Griswold D M, Albright J A, Schiffman E, Johnson R, Southwick W
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Apr;60(3):285-92.
The problem of how best to treat a patient with instability of the atlanto-axial complex is still somewhat controversial. In this follow-up study of fifty-nine patients, nineteen were treated by a plaster jacket and brace; eleven, by single midline wiring and onlay bone grafts; and thirty, by four circumferential wires around the posterior elements of the axis and atlas with two bone grafts wedged between these elements on each side according to the method described by Brooks and Jenkins. (One patient had both types of fusion.) Although direct comparison of the results of treatment in three groups was not possible because of the many variables that may have influenced the results, the incidence of solid fusion was distinctly higher after the Brooks fusions despite less postoperative immobilization.
如何最佳治疗寰枢复合体不稳定的患者这一问题仍存在一定争议。在这项对59例患者的随访研究中,19例采用石膏背心和支具治疗;11例采用单一中线钢丝固定及贴附植骨;30例根据布鲁克斯和詹金斯描述的方法,在枢椎和寰椎后部结构周围用四根环形钢丝固定,并在两侧这些结构之间楔入两块植骨。(1例患者接受了两种融合方式。)尽管由于许多可能影响结果的变量,无法对三组治疗结果进行直接比较,但布鲁克斯融合术后坚固融合的发生率明显更高,尽管术后固定时间较短。