Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Aug;15(8):729-36. doi: 10.1111/dom.12083. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin initiation using insulin detemir (detemir) or insulin glargine (glargine) added to existing metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D).
This 26-week, multinational, randomized, treat-to-target trial involved 457 insulin-naïve adults with T2D (HbA1c 7-9%). Detemir or glargine was added to current metformin therapy [any second oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) discontinued] and titrated to a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤90 mg/dl (≤5.0 mmol/l). Primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c.
Mean (s.d.) HbA1c decreased with detemir and glargine by 0.48 and 0.74%-points, respectively, to 7.48% (0.91%) and 7.13% (0.72%) [estimated between-treatment difference, 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14-0.46)]. Non-inferiority for detemir at the a priori level of 0.4%-points was not established. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% at 26 weeks were 38% and 53% (p = 0.026) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG decreased ∼43.2 mg/dl (∼2.4 mmol/l) in both groups [non-significant (NS)]. Treatment satisfaction was good for both insulins. Hypoglycaemia, which occurred infrequently, was observed less with detemir than glargine [rate ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.98)]. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% without hypoglycaemia in the detemir and glargine groups were 32% and 38% (NS), respectively. Weight decreased with detemir [-0.49 (3.3) kg] and increased with glargine [+1.0 (3.1) kg] (95% CI for difference: -2.17 to -0.89 kg).
While both detemir and glargine, when added to metformin therapy, improved glycaemic control, glargine resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c, while detemir demonstrated less weight gain and hypoglycaemia.
本研究评估了在 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者中,每日一次起始使用胰岛素地特胰岛素(detemir)或甘精胰岛素(glargine)联合现有二甲双胍治疗的疗效和安全性。
这是一项为期 26 周的、多中心、随机、以目标为导向的试验,纳入了 457 名胰岛素初治的 T2D 成年患者(HbA1c 7-9%)。地特胰岛素或甘精胰岛素添加至当前的二甲双胍治疗中(停用任何第二种口服降糖药[OAD]),并滴定至目标空腹血糖(FPG)≤90mg/dl(≤5.0mmol/l)。主要疗效终点为 HbA1c 的变化。
与基线相比,地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素分别使 HbA1c 降低 0.48 和 0.74 个百分点,分别降至 7.48%(0.91%)和 7.13%(0.72%)[估计治疗间差异为 0.30(95%CI:0.14-0.46)]。地特胰岛素在预先设定的 0.4%个百分点的非劣效性边界未得到满足。在 26 周时,分别有 38%和 53%的患者(p=0.026)达到 HbA1c≤7%,接受地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素治疗。两组的 FPG 均降低了约 43.2mg/dl(约 2.4mmol/l)[无统计学意义(NS)]。两种胰岛素的治疗满意度均良好。地特胰岛素引起的低血糖发生率低于甘精胰岛素[发生率比 0.73(95%CI 0.54-0.98)]。在未发生低血糖的情况下,地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素组达到 HbA1c≤7%的患者比例分别为 32%和 38%(NS)。地特胰岛素治疗导致体重减轻[-0.49(3.3)kg],而甘精胰岛素治疗导致体重增加[+1.0(3.1)kg](95%CI 差值:-2.17 至-0.89kg)。
虽然地特胰岛素和甘精胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗均能改善血糖控制,但甘精胰岛素可更大幅度地降低 HbA1c,而地特胰岛素导致体重增加和低血糖的风险更低。