• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甘精胰岛素与地特胰岛素治疗住院患者高血糖及糖尿病的疗效与安全性比较

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GLARGINE AND DETEMIR INSULIN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INPATIENT HYPERGLYCEMIA AND DIABETES.

作者信息

Galindo Rodolfo J, Davis Georgia M, Fayfman Maya, Reyes-Umpierrez David, Alfa David, Peng Limin, Tamler Ronald, Pasquel Francisco J, Umpierrez Guillermo E

出版信息

Endocr Pract. 2017 Sep;23(9):1059-1066. doi: 10.4158/EP171804.OR. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

DOI:10.4158/EP171804.OR
PMID:28683239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6052791/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Glargine and detemir insulin are the two most commonly prescribed basal insulin analogues for the ambulatory and inpatient management of diabetes. The efficacy and safety of basal insulin analogues in the hospital setting has not been established.

METHODS

This observational study compared differences in glycemic control and outcomes in non-intensive care unit patients with blood glucose (BG) >140 mg/dL who were treated with glargine or detemir, between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015, in two academic centers.

RESULTS

Among 6,245 medical and surgical patients with hyperglycemia, 5,749 received one or more doses of glargine, and 496 patients received detemir during the hospital stay. There were no differences in the mean daily BG (glargine, 182 ± 46 mg/dL vs. detemir, 180 ± 44 mg/dL; P = .70). There were no differences in mortality, hospital complications, or re-admissions between groups (all, P>.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no statistically significant difference in hypoglycemia rates between treatment groups. Patients treated with detemir required higher total daily basal insulin doses (0.27 ± 0.16 units/kg/day vs. 0.22 ± 0.15 units/kg/day; P<.001). Glargine-treated patients had statistically longer length of stay; however, this difference may not be clinically relevant (6.8 ± 7.4 days vs. 6.0 ± 6.3 days; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that treatment with glargine and detemir results in similar inpatient glycemic control in general medicine and surgery patients. Detemir treatment was associated with higher daily basal insulin dose and number of injections. A prospective randomized study is needed to confirm these findings.

ABBREVIATIONS

BG = blood glucose BMI = body mass index CI = confidence interval eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision ICU = intensive care unit IQR = interquartile range LOS = length-of-stay OR = odd ratio.

摘要

目的

甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素是门诊及住院糖尿病患者最常用的两种基础胰岛素类似物。基础胰岛素类似物在医院环境中的疗效和安全性尚未确立。

方法

这项观察性研究比较了2012年1月1日至2015年9月30日期间,在两个学术中心,接受甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素治疗的非重症监护病房血糖(BG)>140mg/dL患者的血糖控制差异和结局。

结果

在6245例高血糖内科和外科患者中,5749例在住院期间接受了一剂或多剂甘精胰岛素,496例患者接受了地特胰岛素。平均每日血糖无差异(甘精胰岛素,182±46mg/dL vs地特胰岛素,180±44mg/dL;P = 0.70)。两组之间的死亡率、医院并发症或再入院率无差异(均P>0.05)。在调整潜在混杂因素后,治疗组之间的低血糖发生率无统计学显著差异。接受地特胰岛素治疗的患者每日基础胰岛素总剂量更高(0.27±0.16单位/千克/天vs 0.22±0.15单位/千克/天;P<0.001)。甘精胰岛素治疗的患者住院时间在统计学上更长;然而,这种差异可能不具有临床相关性(6.8±7.4天vs 6.0±6.3天;P<0.001)。

结论

我们的研究表明,甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素治疗在内科和外科患者中导致相似的住院血糖控制。地特胰岛素治疗与更高的每日基础胰岛素剂量和注射次数相关。需要进行前瞻性随机研究来证实这些发现。

缩写

BG =血糖;BMI =体重指数;CI =置信区间;eGFR =估计肾小球滤过率;HbA1c =糖化血红蛋白;ICD-9 =国际疾病分类第九版;ICU =重症监护病房;IQR =四分位数间距;LOS =住院时间;OR =比值比

相似文献

1
COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GLARGINE AND DETEMIR INSULIN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF INPATIENT HYPERGLYCEMIA AND DIABETES.甘精胰岛素与地特胰岛素治疗住院患者高血糖及糖尿病的疗效与安全性比较
Endocr Pract. 2017 Sep;23(9):1059-1066. doi: 10.4158/EP171804.OR. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
2
Detemir vs Glargine: Comparison of Inpatient Glycemic Control.地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素:住院患者血糖控制情况比较
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2019 Feb 1;119(2):89-95. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2019.014.
3
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Trial.地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素在2型糖尿病住院患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机交叉试验
Adv Ther. 2016 Feb;33(2):178-85. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0288-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
4
A 52-week, multinational, open-label, parallel-group, noninferiority, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen with mealtime insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes.一项为期52周的多国、开放标签、平行组、非劣效性、达标治疗试验,在2型糖尿病患者中,比较德谷胰岛素与甘精胰岛素在基础-餐时胰岛素方案中联合门冬胰岛素的疗效。
Clin Ther. 2008 Nov;30(11):1976-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.11.001.
5
Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in a basal-bolus regimen, with insulin aspart as the mealtime insulin, in patients with type 1 diabetes: a 52-week, multinational, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target noninferiority trial.在基础-餐时胰岛素方案中,将门冬胰岛素作为餐时胰岛素,比较地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素治疗 1 型糖尿病患者的 52 周、多国、随机、开放标签、平行组、治疗达标非劣效性试验。
Clin Ther. 2009 Oct;31(10):2086-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.10.006.
6
(Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.(超)长效胰岛素类似物用于 1 型糖尿病患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3(3):CD013498. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013498.pub2.
7
Higher insulin detemir doses are required for the similar glycemic control: comparison of insulin detemir and glargine in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus.对于相似的血糖控制需要更高剂量的地特胰岛素:1型糖尿病儿童中地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素的比较
Pediatr Diabetes. 2015 Aug;16(5):361-6. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12167. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
8
Glycemic Control in Adult Type 1 Diabetes Patients with Insulin Glargine, Insulin Detemir, or Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion in Daily Practice.在日常实践中,使用甘精胰岛素、地特胰岛素或持续皮下胰岛素输注治疗成人 1 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 May;20(5):363-369. doi: 10.1089/dia.2018.0027. Epub 2018 May 9.
9
A 1-year, prospective, observational study of Japanese outpatients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes switching from insulin glargine or detemir to insulin degludec in basal-bolus insulin therapy (Kumamoto Insulin Degludec Observational study).一项针对日本1型和2型糖尿病门诊患者的为期1年的前瞻性观察性研究,这些患者在基础-餐时胰岛素治疗中从甘精胰岛素或地特胰岛素转换为德谷胰岛素(熊本德谷胰岛素观察性研究)。
J Diabetes Investig. 2016 Sep;7(5):703-10. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12496. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
10
A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing a DPP4 Inhibitor (Linagliptin) and Basal Insulin (Glargine) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Long-term Care and Skilled Nursing Facilities: Linagliptin-LTC Trial.一项比较二肽基肽酶 4 抑制剂(利拉利汀)和基础胰岛素(甘精胰岛素)在长期护理和熟练护理设施中 2 型糖尿病患者的随机对照研究:利拉利汀-LTC 试验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 May;19(5):399-404.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in the management of hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus during hospitalization.住院期间高血糖症和糖尿病管理的进展
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1038/s41574-025-01157-1.
2
Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Guided Insulin Administration in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Randomized Clinical Trial.长期护理机构中基于连续血糖监测的胰岛素给药:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 May;25(5):884-888. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.01.031. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
3
Efficacy and safety of basal-bolus insulin at 1:1.5 ratio compared to 1:1 ratio using a weight-based initiation and titration (WIT2) algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 Diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study.在2型糖尿病住院患者中,使用基于体重的起始和滴定(WIT2)算法,比较1:1.5比例与1:1比例的基础-餐时胰岛素的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、临床研究。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2023 Nov 27;15(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01193-9.
4
American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update.美国临床内分泌学会临床实践指南:制定糖尿病综合护理计划-2022 更新版。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Oct;28(10):923-1049. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Evaluation of Unit Equivalency of Insulin Glargine to Insulin Detemir in an Acute Care Setting.急性护理环境中甘精胰岛素与地特胰岛素单位等效性的评估。
J Pharm Technol. 2018 Dec;34(6):239-243. doi: 10.1177/8755122518791265. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
6
Biochemical Parameters of Diabetes Ketoacidosis in Patients with End-stage Kidney Disease and Preserved Renal Function.终末期肾病且肾功能保留患者糖尿病酮症酸中毒的生化参数。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jun 16;106(7):e2673-e2679. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab126.
7
Comparison of weight-based insulin titration (WIT) and glucose-based insulin titration using basal-bolus algorithm in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, clinical study.比较基于体重的胰岛素滴定 (WIT) 和基于血糖的胰岛素滴定在 2 型糖尿病住院患者中使用基础-餐时胰岛素输注方案:一项多中心、随机、临床研究。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Sep;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001261.
8
Comparison of the FreeStyle Libre Pro Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) System and Point-of-Care Capillary Glucose Testing in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Basal-Bolus Insulin Regimen.对比利时福瑞诗 Libre Pro 瞬感葡萄糖监测系统和即时毛细血管血糖检测在接受基础-餐时胰岛素方案治疗的 2 型糖尿病住院患者中的应用。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2730-2735. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2073. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
9
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease hospitalized with diabetes ketoacidosis.伴有糖尿病酮症酸中毒的终末期肾病住院患者的临床特征和结局。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000763.
10
Construction and preliminary evaluation of the inpatient glycemic control questionnaire (IGCQ): a survey tool assessing perceptions and knowledge of resident physicians.住院患者血糖控制问卷(IGCQ)的构建和初步评估:一种评估住院医师认知和知识的调查工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1657-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Detemir and Insulin Glargine in Hospitalized Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Trial.地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素在2型糖尿病住院患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机交叉试验
Adv Ther. 2016 Feb;33(2):178-85. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0288-7. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
2
Comparison of Basal-Bolus and Premixed Insulin Regimens in Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病住院患者基础-餐时胰岛素方案与预混胰岛素方案的比较
Diabetes Care. 2015 Dec;38(12):2211-6. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0160. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
3
Evaluation of Glycemia Control Achieved by Glargine and Lispro Versus Detemir and Aspart Insulin Regimes in Type 2 Diabetics Undergoing Surgery.在接受手术的2型糖尿病患者中,比较甘精胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素与地特胰岛素和门冬胰岛素治疗方案实现血糖控制的效果评估。
Open Cardiovasc Med J. 2015 Jun 26;9:58-61. doi: 10.2174/1874192401509010058. eCollection 2015.
4
BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN WITH INSULIN ANALOGUES VERSUS HUMAN INSULIN IN MEDICAL PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL IN LATIN AMERICA.基础-餐时胰岛素类似物方案与普通胰岛素治疗拉丁美洲2型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验
Endocr Pract. 2015 Jul;21(7):807-13. doi: 10.4158/EP15675.OR. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
(13) Diabetes care in the hospital, nursing home, and skilled nursing facility.(13)医院、疗养院及专业护理机构中的糖尿病护理。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38 Suppl:S80-5. doi: 10.2337/dc15-S016.
6
A comparison of the pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin detemir and insulin glargine: a single dose clamp study in people with type 2 diabetes.比较地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素的药效学特征:在 2 型糖尿病患者中的单次剂量钳夹研究。
Diabetes Metab. 2013 Dec;39(6):537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
7
Risk factors for inpatient hypoglycemia during subcutaneous insulin therapy in non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病非危重症患者皮下胰岛素治疗期间住院低血糖的危险因素
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 Sep 1;6(5):1022-9. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600505.
8
A randomized trial of two weight-based doses of insulin glargine and glulisine in hospitalized subjects with type 2 diabetes and renal insufficiency.两种基于体重的甘精胰岛素和赖脯胰岛素剂量在 2 型糖尿病伴肾功能不全住院患者中的随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2012 Oct;35(10):1970-4. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0578. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
9
Management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline.非重症监护环境住院患者高血糖管理:内分泌学会临床实践指南。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):16-38. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2098.
10
Glycemic control in non-critically ill hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非危重症住院患者的血糖控制:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):49-58. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2100. Epub 2011 Nov 16.