Adepu Kiran Kumar, Kachhap Sangita, Anishkin Andriy, Chintapalli Sree V
Arkansas Children's Nutrition Center, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland.
Bioinform Biol Insights. 2021 Nov 27;15:11779322211056122. doi: 10.1177/11779322211056122. eCollection 2021.
The transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor GPR109A has been previously shown to function as a receptor for niacin in mediating antilipolytic effects. Although administration of high doses of niacin has shown beneficial effects on lipid metabolism, however, it is often accompanied by disturbing side effects such as flushing, liver damage, glucose intolerance, or gastrointestinal problems. Thus, it is important to understand niacin-GPR109A interactions, which can be beneficial for the development of alternate drugs having antilipolytic effects with less or no side effects. To get into the structural insights on niacin binding to GPR109A, we have performed 100 nanoseconds long all-atom MD simulations of five niacin-GPR109A complexes (automatically docked pose 0, and randomly placed niacin in poses 1 to 4 in the receptor crevice) and analyzed using binding free energy calculations and H-bond analysis. Steered MD simulations were used to get an average force for niacin translocation between the bulk and the external crevice of the wild type and mutant (N86Y, W91 S, S178I, and triple mutant of all three residues) GPR109A receptors, as well as GPR109B (as a control that does not bind niacin). The H-bond analysis revealed that TMH3 residue R111 interacts with niacin in a total of 4 (poses 0 to 3) complexes, while residues C177, S178, and S179 contact niacin in complex pose 4, and all these complexes were energetically stable. According to steered MD simulations, all the GPR109A mutants and GPR109B required greater force than that of wild-type GPR109A to translocate in the external crevice, suggesting increased sterical obstacles. Thus, the residues N86 (at the junction of TMH2/ECL2), W91 (ECL2), R111 (TMH3), and ECL3 residues (C177, S178, S179) play an important role for optimal routing of niacin entry and to bind GPR109A.
跨膜G蛋白偶联受体GPR109A先前已被证明在介导抗脂解作用中作为烟酸的受体发挥功能。尽管高剂量烟酸的给药已显示出对脂质代谢有益的作用,然而,它常常伴随着诸如潮红、肝损伤、葡萄糖不耐受或胃肠道问题等令人困扰的副作用。因此,了解烟酸与GPR109A的相互作用很重要,这对于开发具有抗脂解作用且副作用较少或无副作用的替代药物可能有益。为了深入了解烟酸与GPR109A结合的结构见解,我们对五个烟酸 - GPR109A复合物(自动对接的构象0,以及在受体裂隙中构象1至4随机放置的烟酸)进行了100纳秒长的全原子分子动力学模拟,并使用结合自由能计算和氢键分析进行了分析。使用引导分子动力学模拟来获得野生型和突变型(N86Y、W91S、S178I以及所有三个残基的三重突变体)GPR109A受体以及GPR109B(作为不结合烟酸的对照)的主体与外部裂隙之间烟酸转运的平均力。氢键分析表明,跨膜螺旋3(TMH3)残基R111在总共4个(构象0至3)复合物中与烟酸相互作用,而残基C177、S178和S179在复合物构象4中与烟酸接触,并且所有这些复合物在能量上都是稳定的。根据引导分子动力学模拟,所有GPR109A突变体和GPR109B在外部裂隙中转运所需的力都比野生型GPR109A更大,这表明空间位阻增加。因此,残基N86(在跨膜螺旋2/细胞外环2(TMH2/ECL2)的交界处)、W91(ECL2)、R111(TMH3)以及ECL3残基(C177、S178、S179)对于烟酸进入的最佳路径以及与GPR109A结合起着重要作用。