Suppr超能文献

急性护理环境中甘精胰岛素与地特胰岛素单位等效性的评估。

Evaluation of Unit Equivalency of Insulin Glargine to Insulin Detemir in an Acute Care Setting.

作者信息

Cook Elizabeth A, Gill Taylor, Taylor Scott

机构信息

University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA.

Via Christi Hospitals, Wichita Inc, Wichita, KS, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Technol. 2018 Dec;34(6):239-243. doi: 10.1177/8755122518791265. Epub 2018 Jul 27.

Abstract

Insulin glargine and insulin detemir are the most commonly prescribed basal insulins in the United States. While these analogs chemically differ, clinical trials have established no significant difference in efficacy. However, controversy remains as to whether the 2 agents are comparable with regard to unit equivalency. To determine the ratio of glucose lowering between insulin detemir and insulin glargine. This institutional review board-approved, single-center, retrospective, case-crossover study was conducted in patients with diabetes mellitus with inpatient admissions between June 30, 2014, to July 1, 2015. Patients must have received both insulin detemir and insulin glargine on either the same or separate hospital visits. A blood glucose-lowering ratio for both insulin glargine and insulin detemir was calculated for each patient based off of up to 5 days of fasting blood glucose values and the total number of units of insulin administered. Fifty-two patients were included in this study. No significant difference was found in the blood glucose-lowering ratio between insulin glargine (0.23 mg/dL/unit) as compared with insulin detemir (0.16 mg/dL/unit; = .08). No difference was found in the blood glucose-lowering ratio between insulin glargine and insulin detemir. The results of this study suggest that conversion between insulin glargine and insulin detemir using a 1:1 ratio in an acute care setting may be appropriate.

摘要

甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素是美国最常处方的基础胰岛素。虽然这些类似物在化学结构上有所不同,但临床试验表明它们在疗效上没有显著差异。然而,关于这两种药物在单位等效性方面是否具有可比性仍存在争议。为了确定地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素之间降低血糖的比例。这项经机构审查委员会批准的单中心回顾性病例交叉研究在2014年6月30日至2015年7月1日期间住院的糖尿病患者中进行。患者必须在同一次或不同的医院就诊中接受过地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素治疗。根据每位患者最多5天的空腹血糖值和胰岛素给药的总单位数,计算出甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素的降血糖比例。本研究纳入了52例患者。与地特胰岛素(0.16mg/dL/单位;P = 0.08)相比,甘精胰岛素(0.23mg/dL/单位)的降血糖比例没有显著差异。甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素之间的降血糖比例没有差异。本研究结果表明,在急性护理环境中使用1:1的比例在甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素之间进行转换可能是合适的。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Unit Equivalency of Insulin Glargine to Insulin Detemir in an Acute Care Setting.
J Pharm Technol. 2018 Dec;34(6):239-243. doi: 10.1177/8755122518791265. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
2
8
Clinical and financial outcomes of switching insulin glargine to insulin detemir in a veteran population with type 2 diabetes.
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015 Jun 26;14:53. doi: 10.1186/s40200-015-0180-z. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
14. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: .
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S144-S151. doi: 10.2337/dc18-S014.
2
4
Comparing dosing of basal insulin analogues detemir and glargine: is it really unit-per-unit and dose-per-dose?
Ann Pharmacother. 2014 Mar;48(3):361-8. doi: 10.1177/1060028013518420. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
8
Insulin detemir versus insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD006383. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006383.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验