Grubb Caitlyn J, Bergeria Cecilia L, Huhn Andrew S, Dunn Kelly E
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 12;12:698645. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.698645. eCollection 2021.
Increases in opioid-related overdose and death have led to increases in the number of organs available for donation and transplant, however persons who have a substance use disorder (SUD) may be disadvantaged relative to other health conditions with regard to receiving an organ for transplant. This study aimed to evaluate perceptions regarding acceptability and priority for organ donation vs. a control condition (resuscitation) for hypothetical persons with nine target health conditions including a substance use disorder, among persons recruited as part of an online survey. Respondents ( = 285; male = 172, female = 113) recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk rated acceptability and priority that hypothetical persons representing nine target health conditions expected to influence transplant success (including a SUD) receive an organ transplant and resuscitation via a survey hosted by Qualtrics. Primary outcomes of stigma ratings and priority ranking of persons as a function of the hypothetical target health condition were analyzed using Repeated Measures Analyses of Variance and Bonferroni-corrected -tests. Demographic information was presented descriptively for all respondents. Ratings for acceptability and priority for persons who had a SUD were generally lower than ratings for other conditions for both organ for transplant and resuscitation, though respondents reported less stigma toward resuscitation, = 22.35, <0.001 overall. Respondents were least supportive of persons who smoked cigarettes receiving an organ, 's < 0.001. Priority rankings favored persons who were young or had a history of heart disease. Multivariable models determined that target health condition, = 33.64, < 0.001, was a better and more consistent predictor of response than demographic variables that were examined. Data suggest that general perception of acceptability and priority ranking for receipt of life-saving interventions was lower for persons who have a SUD relative to other clinically-relevant health conditions. Research to examine this effect among persons working in the donation system are warranted and efforts to reduce stigma toward persons who have a SUD should be continued.
与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡人数的增加导致了可用于捐赠和移植的器官数量增加,然而,患有物质使用障碍(SUD)的人在接受器官移植方面可能相对于其他健康状况处于不利地位。本研究旨在评估在一项在线调查中招募的人群对于患有包括物质使用障碍在内的九种目标健康状况的假设人群进行器官捐赠与对照情况(复苏)的可接受性和优先级的看法。从亚马逊土耳其机器人平台招募的受访者(n = 285;男性 = 172,女性 = 113)通过Qualtrics主持的一项调查,对代表九种目标健康状况(包括物质使用障碍)的假设人群接受器官移植和复苏的可接受性和优先级进行了评分。使用重复测量方差分析和Bonferroni校正的t检验分析了作为假设目标健康状况函数的耻辱感评分和人员优先级排名的主要结果。对所有受访者的人口统计学信息进行了描述性呈现。对于患有物质使用障碍的人的移植器官和复苏的可接受性和优先级评分通常低于其他状况,不过受访者对复苏的耻辱感较低,总体p = 22.35,p <0.001。受访者最不支持吸烟的人接受器官,p <0.001。优先级排名有利于年轻人或有心脏病史的人。多变量模型确定,目标健康状况,p = 33.64,p <0.001,是比所检查的人口统计学变量更好且更一致的反应预测指标。数据表明,相对于其他临床相关健康状况,患有物质使用障碍的人对于接受救生干预措施的可接受性和优先级排名的总体看法较低。有必要对捐赠系统工作人员中的这种影响进行研究,并且应该继续努力减少对患有物质使用障碍的人的耻辱感。