Partners In Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 3;11(12):e054630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054630.
Evidence-based low-intensity psychological interventions such as Problem Management Plus (PM+) have the potential to expand treatment access for depression and anxiety, yet these interventions are not yet effectively implemented in rural, public health systems in resource-limited settings. In 2017, Partners In Health adapted PM+ for delivery by primary care nurses in rural Rwanda and began integrating PM+ into health centres in collaboration with the Rwandan Ministry of Health, using established implementation strategies for mental health integration into primary care (Mentoring and Enhanced Supervision at Health Centers for Mental Health (MESH MH)). A gap in the evidence regarding whether low-intensity psychological interventions can be successfully integrated into real-world primary care settings and improve outcomes for common mental disorders remains. In this study, we will rigorously evaluate the delivery of PM+ by primary care nurses, supported by MESH MH, as it is scaled across one rural district in Rwanda.
We will conduct a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study to test the clinical outcomes of routinely delivered PM+ and to describe the implementation of PM+ at health centres. To study the clinical effectiveness of PM+, we will use a pragmatic, randomised multiple baseline design to determine whether participants experience improvement in depression symptoms (measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and functioning (measured by the WHO-Disability Assessment Scale Brief 2.0) after receiving PM+. We will employ quantitative and qualitative methods to describe and evaluate PM+ implementation outcomes using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance framework, using routinely collected programme data and semistructured interviews.
This evaluation was approved by the Rwanda National Ethics Committee (Protocol #196/RNEC/2019) and deemed exempt by the Harvard University Institutional Review Board. The results from this evaluation will be useful for health systems planners and policy-makers working to translate the evidence base for low-intensity psychological interventions into practice.
循证的低强度心理干预措施,如问题管理加(PM+),有可能扩大对抑郁和焦虑的治疗途径,但这些干预措施在资源有限的环境下的农村公共卫生系统中尚未得到有效实施。2017 年,健康伙伴组织(Partners In Health)将 PM+改编为卢旺达农村地区的初级保健护士实施,并开始与卢旺达卫生部合作,将 PM+整合到卫生中心,利用既定的心理健康融入初级保健的实施策略(卫生中心的心理健康辅导和强化监督(MESH MH))。目前仍缺乏关于低强度心理干预措施是否可以成功地融入现实世界的初级保健环境并改善常见精神障碍的结果的证据。在这项研究中,我们将严格评估在 MESH MH 的支持下,由初级保健护士提供的 PM+的实施情况,因为它正在卢旺达的一个农村地区推广。
我们将进行一项混合 1 型有效性-实施研究,以测试常规提供的 PM+的临床效果,并描述 PM+在卫生中心的实施情况。为了研究 PM+的临床效果,我们将使用实用的随机多基线设计来确定参与者在接受 PM+后是否会改善抑郁症状(用患者健康问卷-9 测量)和功能(用世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0 简短版测量)。我们将使用定量和定性方法,根据 Reach、Effectiveness、Adoption、Implementation 和 Maintenance 框架,使用常规收集的项目数据和半结构化访谈来描述和评估 PM+的实施结果。
这项评估得到了卢旺达国家伦理委员会的批准(协议 #196/RNEC/2019),并被哈佛大学机构审查委员会视为豁免。这项评估的结果将对卫生系统规划者和政策制定者非常有用,他们正在努力将低强度心理干预措施的证据基础转化为实践。