Suppr超能文献

射波刀立体定向放射外科治疗的交付质量保证评估

Assessment of Delivery Quality Assurance for Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Cyberknife.

作者信息

Li Jun, Zhang Xile, Pan Yuxi, Zhuang Hongqing, Wang Junjie, Yang Ruijie

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 17;11:751922. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.751922. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to establish and assess a practical delivery quality assurance method for stereotactic radiosurgery with Cyberknife by analyzing the geometric and dosimetric accuracies obtained using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 films. Moreover, this study also explores the relationship between the parameters of plan complexity, target volume, and deliverability parameters and provides a valuable reference for improving plan optimization and validation.

METHODS

One hundred fifty cases of delivery quality assurance plans were performed on Cyberknife to assess point dose and planar dose distribution, respectively, using a PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and Gafchromic EBT3 films. The measured chamber doses were compared with the planned mean doses in the sensitive volume of the chamber, and the measured planar doses were compared with the calculated dose distribution using gamma index analysis. The gamma passing rates were evaluated using the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The statistical significance of the correlations between the complexity metrics, target volume, and the gamma passing rate were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

For point dose comparison, the averaged dose differences (± standard deviations) were 1.6 ± 0.73% for all the cases. For planar dose distribution, the mean gamma passing rate for 3%/1 mm, and 2%/2 mm evaluation criteria were 94.26% ± 1.89%, and 93.86% ± 2.16%, respectively. The gamma passing rates were higher than 90% for all the delivery quality assurance plans with the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. The difference in point dose was lowly correlated with volume of PTV, number of beams, and treatment time for 150 DQA plans, and highly correlated with volume of PTV for 18 DQA plans of small target. DQA gamma passing rate (2%/2 mm) was a moderate significant correlation for the number of nodes, number of beams and treatment time, and a low correlation with MU.

CONCLUSION

PTW31016 PinPoint ionization chamber and EBT3 film can be used for routine Cyberknife delivery quality assurance. The point dose difference should be within 3%. The gamma passing rate should be higher than 90% for the criteria of 3%/1 mm and 2%/2 mm. In addition, the plan complexity and PTV volume were found to have some influence on the plan deliverability.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是通过分析使用PTW31016 PinPoint电离室和EBT3薄膜获得的几何和剂量准确性,建立并评估一种适用于射波刀立体定向放射治疗的实际交付质量保证方法。此外,本研究还探讨了计划复杂性、靶区体积和可交付性参数之间的关系,为改进计划优化和验证提供有价值的参考。

方法

在射波刀上执行150例交付质量保证计划,分别使用PTW31016 PinPoint电离室和Gafchromic EBT3薄膜评估点剂量和平面剂量分布。将测量的电离室剂量与电离室敏感体积内的计划平均剂量进行比较,使用伽马指数分析将测量的平面剂量与计算的剂量分布进行比较。使用3%/1 mm和2%/2 mm的标准评估伽马通过率。使用Spearman等级相关系数分析复杂性指标、靶区体积和伽马通过率之间相关性的统计显著性。

结果

对于点剂量比较,所有病例的平均剂量差异(±标准差)为1.6±0.73%。对于平面剂量分布,3%/1 mm和2%/2 mm评估标准的平均伽马通过率分别为94.26%±1.89%和93.86%±2.16%。对于所有交付质量保证计划,采用3%/1 mm和2%/2 mm标准时,伽马通过率均高于90%。对于150个剂量质量保证计划,点剂量差异与计划靶体积、射野数和治疗时间呈低度相关,对于18个小靶区剂量质量保证计划,点剂量差异与计划靶体积呈高度相关。剂量质量保证伽马通过率(2%/2 mm)与节点数、射野数和治疗时间呈中度显著相关,与监测单位呈低度相关。

结论

PTW31016 PinPoint电离室和EBT3薄膜可用于射波刀常规交付质量保证。点剂量差异应在3%以内。采用3%/1 mm和2%/2 mm标准时,伽马通过率应高于90%。此外,发现计划复杂性和计划靶体积对计划可交付性有一定影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4f7/8635503/d1b02c198a0b/fonc-11-751922-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验