Suppr超能文献

二甲双胍基础上加用每日 1 次基础胰岛素治疗:一项 26 周、随机、以目标为导向的临床试验,比较了每日 1 次基础胰岛素地特胰岛素与甘精胰岛素治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效。

Once-daily initiation of basal insulin as add-on to metformin: a 26-week, randomized, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Aug;15(8):729-36. doi: 10.1111/dom.12083. Epub 2013 Mar 13.

Abstract

AIMS

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin initiation using insulin detemir (detemir) or insulin glargine (glargine) added to existing metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

This 26-week, multinational, randomized, treat-to-target trial involved 457 insulin-naïve adults with T2D (HbA1c 7-9%). Detemir or glargine was added to current metformin therapy [any second oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) discontinued] and titrated to a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤90 mg/dl (≤5.0 mmol/l). Primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c.

RESULTS

Mean (s.d.) HbA1c decreased with detemir and glargine by 0.48 and 0.74%-points, respectively, to 7.48% (0.91%) and 7.13% (0.72%) [estimated between-treatment difference, 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14-0.46)]. Non-inferiority for detemir at the a priori level of 0.4%-points was not established. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% at 26 weeks were 38% and 53% (p = 0.026) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG decreased ∼43.2 mg/dl (∼2.4 mmol/l) in both groups [non-significant (NS)]. Treatment satisfaction was good for both insulins. Hypoglycaemia, which occurred infrequently, was observed less with detemir than glargine [rate ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.98)]. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% without hypoglycaemia in the detemir and glargine groups were 32% and 38% (NS), respectively. Weight decreased with detemir [-0.49 (3.3) kg] and increased with glargine [+1.0 (3.1) kg] (95% CI for difference: -2.17 to -0.89 kg).

CONCLUSION

While both detemir and glargine, when added to metformin therapy, improved glycaemic control, glargine resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c, while detemir demonstrated less weight gain and hypoglycaemia.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,每日一次起始使用胰岛素地特胰岛素(detemir)或甘精胰岛素(glargine)联合现有二甲双胍治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项为期 26 周的、多中心、随机、以目标为导向的试验,纳入了 457 名胰岛素初治的 T2D 成年患者(HbA1c 7-9%)。地特胰岛素或甘精胰岛素添加至当前的二甲双胍治疗中(停用任何第二种口服降糖药[OAD]),并滴定至目标空腹血糖(FPG)≤90mg/dl(≤5.0mmol/l)。主要疗效终点为 HbA1c 的变化。

结果

与基线相比,地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素分别使 HbA1c 降低 0.48 和 0.74 个百分点,分别降至 7.48%(0.91%)和 7.13%(0.72%)[估计治疗间差异为 0.30(95%CI:0.14-0.46)]。地特胰岛素在预先设定的 0.4%个百分点的非劣效性边界未得到满足。在 26 周时,分别有 38%和 53%的患者(p=0.026)达到 HbA1c≤7%,接受地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素治疗。两组的 FPG 均降低了约 43.2mg/dl(约 2.4mmol/l)[无统计学意义(NS)]。两种胰岛素的治疗满意度均良好。地特胰岛素引起的低血糖发生率低于甘精胰岛素[发生率比 0.73(95%CI 0.54-0.98)]。在未发生低血糖的情况下,地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素组达到 HbA1c≤7%的患者比例分别为 32%和 38%(NS)。地特胰岛素治疗导致体重减轻[-0.49(3.3)kg],而甘精胰岛素治疗导致体重增加[+1.0(3.1)kg](95%CI 差值:-2.17 至-0.89kg)。

结论

虽然地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗均能改善血糖控制,但甘精胰岛素可更大幅度地降低 HbA1c,而地特胰岛素导致体重增加和低血糖的风险更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验