM users (3.46 ± 0.51) had a higher willingness to engage in SDM than noncurrent users (3.00 ± 0.00), = 4.63, df = 25.0, < .001. Attitude and willingness were positively related ( = .62, < .001). Attitude did not vary based on demographic/practice characteristics. Willingness to use SDM was positively related to a favorable attitude toward SDM. Larger, geographically diverse, randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to evaluate the willingness of psychiatric providers to conduct SDM.

摘要

患有精神健康障碍的患者在选择治疗方法时会遇到困难。采用家长式方法时,患者没有机会提供意见。当医疗服务提供者和患者就明智的治疗决策进行协作时,就会出现共同决策(SDM)。关于精神科医疗服务提供者对共同决策的看法的研究有限。这项试点研究旨在确定精神科医疗服务提供者参与共同决策的意愿以及影响意愿的因素。这项横断面自我报告研究测量了与共同决策相关的意愿、态度、经历和障碍以及人口统计学/实践特征。通过电子邮件向3家精神科机构的精神科医疗服务提供者发送了一份调查问卷。在通过电子邮件发送问卷的80名医疗服务提供者中,有29名(36.3%)回复。医疗服务提供者对共同决策持积极态度(3.26±0.24,范围为1 - 4),并且使用共同决策的意愿很高(3.43±0.50,范围为1 - 4)。最常见的共同决策方法是讨论(96.6%)和书面材料(89.7%)。常见的感知障碍包括患者能力有限(86.2%)和与患者相处时间有限(62.1%)。当前使用共同决策的用户(3.46±0.51)比非当前用户(3.00±0.00)参与共同决策的意愿更高,t = 4.63,自由度 = 25.0,p <.001。态度和意愿呈正相关(r =.62,p <.001)。态度不会因人口统计学/实践特征而有所不同。使用共同决策的意愿与对共同决策的积极态度呈正相关。需要进行更大规模、地域多样的随机对照试验,以评估精神科医疗服务提供者进行共同决策的意愿。