c/o Strategic Clinical Networks™, Alberta Health Services, Southport Tower, 10301 Southport Lane SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2W 1S7, Canada.
Integrative Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05223-4.
Shared decision-making (SDM) can advance patient satisfaction, understanding, goal fulfilment, and patient-reported outcomes. We lack clarity on whether this physician-focused literature applies to community rehabilitation, and on the integration of SDM policies in healthcare settings. We aimed to understand patient and provider perceptions of shared decision-making (SDM) in community rehabilitation, particularly the barriers and facilitators to SDM.
We used a focused ethnography involving 14 community rehabilitation sites across Alberta, including rural, regional-urban and metropolitan-urban sites. We conducted semi-structured interviews that asked participants about their positive and negative communication experiences (n = 23 patients; n = 26 providers).
We found SDM experiences fluctuated between extremes: Getting Patient Buy-In and Aligning Expectations. The former is provider-driven, prescriptive and less flexible; the latter is collaborative, inquisitive and empowering. In Aligning Expectations, patients and providers express humility and openness, communicate in the language of ask and listen, and view education as empowering. Patients and providers described barriers and facilitators to SDM in community rehabilitation. Facilitators included geography influencing context and connections; consistent, patient-specific messaging; patient lifestyle, capacity and perceived outlook; provider confidence, experience and perceived independence; provider training; and perceptions of more time (and control over time) for appointments. SDM barriers included lack of privacy; waitlists and financial barriers to access; provider approach; how choices are framed; and, patient's perceived assertiveness, lack of capacity, and level of deference.
We have found both excellent experiences and areas for improvement for applying SDM in community rehabilitation. We proffer recommendations to advance high-quality SDM in community rehabilitation based on promoting facilitators and overcoming barriers. This research will support the spread, scale and evaluation of a new Model of Care in rehabilitation by the provincial health system, which aimed to promote patient-centred care.
共同决策(SDM)可以提高患者满意度、理解度、目标实现度和患者报告的结果。我们不清楚这种以医生为中心的文献是否适用于社区康复,以及 SDM 政策在医疗保健环境中的整合情况。我们旨在了解社区康复中患者和提供者对共同决策(SDM)的看法,特别是 SDM 的障碍和促进因素。
我们使用了一项重点民族志研究,涉及艾伯塔省的 14 个社区康复地点,包括农村、区域城市和大都市区城市地点。我们进行了半结构化访谈,询问参与者他们的积极和消极沟通经验(n=23 名患者;n=26 名提供者)。
我们发现 SDM 经验在极端之间波动:获得患者认可和调整期望。前者是由提供者驱动的,是规范性的,灵活性较低;后者是协作性的、探究性的和赋权性的。在调整期望时,患者和提供者表现出谦逊和开放,以问和听的语言进行交流,并将教育视为赋权。患者和提供者描述了社区康复中 SDM 的障碍和促进因素。促进因素包括地理影响背景和联系;一致的、针对患者的信息传递;患者的生活方式、能力和感知前景;提供者的信心、经验和感知独立性;提供者培训;以及对预约时间(和对时间的控制)的看法。SDM 障碍包括缺乏隐私;获得机会的等待名单和经济障碍;提供者的方法;如何构建选择;以及患者的感知自信、缺乏能力和尊重程度。
我们发现,在社区康复中应用 SDM 既有出色的经验,也有需要改进的地方。我们根据促进促进因素和克服障碍提出了在社区康复中推进高质量 SDM 的建议。这项研究将支持省级卫生系统推广、扩展和评估新的康复护理模式,该模式旨在促进以患者为中心的护理。