School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire. PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.
School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire. PR1 2HE, United Kingdom.
Women Birth. 2022 Sep;35(5):e446-e455. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
Some childbearing women/birthing people prioritize out of maternity care organizational guidelines' approaches to childbirth as a way of optimizing their chances of a normal physiological birth. Currently, there is little known about the experiences of midwives who support their choices.
To explore the experiences of UK midwives employed by the NHS, who self-defined as supportive of women's alternative physiological birthing choices.
A narrative inquiry was used to collect and analyse professional stories of practice via self-written narratives and interviews. Forty-five midwives from across the UK were recruited.
Three overarching storylines were developed with nine sub-themes. 'Stories of distress' highlights challenging experiences due to poor supportive working environments, ranging from small persistent challenges to extreme situations. Conversely, 'Stories of fulfilment' offers a positive counter-narrative where midwives worked in supportive working environments enabling woman-centred care unencumbered by organisational constraints. 'Stories of transition' abridge these two polarized themes.
The midwives' experiences were mediated by their socio-cultural working contexts. Negative experiences were characterised by a misalignment between the midwives' philosophy and organisational cultures, with significant consequences for the midwives. Conversely, examples of good organisational culture and practice reveal that it is possible for organisations to fulfil their obligations for safe and positive maternity care for both childbearing women who make alternative birthing choices, and for attending staff. This highlights what is feasible and achievable within maternity organisations and offers transferable insights for organisational support of out-of-guideline care that can be adapted across the UK and beyond.
一些产妇优先选择超出产科护理组织指导方针的分娩方式,以此优化正常生理性分娩的机会。目前,对于支持这些选择的助产士的经验知之甚少。
探索英国国民保健制度中自我定义为支持妇女替代生理性分娩选择的助产士的经验。
采用叙述性探究方法,通过自我撰写的叙述和访谈收集和分析实践的专业故事。在英国各地招募了 45 名助产士。
提出了三个总体故事情节和九个子主题。“困境故事”突出了由于支持性工作环境不佳而导致的具有挑战性的经历,范围从持续存在的小挑战到极端情况。相反,“满足故事”提供了一个积极的反面叙述,助产士在支持性的工作环境中工作,不受组织限制,能够以妇女为中心提供护理。“过渡故事”缩短了这两个两极分化的主题。
助产士的经验受到其社会文化工作背景的影响。负面经验的特点是助产士的理念与组织文化之间的不匹配,这对助产士产生了重大影响。相反,良好的组织文化和实践的例子表明,组织有可能履行其为做出替代分娩选择的产妇提供安全和积极的孕产护理的义务,以及为护理人员提供支持。这突显了在孕产组织中什么是可行和可实现的,并为组织支持超出指导方针的护理提供了可在英国及其他地区借鉴的见解。