School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Diabet Med. 2022 Mar;39(3):e14759. doi: 10.1111/dme.14759. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
Acceptable and accessible interventions are needed to address 'psychological insulin resistance', which is a common barrier to insulin uptake among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Our aim was to test the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) study design and acceptability of a theoretically grounded, psycho-educational, web-based resource to reduce negative insulin appraisals among adults with T2D.
A double-blinded, parallel group, two-arm pilot RCT (1:1), comparing intervention with active control (existing online information about insulin). Eligible participants were Australian adults with T2D, taking oral diabetes medications.
prior use of injectable medicines; being 'very willing' to commence insulin. Primary outcomes: study feasibility (recruitment ease, protocol fulfilment, attrition, data completeness); secondary outcomes: intervention acceptability (intervention engagement, user feedback) and likely efficacy (negative Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale [ITAS] scores at follow-up). Online surveys completed at baseline and 2 weeks.
During 4-week recruitment, 76 people expressed interest: 51 eligible and 35 enrolled (intervention = 17, control = 18; median[interquartile range] age = 62[53, 69] years; 17 women). Protocol fulfilment achieved by 26 (74%) participants (n = 13 per arm), with low participant attrition (n = 6, 17%). Intervention acceptability was high (>80% endorsement, except format preference = 60%). ITAS negative scores differed between-groups at follow-up (M diff = -6.5, 95% confidence interval: -10.7 to -2.4), favouring the intervention.
This novel web-based resource ("Is insulin right for me?") is acceptable and associated with a likely reduction in negative insulin appraisals, relative to existing resources. This pilot shows the study design is feasible and supports conduct of a fully powered RCT.
需要可接受且可获取的干预措施来解决“心理胰岛素抵抗”问题,这是成年人 2 型糖尿病(T2D)接受胰岛素治疗的常见障碍。我们的目的是测试一项随机对照试验(RCT)研究设计的可行性,以及一种基于理论的、心理教育的、基于网络的资源的可接受性,该资源旨在减少 T2D 成年人对胰岛素的负面评价。
一项双盲、平行组、双臂试验性 RCT(1:1),比较干预组与活性对照组(关于胰岛素的现有在线信息)。合格的参与者是澳大利亚 T2D 成年人,服用口服糖尿病药物。
既往使用注射药物;“非常愿意”开始使用胰岛素。主要结果:研究可行性(招募容易程度、方案完成情况、脱落率、数据完整性);次要结果:干预接受度(干预参与度、用户反馈)和可能的疗效(随访时的负面胰岛素治疗评价量表[ITAS]评分)。基线和 2 周时完成在线调查。
在 4 周的招募期间,有 76 人表示有兴趣:51 人符合条件,35 人入组(干预组 17 人,对照组 18 人;中位[四分位距]年龄 62[53, 69]岁;17 名女性)。26 名(74%)参与者(每组 13 名)完成了方案,参与者脱落率低(n=6,17%)。干预接受度很高(>80%的支持率,除了格式偏好为 60%)。随访时两组间 ITAS 负分有差异(M 差值=-6.5,95%置信区间:-10.7 至-2.4),干预组更有利。
这种新的基于网络的资源(“胰岛素适合我吗?”)是可以接受的,与现有的资源相比,它可能会降低对胰岛素的负面评价。这项试验表明,研究设计是可行的,并支持进行全面的 RCT。