Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville TN 37232, USA; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, 924 E. 57(th) St, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Department of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 Medical Center Dr, Nashville TN 37232, USA.
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Dec;94:315-320. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.10.025. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
This study's aim was to investigate prevalence of four non-motor symptoms in patients with cervical dystonia and healthy controls to explore whether the presence of multiple non-motor features is associated with cervical dystonia diagnosis. Fifteen patients with cervical dystonia and 15 healthy controls underwent non-invasive testing of spatial discrimination threshold, temporal discrimination threshold, vibration-induced illusion of movement, and kinesthesia. All spatial discrimination threshold, temporal discrimination threshold, and vibration-induced illusion of movement measures were converted to standardized Z scores with scores >2.0 considered abnormal. Any incorrect kinesthesia response was considered abnormal. Prevalence of each abnormal non-motor feature was compared between groups using a chi-squared test. A higher proportion of patients with cervical dystonia had abnormal spatial discrimination threshold (p = 0.01) and abnormal kinesthesia (p = 0.03) scores compared to healthy control subjects. There were no significant differences between the proportion of patients with cervical dystonia versus healthy controls for abnormal temporal discrimination threshold (p = 0.07) or abnormal vibration-induced illusion of movement (p = 0.14). Forty-seven percent of patients with cervical dystonia (7/15) demonstrated one abnormal non-motor feature, 20% (3/15) displayed two abnormal features, and 13% (2/15) displayed three abnormal features. Kinesthesia was the only non-motor feature identified as abnormal in the control group (20%, 3/15). All four tests demonstrated high specificity (80-100%) and low-moderate sensitivity (13-60%). These findings suggest that non-motor feature testing, specifically for spatial discrimination threshold and kinesthesia, could be a highly specific diagnostic tool to inform cervical dystonia diagnosis. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings.
本研究旨在调查颈源性肌张力障碍患者和健康对照者中四种非运动症状的患病率,以探讨是否存在多种非运动特征与颈源性肌张力障碍的诊断有关。15 例颈源性肌张力障碍患者和 15 例健康对照者接受了空间辨别阈、时间辨别阈、振动诱发运动错觉和运动觉的非侵入性测试。所有空间辨别阈、时间辨别阈和振动诱发运动错觉的测量值均转换为标准化 Z 分数,得分>2.0 被认为异常。任何不正确的运动觉反应都被认为是异常的。采用卡方检验比较组间各异常非运动特征的患病率。与健康对照组相比,颈源性肌张力障碍患者的空间辨别阈异常(p=0.01)和运动觉异常(p=0.03)的比例更高。颈源性肌张力障碍患者与健康对照组之间,时间辨别阈异常(p=0.07)或振动诱发运动错觉异常(p=0.14)的比例无显著差异。47%(7/15)的颈源性肌张力障碍患者表现出一种异常的非运动特征,20%(3/15)表现出两种异常特征,13%(2/15)表现出三种异常特征。运动觉是唯一在对照组中被识别为异常的非运动特征(20%,3/15)。所有四项测试均表现出高特异性(80-100%)和低-中度敏感性(13-60%)。这些发现表明,非运动特征测试,特别是空间辨别阈和运动觉测试,可能是一种高度特异的诊断工具,可以为颈源性肌张力障碍的诊断提供信息。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。