Ahmad Aziz, Mishra Rajesh
School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
School of Biotechnology, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India.
Biophys Chem. 2022 Feb;281:106733. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2021.106733. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
Polyol and sugar osmolytes are known to enhance the stability of proteins, however, their role in assisting protein folding is not well understood. We asked whether these osmolytes have the same effect during refolding of a pair of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins. Herein, we have chosen α-amylases from Bacillus licheniformis (BLA) and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (BAA) as thermophilic like and mesophilic counterparts respectively, having similar structures but differing thermostability. The effect of a series of polyols with varying number of -OH groups from 2 to 6 (Ethylene glycol, glycerol, erythritol, xylitol and sorbitol) and sugars (trehalose and sucrose) has been studied on the refolding of BLA and BAA. Our study demonstrates that glycerol, sorbitol and trehalose are the efficient cosolvents for BAA refolding, while comparatively less effective for BLA. Urea induced destabilization of BLA and BAA is differently compensated by polyol and sugar osmolytes during refolding. This suggests that the early species formed during BLA and BAA refolding are differently susceptible towards urea, indicating differential nature of their refolding pathways. Addition of trehalose at different times during refolding showed that the presence of trehalose is essential at the early stages of refolding. It is one of the first systematic study wherein the comparative effect of polyol and sugar assisted refolding of thermophilic and mesophilic protein has been carried out. The study highlights the differential effect of protein-osmolyte interactions during refolding of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins which may have implications in protein formulations, refolding and inhibition of aggregation.
多元醇和糖类渗透剂已知可增强蛋白质的稳定性,然而,它们在协助蛋白质折叠过程中的作用尚未得到充分理解。我们探究了这些渗透剂在一对嗜热和嗜温蛋白质复性过程中是否具有相同的效果。在此,我们分别选择了地衣芽孢杆菌(BLA)和解淀粉芽孢杆菌(BAA)的α-淀粉酶作为嗜热型和嗜温型对应物,它们具有相似的结构但热稳定性不同。研究了一系列具有2至6个-OH基团数量不同的多元醇(乙二醇、甘油、赤藓糖醇、木糖醇和山梨醇)以及糖类(海藻糖和蔗糖)对BLA和BAA复性的影响。我们的研究表明,甘油、山梨醇和海藻糖是BAA复性的有效共溶剂,而对BLA的效果相对较差。在复性过程中,尿素诱导的BLA和BAA的不稳定由多元醇和糖类渗透剂以不同方式补偿。这表明在BLA和BAA复性过程中形成的早期物种对尿素的敏感性不同,表明它们复性途径的差异性质。在复性过程的不同时间添加海藻糖表明,海藻糖的存在在复性早期至关重要。这是首次对多元醇和糖类协助嗜热和嗜温蛋白质复性的比较效果进行的系统研究之一。该研究突出了嗜热和嗜温蛋白质复性过程中蛋白质-渗透剂相互作用的差异效应,这可能对蛋白质制剂、复性和聚集抑制具有重要意义。