Department of Periodontology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
J Periodontol. 2022 Oct;93(10):1500-1509. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0351. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether clinical attachment level gain (ΔCAL) in deep untreated periodontal lesions may be improved by a two-stage, subgingival instrumentation scheme involving air polishing.
This 6-month, randomized, controlled, examiner-masked clinical trial was performed in 44 patients with periodontitis with untreated periodontal lesions ≥6 mm. At baseline, day 28, 84, and 168 CAL, probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque control record (PlaCR) were recorded. After baseline examination control group patients received full-mouth sub- and supragingival instrumentation using scalers and curets. In the test group initial subgingival cleaning was limited to the removal of soft bacterial deposits by air polishing. Subgingival scaling and root planing was performed only after the first re-evaluation at day 28.
In deep lesions ≥6 mm a significant reduction of mean CAL scores was observed at day 28 and at day 168 for both experimental groups. Differences between the groups however did not reach the level of significance. Mean PD was also significantly reduced at day 28 and at 168 in both experimental groups, with no significant differences between the groups. Mean BOP scores did not change significantly in both groups during the 168-day observation period. Only in the test group mean PlaCR scores were significantly reduced at day 168 compared with baseline.
Subgingival instrumentation of untreated PD ≥6 mm by air polishing alone results in a significant short-term gain of CAL comparable to conventional scaling and root planing. Its sequential two-step combination with scaling and root planing, however, does not additionally enhance long-term gain of CAL.
本研究旨在评估在未治疗的牙周深袋病变中,通过两阶段、龈下器械处理方案(包括空气抛光)是否可以改善临床附着水平的获得(ΔCAL)。
这是一项为期 6 个月、随机、对照、 examiner-masked 的临床试验,纳入了 44 名患有牙周炎且未治疗的牙周病变≥6mm 的患者。在基线、第 28、84 和 168 天,记录探诊深度(PD)、探诊出血(BOP)和菌斑控制记录(PlaCR)。基线检查后,对照组患者接受了使用龈下刮治器和根面锉的全口龈下和龈上器械处理。在试验组,初始龈下清洁仅限于通过空气抛光去除软细菌沉积物。只有在第 28 天的第一次重新评估后,才进行龈下刮治和根面平整。
在深度≥6mm 的病变中,两组在第 28 天和第 168 天的平均 CAL 评分均显著降低。然而,两组之间的差异并未达到显著性水平。两组的平均 PD 也在第 28 天和第 168 天显著降低,两组之间无显著差异。在 168 天的观察期间,两组的平均 BOP 评分均无显著变化。只有试验组在第 168 天的平均 PlaCR 评分与基线相比显著降低。
单独使用空气抛光对未经治疗的 PD≥6mm 进行龈下器械处理可在短期内获得与传统龈下刮治和根面平整相当的 CAL 显著增加。然而,与龈下刮治和根面平整的顺序两步联合使用并不能额外增加 CAL 的长期获得。