Butch R J, Stark D D, Wittenberg J, Tepper J E, Saini S, Simeone J F, Mueller P R, Ferrucci J T
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Jun;146(6):1155-60. doi: 10.2214/ajr.146.6.1155.
Sixteen patients with known rectal cancer were evaluated and staged with CT and MR, and at surgery. Detailed evaluation of the pathologic specimens was performed and correlated with CT and MR to determine the accuracy of staging. Most of the cases were advanced stages, and both CT and MR were equally effective in staging. Prone positioning using an air-distension technique was equally important for CT and MR examinations. Because of a positive contrast material (iodine), adequate CT examinations could be performed without prior bowel preparation; however, bowel cleansing was necessary for MR examinations. Both techniques could identify the primary tumor and invasion into perirectal fat and local organs. Neither CT nor MR were able to assess the extent of bowel-wall infiltration or tumor spread to normal size perirectal lymph nodes.
对16例已知直肠癌患者进行了CT和MR评估及分期,并在手术时进行了评估。对病理标本进行了详细评估,并与CT和MR进行对比,以确定分期的准确性。大多数病例为晚期,CT和MR在分期方面同样有效。采用空气扩张技术的俯卧位对CT和MR检查同样重要。由于使用了阳性造影剂(碘),无需事先进行肠道准备即可进行充分的CT检查;然而,MR检查则需要进行肠道清洁。两种技术都能识别原发肿瘤以及对直肠周围脂肪和局部器官的侵犯。CT和MR均无法评估肠壁浸润程度或肿瘤向正常大小的直肠周围淋巴结的扩散情况。