• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国警察使用武力标准与心理健康危机:确定研究与政策制定目标。

Police use of force standards and mental health crises in the United States: Identifying research and policymaking targets.

作者信息

Zelle Heather, Kelley Sharon, Agee Elisha R, Siebert W Luke

机构信息

Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Department of Public Health Sciences, P.O. Box 800660, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, School of Medicine, P.O. Box 800660, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

出版信息

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;80:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101750. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101750
PMID:34864333
Abstract

An area of psychology-law research and policy that requires increased attention is the use of force during encounters with someone in mental health crisis. Cases in which law enforcement officer (LEO) intervention during a mental health crisis leads to injury or death of the person in crisis underscore the need to understand what behaviors and circumstances are relevant in excessive force litigation, what concepts may benefit from empirical research, and what facets of policies and precedent may require modification. In particular, the current national and international attention to the United States' external mechanisms of control over police conduct (i.e., criminal and civil proceedings against officers) suggests that excessive force jurisprudence is ripe for examination of its utility and fairness in shaping how police should interact with people with mental illness. Excessive force jurisprudence contains complex legal standards with which many psychology-law practitioners, researchers, and even policymakers are likely unfamiliar, however. The current paper explicates external methods of control over police conduct in the United States by reviewing excessive force jurisprudence and identifying points in need of research and policy attention.

摘要

心理学与法律研究及政策中一个需要更多关注的领域是在应对处于心理健康危机中的人时使用武力的情况。在心理健康危机期间执法人员(LEO)的干预导致处于危机中的人受伤或死亡的案例凸显了理解在过度使用武力诉讼中哪些行为和情况是相关的、哪些概念可能从实证研究中受益以及政策和先例的哪些方面可能需要修改的必要性。特别是,当前国内和国际对美国控制警察行为的外部机制(即对警察的刑事和民事诉讼)的关注表明,过度使用武力的判例法在审视其在塑造警察应如何与精神疾病患者互动方面的效用和公平性方面已经成熟。然而,过度使用武力的判例法包含许多心理学与法律从业者、研究人员甚至政策制定者可能不熟悉的复杂法律标准。本文通过回顾过度使用武力的判例法并确定需要研究和政策关注的要点,阐述了美国控制警察行为的外部方法。

相似文献

1
Police use of force standards and mental health crises in the United States: Identifying research and policymaking targets.美国警察使用武力标准与心理健康危机:确定研究与政策制定目标。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2022 Jan-Feb;80:101750. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101750. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
2
What can we expect of police in the face of deficient mental health systems? Qualitative insights from Chicago police officers.面对心理健康系统的不足,我们能对警察抱有什么期望?来自芝加哥警察的定性见解。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Feb;28(1):28-42. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12691. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
3
The influence of neighborhood characteristics on police officers' encounters with persons suspected to have a serious mental illness.社区特征对警察与疑似患有严重精神疾病者接触情况的影响。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(4):359-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.006. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
4
Challenges for people with intellectual disabilities in law enforcement interactions in Ireland; thematic analysis informed by 1537 person-years' experience.爱尔兰执法互动中智障人士面临的挑战;基于 1537 人年经验的主题分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;75:101683. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101683. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
5
Understanding how police officers think about mental/emotional disturbance calls.了解警察如何看待涉及精神/情绪困扰的报警电话。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2014 Jul-Aug;37(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
6
The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Effective Law Enforcement.心理科学对美国警务工作的影响:程序正义、合法性与有效执法
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015 Dec;16(3):75-109. doi: 10.1177/1529100615617791.
7
Contextual Factors of Mental Health Crisis Calls to Law Enforcement: A Brief Report.向执法部门拨打心理健康危机求助电话的情境因素:简要报告
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Feb;60(2):403-409. doi: 10.1007/s10597-023-01185-z. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Incorporating mental health literacy and trauma-informed law enforcement: A participative survey on police officers' attitudes and knowledge concerning mental disorders, traumatization, and trauma sensitivity.将心理健康素养和创伤知情执法相结合:一项关于警察对精神障碍、创伤和创伤敏感性的态度和知识的参与式调查。
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Feb;14(2):218-228. doi: 10.1037/tra0001067. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
9
Everyday police work during mental health encounters: A study of call resolutions in Chicago and their implications for diversion.心理健康事件中的日常警务工作:芝加哥呼叫解决方案研究及其对分流的影响
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Sep;35(5-6):442-455. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2324. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
10
Countywide implementation of crisis intervention teams: Multiple methods, measures and sustained outcomes.全县范围内危机干预团队的实施:多种方法、措施及持续成果。
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Sep;35(5-6):456-469. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2305. Epub 2017 Oct 5.