Suppr超能文献

关节内桡骨远端骨折的联合治疗方法:病例系列及文献回顾。

Combined Approach for Intra-articular Distal Radius Fracture: A Case Series and Literature Review.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(4):529-538. doi: 10.4055/cios20291. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to classify the possible indications for a combined approach to distal radius fractures (DRFs) by investigating surgical outcomes of patients treated according to our treatment algorithm.

METHODS

A combined approach was performed in 32 patients. Patients who were thought to need a combined approach were classified into three types according to the combined injuries associated with loss of volar cortical buttresses in DRFs. The classifications included the following: type 1, free intra-articular fragments; type 2, distally migrated dorsal fragments located beyond the wrist joint; and type 3, centrally impacted articular fragments and displaced dorsal fragments, not reduced by indirect methods.

RESULTS

Seven patients had type 1 fractures treated with volar plates and excision of the intra-articular fragments. Fourteen patients had type 2 fractures: 12 were treated with volar plates and excision of dorsal fragments, and 2 with relatively large unstable dorsal fragments were treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. The remaining 11 patients had type 3 fractures treated with combined volar and dorsal plates. At the latest follow-up, the radiographs revealed an average of 16.9° of radial inclination, an average of 4.2° of volar tilt, and an average of 7.5 mm of radial height. According to the Garland and Werley scores, the functional results were excellent for 3 patients, good for 25, and fair for 4.

CONCLUSIONS

The classification system indicated when an additional dorsal approach was needed in unstable DRFs, and it may establish useful guidelines for appropriate surgical decision-making.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在通过研究根据我们的治疗方案治疗的患者的手术结果,对桡骨远端骨折(DRF)的联合治疗方法的可能适应证进行分类。

方法

对 32 例患者采用联合入路。根据与 DRF 掌侧皮质骨丢失相关的合并损伤,将需要联合入路的患者分为三型。分类包括:1 型,游离关节内碎片;2 型,位于腕关节以外的远移背侧碎片;3 型,关节内中央嵌插和背侧移位碎片,不能通过间接方法复位。

结果

7 例 1 型骨折患者采用掌侧钢板和关节内碎片切除治疗。14 例 2 型骨折患者:12 例采用掌侧钢板和背侧碎片切除治疗,2 例背侧有较大不稳定碎片采用掌侧和背侧联合钢板治疗。其余 11 例 3 型骨折患者采用掌侧和背侧联合钢板治疗。末次随访时,X 线片显示平均桡骨倾斜 16.9°,掌倾角平均 4.2°,桡骨高度平均 7.5mm。根据 Garland 和 Werley 评分,3 例功能结果为优,25 例为良,4 例为可。

结论

该分类系统表明在不稳定的 DRF 中何时需要附加背侧入路,可为合理的手术决策提供有用的指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/513e/8609214/62f66270d304/cios-13-529-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验