Suppr超能文献

利益相关者对将无行动性载脂蛋白 L1(APOL1)遗传结果返还给非裔美国研究参与者的看法。

Stakeholder Perspectives on Returning Nonactionable Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Genetic Results to African American Research Participants.

机构信息

7284University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

12328Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):4-14. doi: 10.1177/15562646211063267. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

Abstract

The ethics of returning nonactionable genetic research results to individuals are unclear. Apolipoprotein L1 () genetic variants are nonactionable, predominantly found in people of West African ancestry, and contribute to kidney disease disparities. To inform ethical research practice, we interviewed researchers, clinicians, and African American community members (  =  76) about the potential risks and benefits of returning research results. Stakeholders strongly supported returning results. Benefits include reciprocity for participants, community education and rebuilding trust in research, and expectation of future actionability. Risks include analytic validity, misunderstanding, psychological burdens, stigma and discrimination, and questionable resource tradeoffs. results should be offered to participants. Responsibly fulfilling this offer requires careful identification of best communication practices, broader education about the topic, and ongoing community engagement.

摘要

将无行动意义的基因研究结果返还给个人的伦理问题尚不清楚。载脂蛋白 L1() 基因变异无行动意义,主要存在于西非血统的人群中,且与肾脏疾病的差异有关。为了为伦理研究实践提供信息,我们采访了研究人员、临床医生和非裔美国社区成员(  =  76),了解返还研究结果的潜在风险和益处。利益相关者强烈支持返还结果。益处包括参与者的互惠、社区教育和重建对研究的信任,以及对未来行动意义的期望。风险包括分析有效性、误解、心理负担、污名化和歧视,以及有疑问的资源权衡。应该向参与者提供结果。负责任地兑现这一承诺需要仔细确定最佳沟通实践,更广泛地了解这一主题,并持续进行社区参与。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder Perspectives on Returning Nonactionable Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) Genetic Results to African American Research Participants.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):4-14. doi: 10.1177/15562646211063267. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Apolipoprotein L1 Testing in African Americans: Involving the Community in Policy Discussions.
Am J Nephrol. 2019;50(4):303-311. doi: 10.1159/000502675. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
3
African American Living Donors' Attitudes About APOL1 Genetic Testing: A Mixed Methods Study.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Dec;72(6):819-833. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
A National Survey of Transplant Surgeons and Nephrologists on Implementing () Genetic Testing Into Clinical Practice.
Prog Transplant. 2019 Mar;29(1):26-35. doi: 10.1177/1526924818817048. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
6
Clinical Genetic Testing for APOL1: Are we There Yet?
Semin Nephrol. 2017 Nov;37(6):552-557. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.07.009.
7
Evaluating ApoL1 Genetic Testing Policy Options for Transplant Centers: A Delphi Consensus Panel Project with Stakeholders.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):494-502. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000397. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
9
Practical Considerations for APOL1 Genotyping in the Living Kidney Donor Evaluation.
Transplantation. 2020 Jan;104(1):27-32. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002933.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic Testing in Patients With Recent African Ancestry and Hypertension: A Pilot Study of Attitudes and Perceptions.
Kidney Med. 2022 Sep 29;4(12):100549. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100549. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Race, Ancestry, and Genetic Risk for Kidney Failure.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 Dec;80(6):801-804. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

3
At the Research-Clinical Interface: Returning Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):1181-1189. doi: 10.2215/CJN.09670819. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Preferences for Return of Genetic Results Among Participants in the Jackson Heart Study and Framingham Heart Study.
Circ Genom Precis Med. 2019 Dec;12(12):e002632. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002632. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
6
Apolipoprotein L1 Testing in African Americans: Involving the Community in Policy Discussions.
Am J Nephrol. 2019;50(4):303-311. doi: 10.1159/000502675. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Research participants' preferences for receiving genetic risk information: a discrete choice experiment.
Genet Med. 2019 Oct;21(10):2381-2389. doi: 10.1038/s41436-019-0511-4. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
8
You Are Just Now Telling Us About This? African American Perspectives of Testing for Genetic Susceptibility to Kidney Disease.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Apr;30(4):526-530. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018111091. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
9
African American Living Donors' Attitudes About APOL1 Genetic Testing: A Mixed Methods Study.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Dec;72(6):819-833. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Return of results and data to study participants.
Science. 2018 Oct 12;362(6411):159-160. doi: 10.1126/science.aav0005.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验