Suppr超能文献

“胰岛素适合我吗?”:一项关于减少 2 型糖尿病成人对胰岛素治疗心理障碍的基于网络的干预措施的可行性随机对照试验和可接受性的试点研究。

'Is insulin right for me?': Feasibility of a pilot randomised controlled trial and acceptability of a web-based intervention to reduce psychological barriers to insulin therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Diabet Med. 2022 Mar;39(3):e14759. doi: 10.1111/dme.14759. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

Abstract

AIMS

Acceptable and accessible interventions are needed to address 'psychological insulin resistance', which is a common barrier to insulin uptake among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Our aim was to test the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) study design and acceptability of a theoretically grounded, psycho-educational, web-based resource to reduce negative insulin appraisals among adults with T2D.

METHODS

A double-blinded, parallel group, two-arm pilot RCT (1:1), comparing intervention with active control (existing online information about insulin). Eligible participants were Australian adults with T2D, taking oral diabetes medications.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

prior use of injectable medicines; being 'very willing' to commence insulin. Primary outcomes: study feasibility (recruitment ease, protocol fulfilment, attrition, data completeness); secondary outcomes: intervention acceptability (intervention engagement, user feedback) and likely efficacy (negative Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale [ITAS] scores at follow-up). Online surveys completed at baseline and 2 weeks.

RESULTS

During 4-week recruitment, 76 people expressed interest: 51 eligible and 35 enrolled (intervention = 17, control = 18; median[interquartile range] age = 62[53, 69] years; 17 women). Protocol fulfilment achieved by 26 (74%) participants (n = 13 per arm), with low participant attrition (n = 6, 17%). Intervention acceptability was high (>80% endorsement, except format preference = 60%). ITAS negative scores differed between-groups at follow-up (M diff = -6.5, 95% confidence interval: -10.7 to -2.4), favouring the intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel web-based resource ("Is insulin right for me?") is acceptable and associated with a likely reduction in negative insulin appraisals, relative to existing resources. This pilot shows the study design is feasible and supports conduct of a fully powered RCT.

摘要

目的

需要可接受且可获取的干预措施来解决“心理胰岛素抵抗”问题,这是成年人 2 型糖尿病(T2D)接受胰岛素治疗的常见障碍。我们的目的是测试一项随机对照试验(RCT)研究设计的可行性,以及一种基于理论的、心理教育的、基于网络的资源的可接受性,该资源旨在减少 T2D 成年人对胰岛素的负面评价。

方法

一项双盲、平行组、双臂试验性 RCT(1:1),比较干预组与活性对照组(关于胰岛素的现有在线信息)。合格的参与者是澳大利亚 T2D 成年人,服用口服糖尿病药物。

排除标准

既往使用注射药物;“非常愿意”开始使用胰岛素。主要结果:研究可行性(招募容易程度、方案完成情况、脱落率、数据完整性);次要结果:干预接受度(干预参与度、用户反馈)和可能的疗效(随访时的负面胰岛素治疗评价量表[ITAS]评分)。基线和 2 周时完成在线调查。

结果

在 4 周的招募期间,有 76 人表示有兴趣:51 人符合条件,35 人入组(干预组 17 人,对照组 18 人;中位[四分位距]年龄 62[53, 69]岁;17 名女性)。26 名(74%)参与者(每组 13 名)完成了方案,参与者脱落率低(n=6,17%)。干预接受度很高(>80%的支持率,除了格式偏好为 60%)。随访时两组间 ITAS 负分有差异(M 差值=-6.5,95%置信区间:-10.7 至-2.4),干预组更有利。

结论

这种新的基于网络的资源(“胰岛素适合我吗?”)是可以接受的,与现有的资源相比,它可能会降低对胰岛素的负面评价。这项试验表明,研究设计是可行的,并支持进行全面的 RCT。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验