Suppr超能文献

女同性恋身份是否已经过时?

Is lesbian identity obsolete?

机构信息

California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Lesbian Stud. 2022;26(1):1-11. doi: 10.1080/10894160.2021.2005231. Epub 2021 Dec 6.

Abstract

In this special issue we asked the question "Is lesbian identity obsolete?" We posed this provocation in order to think through what has changed about lesbian identities and their articulations in the face of recent developments-from the rise of transphobia in the name of feminism to increased income inequality and gentrification and the accompanying loss of community spaces. The special issue turned into a triple issue receiving a large number of submissions from across the world. A synthesis of the articles suggests several threads. First, lesbian identity remains important to many women across the world. Whereas some academic writing and communities in the United States have shifted toward queerness, this move is resisted among many lesbians, especially in communities outside of the U.S. Women who sustain lesbian identity must confront attacks that morph and change across time and space. Some lesbians are marginalized because they are seen as psychologically deviant, whereas others are framed as criminals; a more recent form of marginalization equates lesbianism with transphobia. To face these attacks, lesbian intellectual traditions offer an understanding of lesbian identity as political, nonessentialist, intersectional, and community grounded. The rejection of the "born this way narrative" of lesbian identity allows lesbianism to be inclusive of different configurations of gender identities including trans, nonbinary, and cis women as well as sexual orientations including bisexuality, demisexuality, and asexuality. An understanding of lesbianism as grounded in politics of inclusion and solidarity sustains the power of the lesbian movement to fight the rise of neo-fascism and the devastation of climate change.

摘要

在本期特刊中,我们提出了一个问题:“女同性恋身份是否已经过时?”我们提出这个挑衅性的问题,是为了思考在最近的发展中,女同性恋身份及其表达方式发生了哪些变化——从女权主义名义下的跨性别恐惧症的兴起,到收入不平等、中产阶级化以及随之而来的社区空间丧失。本期特刊变成了三期特刊,收到了来自世界各地的大量投稿。对这些文章的综合分析表明了几个线索。首先,女同性恋身份对世界各地的许多女性仍然很重要。尽管在美国,一些学术著作和社群已经转向酷儿理论,但这种转变在许多女同性恋者中遭到抵制,尤其是在美国以外的社群中。维持女同性恋身份的女性必须面对随着时间和空间的变化而不断变化和演变的攻击。一些女同性恋者被边缘化,因为她们被视为心理变态,而另一些女同性恋者则被视为罪犯;最近出现的边缘化形式将女同性恋等同于跨性别恐惧症。为了应对这些攻击,女同性恋知识分子传统提供了一种将女同性恋身份理解为政治的、非本质主义的、交叉的和以社区为基础的观点。拒绝女同性恋身份的“天生如此的叙述”,使得女同性恋身份能够包容不同的性别认同配置,包括跨性别者、非二元性别者和顺性别女性,以及包括双性恋、半性恋和无性恋在内的性取向。将女同性恋理解为基于包容和平等的政治,维持了女同性恋运动的力量,使其能够对抗新法西斯主义的兴起和气候变化的破坏。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验