The Third Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e052528. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052528.
To date, there has been a lack of knowledge about the status, reporting completeness and methodological quality of pilot trials in the acupuncture field. Thus, this systematic review protocol aims to: (1) investigate publication trends and aspects of feasibility evaluated in acupuncture pilot trials; (2) identify the proportion of acupuncture pilot trials that lead to definitive trials and (3) assess the reporting completeness and methodological quality of pilot trials in acupuncture.
Studies of acupuncture pilot randomised controlled trials published from 2011 to 2021 will be retrieved in seven databases in January 2022, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. The methodological quality and reporting completeness of all included studies will be assessed using the risk of bias 2.0 tool (RoB 2) and the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials, respectively. For the primary analysis, publication trends, aspects of feasibility and the proportion of pilot trials that lead to definitive trials will be analysed. A quantitative analysis of the methodological quality and reporting completeness of the included trials will be implemented by calculating the percentage of items reported in each domain of RoB 2 and CONSORT. The secondary analysis will adopt a regression analysis to identify factors associated with the reporting completeness.
Ethical approval is not required for this study. This study is planned to be submitted to a peer-reviewed academic journal.
迄今为止,我们对针灸领域的试验性研究的现状、报告完整性和方法学质量知之甚少。因此,本系统评价方案旨在:(1)调查针灸试验性研究的发表趋势和评估可行性的方面;(2)确定导致确证性试验的针灸试验性研究的比例;(3)评估针灸试验性研究的报告完整性和方法学质量。
我们将于 2022 年 1 月在 7 个数据库中检索 2011 年至 2021 年发表的针灸试验性随机对照试验研究,包括 PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库和中国生物医学文献数据库。所有纳入研究的方法学质量和报告完整性将分别使用偏倚风险 2.0 工具(RoB 2)和 CONSORT 扩展用于随机试验性和可行性试验进行评估。对于主要分析,将分析发表趋势、可行性方面以及导致确证性试验的试验性研究的比例。通过计算 RoB 2 各领域和 CONSORT 中报告的项目百分比,对纳入试验的方法学质量和报告完整性进行定量分析。次要分析将采用回归分析来确定与报告完整性相关的因素。
本研究不需要伦理批准。本研究计划提交给同行评议的学术期刊。