Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死合并贫血患者的限制性与宽松性红细胞输血策略:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Restrictive vs. Liberal Red Blood Cell Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Yeshen, Xu Zhengrong, Huang Yuming, Ye Qirao, Xie Nianjin, Zeng Lihuan, Lian Xingji, Dai Yining, Chen Jiyan, He Pengcheng, Tan Ning, Liu Yuanhui

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Coronary Heart Disease Prevention, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Cardiology, People's Hospital of Baoan Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 16;8:736163. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.736163. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Anemia is frequent in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the optimal red blood cell transfusion strategy for AMI patients with anemia is still controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy of restrictive and liberal red cell transfusion strategies in AMI patients with anemia. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov, from their inception until March 2021. Studies designed to compare the efficacy between restrictive and liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies in patients with AMI were included. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, including overall mortality, in-hospital or follow-up mortality. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were presented and pooled by random-effects models. The search yielded a total of 6,630 participants in six studies. A total of 2,008 patients received restrictive red blood cell transfusion while 4,622 patients were given liberal red blood cell transfusion. No difference was found in overall mortality and follow-up mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion groups (RR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.82-1.40, = 0.62; RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.56-1.42, = 0.62). However, restrictive transfusion tended to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with liberal transfusion (RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.00-1.50, = 0.05). No secondary outcomes, including follow-up reinfarction, stroke, and acute heart failure, differed significantly between the two groups. In addition, subgroup analysis showed no differences in overall mortality between the two groups based on sample size and design. Restrictive and liberal red blood cell transfusion have a similar effect on overall mortality and follow-up mortality in AMI patients with anemia. However, restrictive transfusion tended to have a higher risk of in-hospital mortality compared with liberal transfusion. The findings suggest that transfusion strategy should be further evaluated in future studies.

摘要

贫血在急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中很常见,对于合并贫血的AMI患者,最佳的红细胞输注策略仍存在争议。我们旨在比较限制性和宽松性红细胞输注策略对合并贫血的AMI患者的疗效。我们系统检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和Clinicaltrials.gov,检索时间从各数据库建库至2021年3月。纳入旨在比较限制性和宽松性红细胞输注策略对AMI患者疗效的研究。主要结局为全因死亡率,包括总体死亡率、住院死亡率或随访死亡率。呈现风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间(CI),并采用随机效应模型进行汇总。检索共纳入六项研究中的6630名参与者。共有2008例患者接受限制性红细胞输注,4622例患者接受宽松性红细胞输注。限制性和宽松性输血组在总体死亡率和随访死亡率方面未发现差异(RR = 1.07,95%CI = 0.82 - 1.40,P = 0.62;RR = 0.89,95%CI = 0.56 - 1.42,P = 0.62)。然而,与宽松性输血相比,限制性输血的住院死亡率风险更高(RR = 1.22,95%CI = 1.00 - 1.50,P = 0.05)。两组在包括随访期再梗死、中风和急性心力衰竭在内的次要结局方面无显著差异。此外,亚组分析显示,基于样本量和设计,两组在总体死亡率方面无差异。对于合并贫血的AMI患者,限制性和宽松性红细胞输注在总体死亡率和随访死亡率方面具有相似的效果。然而,与宽松性输血相比,限制性输血的住院死亡率风险更高。研究结果表明,输血策略应在未来研究中进一步评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e5/8636896/717a5643ebf5/fcvm-08-736163-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验