Pina Rodrigues Ana, Castelo-Branco Miguel, van Asselen Marieke
Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), Institute of Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 15;12:769237. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769237. eCollection 2021.
Abnormal exogenous attention orienting and diffused spatial distribution of attention have been associated with reading impairment in children with developmental dyslexia. However, studies in adults have failed to replicate such relationships. The goal of the present study was to address this issue by assessing exogenous visual attention and its peripheral spatial distribution in adults with developmental dyslexia. We measured response times, accuracy and eye movements of 18 dyslexics and 19 typical readers in a cued discrimination paradigm, in which stimuli were presented at different peripheral eccentricities. Results showed that adults with developmental dyslexia were slower that controls in using their mechanisms of exogenous attention orienting. Moreover, we found that while controls became slower with the increase of eccentricity, dyslexics showed an abnormal inflection at 10° as well as similar response times at the most distant eccentricities. Finally, dyslexics show attentional facilitation deficits above 12° of eccentricity, suggesting an attentional engagement deficit at far periphery. Taken together, our findings indicate that, in dyslexia, the temporal deficits in orientation of attention and its abnormal peripheral spatial distribution are not restricted to childhood and persist into adulthood. Our results are, therefore, consistent with the hypothesis that the neural network underlying selective spatial attention is disrupted in dyslexia.
外源性注意力定向异常和注意力的分散空间分布与发育性阅读障碍儿童的阅读障碍有关。然而,针对成人的研究未能重现这种关系。本研究的目的是通过评估发育性阅读障碍成人的外源性视觉注意力及其外周空间分布来解决这一问题。我们在一个线索辨别范式中测量了18名阅读障碍者和19名正常阅读者的反应时间、准确性和眼动,在该范式中,刺激呈现于不同的外周离心率。结果显示,发育性阅读障碍成人在运用其外源性注意力定向机制方面比对照组慢。此外,我们发现,虽然对照组随着离心率的增加而变慢,但阅读障碍者在10°时出现异常拐点,并且在最远的离心率处有相似的反应时间。最后,阅读障碍者在离心率超过12°时表现出注意力促进缺陷,表明在远外周存在注意力参与缺陷。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,在阅读障碍中,注意力定向的时间缺陷及其异常的外周空间分布并不局限于儿童期,而是持续到成年期。因此,我们的结果与以下假设一致,即阅读障碍中选择性空间注意力的神经网络受到破坏。