Wiedl Andreas, Förch Stefan, Otto Alexander, Lisitano Leonard, Rau Kim, Nachbaur Thilo, Mayr Edgar
Abteilung für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie, Plastische und Handchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2021 Nov 30;12:21514593211058969. doi: 10.1177/21514593211058969. eCollection 2021.
Hip fractures are well researched in orthogeriatric literature. Equivalent investigations for fragility-associated periprosthetic and periosteosynthetic femoral, ankle joint, pelvic ring, and rib fractures are still rare.The purpose of this study was to evaluate mortality, functional outcome, and socioeconomic parameters associated to the upper-mentioned fragility fractures prospectively in a 2-year follow-up.
Over the course of a year, all periprosthetic and periosteosynthetic femoral fractures (PPFF), ankle joint fractures (AJ), pelvic ring fractures (PR), and rib fractures (RF), that were treated on a co-managed orthogeriatric ward, were assessed. Parker Mobility Score (PMS), Barthel Index (BI), place of residence, and care level were recorded. After 2 years, patients and/or relatives were contacted by mailed questionnaires or phone calls in order to calculate mortality and reevaluate the mentioned parameters.
Follow-up rate was 77.7%, assessing 87 patients overall. The relative mortality risk was significantly increased for PR (2.9 (95% CI: 1.5-5.4)) and PPFF (3.5 (95% CI: 1.2-5.8)) but not for RF (1.5 (95% CI: 0.4-2.6)) and AJ (2.0 (95% CI: 0.0-4.0)). Every fracture group except AJ showed significantly higher BI on average at follow-up. PMS was, respectively, reduced on average for PR and RF insignificantly, but significantly for PPFF and AJ in comparison to pre-hospital values. 10.0-27.3% (each group) of patients had to leave their homes permanently; care levels were raised in 30.0-61.5% of cases.
This investigation provides a perspective for further larger examinations. PR and PPFF correlate with significant increased mortality risk. Patients suffering from PPFF, PR, and RF were able to significantly recover in their activities of daily living. AJ and PPFF conclude in significant reduction of PMS after 2 years.
Any fragility fracture has its impact on mortality, function, and socioeconomic aspects and shall not be underestimated. Despite some fractures not being the most common, they are still present in daily practice.
髋部骨折在老年骨科文献中有充分研究。而对于与脆性相关的人工关节周围及骨内固定周围的股骨、踝关节、骨盆环和肋骨骨折的同等研究仍较为罕见。本研究的目的是在为期2年的随访中前瞻性评估上述脆性骨折相关的死亡率、功能结局和社会经济参数。
在一年的时间里,对在老年骨科联合病房接受治疗的所有人工关节周围及骨内固定周围的股骨骨折(PPFF)、踝关节骨折(AJ)、骨盆环骨折(PR)和肋骨骨折(RF)进行评估。记录帕克活动评分(PMS)、巴氏指数(BI)、居住地点和护理级别。2年后,通过邮寄问卷或电话联系患者和/或亲属,以计算死亡率并重新评估上述参数。
随访率为77.7%,共评估了87例患者。PR(2.9(95%CI:1.5 - 5.4))和PPFF(3.5(95%CI:1.2 - 5.8))的相对死亡风险显著增加,但RF(1.5(95%CI:0.4 - 2.6))和AJ(2.0(95%CI:0.0 - 4.0))没有。除AJ外,每个骨折组在随访时平均BI显著更高。与院前值相比,PR和RF的PMS平均分别无显著降低,但PPFF和AJ显著降低。10.0 - 27.3%(每组)的患者不得不永久离开家园;30.0 - 61.5%的病例护理级别提高。
本调查为进一步的大型研究提供了一个视角。PR和PPFF与显著增加的死亡风险相关。患有PPFF、PR和RF的患者在日常生活活动中能够显著恢复。AJ和PPFF在2年后PMS显著降低。
任何脆性骨折都会对死亡率、功能和社会经济方面产生影响,不应被低估。尽管有些骨折并非最常见,但在日常实践中仍然存在。