Suppr超能文献

超分割放化疗的临床研究:一项系统评价。

Clinical Studies on Ultrafractionated Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Scirocco Erica, Cellini Francesco, Zamagni Alice, Macchia Gabriella, Deodato Francesco, Cilla Savino, Strigari Lidia, Buwenge Milly, Rizzo Stefania, Cammelli Silvia, Morganti Alessio Giuseppe

机构信息

Radiation Oncology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 16;11:748200. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.748200. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

AIM

The efficacy of low-dose fractionated radiotherapy (LDFRT) and chemotherapy (CHT) combination has large preclinical but little clinical evidence. Therefore, the aim of this review was to collect and analyze the clinical results of LDRT plus concurrent CHT in patients with advanced cancers.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed using the PRISMA methodology. Only studies based on the combination of LDFRT (< 1 Gy/fraction) and CHT were included. Endpoints of the analysis were tumor response, toxicity, and overall survival, with particular focus on any differences between LDFRT-CHT and CHT alone.

RESULTS

Twelve studies (307 patients) fulfilled the selection criteria and were included in this review. Two studies were retrospective, one was a prospective pilot trial, six were phase II studies, two were phase I trials, and one was a phase I/II open label study. No randomized controlled trials were found. Seven out of eight studies comparing clinical response showed higher rates after LDFRT-CHT compared to CHT alone. Three out of four studies comparing survival reported improved results after combined treatment. Three studies compared toxicity of CHT and LDFRT plus CHT, and all of them reported similar adverse events rates. In most cases, toxicity was manageable with only three likely LDFRT-unrelated fatal events (1%), all recorded in the same series on LDFRT plus temozolomide in glioblastoma multiforme patients.

CONCLUSION

None of the analyzed studies provided level I evidence on the clinical impact of LDFRT plus CHT. However, it should be noted that, apart from two small series of breast cancers, all studies reported improved therapeutic outcomes and similar tolerability compared to CHT alone.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020206639.

摘要

目的

低剂量分割放疗(LDFRT)与化疗(CHT)联合使用的疗效在临床前有大量证据,但临床证据较少。因此,本综述的目的是收集和分析晚期癌症患者接受低剂量放疗联合同步化疗的临床结果。

方法

采用PRISMA方法在PubMed上进行系统的文献检索。仅纳入基于低剂量分割放疗(<1Gy/分次)与化疗联合的研究。分析的终点为肿瘤反应、毒性和总生存期,特别关注低剂量分割放疗联合化疗与单纯化疗之间的差异。

结果

12项研究(307例患者)符合入选标准并纳入本综述。2项研究为回顾性研究,1项为前瞻性试点试验,6项为II期研究,2项为I期试验,1项为I/II期开放标签研究。未发现随机对照试验。在比较临床反应的8项研究中,7项显示低剂量分割放疗联合化疗后的反应率高于单纯化疗。在比较生存情况的4项研究中,3项报告联合治疗后结果有所改善。3项研究比较了化疗与低剂量分割放疗联合化疗的毒性,所有研究均报告不良事件发生率相似。在大多数情况下,毒性是可控的,仅有3例可能与低剂量分割放疗无关的致命事件(1%),均记录在同一组多形性胶质母细胞瘤患者接受低剂量分割放疗联合替莫唑胺的系列研究中。

结论

分析的研究均未提供关于低剂量分割放疗联合化疗临床影响的I级证据。然而,应注意的是,除了两小系列乳腺癌研究外,所有研究均报告与单纯化疗相比,治疗效果有所改善且耐受性相似。

系统综述注册

www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD42020206639。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f74/8635188/f3350ce2d96b/fonc-11-748200-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验