• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

间隔、反馈和测试可提升网络应用程序中的词汇学习效果。

Spacing, Feedback, and Testing Boost Vocabulary Learning in a Web Application.

作者信息

Belardi Angelo, Pedrett Salome, Rothen Nicolas, Reber Thomas P

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, UniDistance Suisse, Brig, Switzerland.

Department of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 15;12:757262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.757262. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.757262
PMID:34867656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8638698/
Abstract

Information and communication technology (ICT) becomes more prevalent in education but its general efficacy and that of specific learning applications are not fully established yet. One way to further improve learning applications could be to use insights from fundamental memory research. We here assess whether four established learning principles (spacing, corrective feedback, testing, and multimodality) can be translated into an applied ICT context to facilitate vocabulary learning in a self-developed web application. Effects on the amount of newly learned vocabulary were assessed in a mixed factorial design (3×2×2×2) with the independent variables Spacing (between-subjects; one, two, or four sessions), Feedback (within-subjects; with or without), Testing (within-subjects, 70 or 30% retrieval trials), and Multimodality (within-subjects; unimodal or multimodal). Data from 79 participants revealed significant main effects for Spacing [(2,76) = 8.51, = 0.0005, ] and Feedback [(1,76) = 21.38, < 0.0001, ], and a significant interaction between Feedback and Testing [(1,76) = 14.12, = 0.0003, ]. Optimal Spacing and the presence of corrective Feedback in combination with Testing together boost learning by 29% as compared to non-optimal realizations (massed learning, testing with the lack of corrective feedback). Our findings indicate that established learning principles derived from basic memory research can successfully be implemented in web applications to optimize vocabulary learning.

摘要

信息通信技术(ICT)在教育中越来越普遍,但其总体效果以及特定学习应用的效果尚未完全确立。进一步改进学习应用的一种方法可能是借鉴基础记忆研究的见解。我们在此评估四个既定的学习原则(间隔、纠正性反馈、测试和多模态)是否可以转化为应用ICT环境,以促进在一个自主开发的网络应用程序中学习词汇。在一个混合因子设计(3×2×2×2)中评估对新学词汇量的影响,自变量包括间隔(组间;一次、两次或四次课程)、反馈(组内;有或无)、测试(组内,70%或30%的检索试验)和多模态(组内;单模态或多模态)。来自79名参与者的数据显示,间隔[F(2,76)=8.51,p = 0.0005,η² = 0.20]和反馈[F(1,76)=21.38,p < 0.0001,η² = 0.22]有显著的主效应,以及反馈和测试之间有显著的交互作用[F(1,76)=14.12,p = 0.0003,η² = 0.15]。与非最优实现方式(集中学习、缺乏纠正性反馈的测试)相比,最优间隔以及纠正性反馈与测试相结合可使学习提高29%。我们的研究结果表明,源自基础记忆研究的既定学习原则可以成功地在网络应用程序中实施,以优化词汇学习。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/9f26f183de8d/fpsyg-12-757262-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/03986644face/fpsyg-12-757262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/c9f95d0fb7f9/fpsyg-12-757262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/3bf090f6380f/fpsyg-12-757262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/dbdaaffde44d/fpsyg-12-757262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/9f26f183de8d/fpsyg-12-757262-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/03986644face/fpsyg-12-757262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/c9f95d0fb7f9/fpsyg-12-757262-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/3bf090f6380f/fpsyg-12-757262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/dbdaaffde44d/fpsyg-12-757262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94cb/8638698/9f26f183de8d/fpsyg-12-757262-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Spacing, Feedback, and Testing Boost Vocabulary Learning in a Web Application.间隔、反馈和测试可提升网络应用程序中的词汇学习效果。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 15;12:757262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.757262. eCollection 2021.
2
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Technological aids for the rehabilitation of memory and executive functioning in children and adolescents with acquired brain injury.脑损伤儿童和青少年记忆与执行功能康复的技术辅助手段。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 1;7(7):CD011020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011020.pub2.
5
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
7
Home telemonitoring and remote feedback between clinic visits for asthma.哮喘患者门诊就诊期间的家庭远程监测与远程反馈
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 3;2016(8):CD011714. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011714.pub2.
8
Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients.改善医院住院患者抗生素处方行为的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 9;2(2):CD003543. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003543.pub4.
9
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).结石病专家对尿路结石的管理(2025年结石病专家共识)
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
10
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-Analysis on Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Applications: Benefits and Risks.移动辅助语言学习应用的元分析:益处与风险
Psychol Belg. 2022 Sep 16;62(1):252-271. doi: 10.5334/pb.1146. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Educational App-Development needs to be informed by the Cognitive Neurosciences of Learning & Memory.教育应用程序的开发需要以学习与记忆的认知神经科学为依据。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2018 Dec 21;3:22. doi: 10.1038/s41539-018-0039-4. eCollection 2018.
2
Teaching the science of learning.传授学习科学。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
3
Does prediction error drive one-shot declarative learning?预测误差会驱动一次性陈述性学习吗?
J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:149-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.11.001.
4
Variables associated with achievement in higher education: A systematic review of meta-analyses.与高等教育成就相关的变量:元分析的系统综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;143(6):565-600. doi: 10.1037/bul0000098. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
5
Learning from Errors.从错误中学习。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2017 Jan 3;68:465-489. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
6
Desirable Difficulties in Vocabulary Learning.词汇学习中的理想困难
Am J Psychol. 2015 Summer;128(2):241-52. doi: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0241.
7
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect.测试与重测对保持效果的影响:测试效应的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1432-63. doi: 10.1037/a0037559. Epub 2014 Aug 25.
8
Probabilistic classification learning with corrective feedback is associated with in vivo striatal dopamine release in the ventral striatum, while learning without feedback is not.有纠正反馈的概率分类学习与腹侧纹状体的体内纹状体多巴胺释放有关,而无反馈学习则不然。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Oct;35(10):5106-15. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22536. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
9
MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis.MorePower 6.0 用于具有关系置信区间和贝叶斯分析的方差分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1255-65. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0186-0.
10
Computer-based learning of spelling skills in children with and without dyslexia.计算机辅助学习拼写技能在阅读障碍儿童和非阅读障碍儿童中的应用。
Ann Dyslexia. 2011 Dec;61(2):177-200. doi: 10.1007/s11881-011-0052-2. Epub 2011 May 12.