• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

样本采集顺序对感染性角膜炎宏基因组深度测序诊断性能的影响。

Impact of Sample Collection Order on the Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Deep Sequencing for Infectious Keratitis.

机构信息

Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, CA.

Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, OR; and.

出版信息

Cornea. 2022 Jan 1;41(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002766.

DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002766
PMID:34870622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8649208/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article was to evaluate the impact of sample collection order on the diagnostic yield of metagenomic deep sequencing (MDS) for determining the causative pathogen in infectious keratitis.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional diagnostic test evaluation among subjects with infectious keratitis at Aravind Eye Hospital in Madurai, India. All subjects underwent corneal scrapings of the affected eye to obtain potassium hydroxide smear, Gram stain, bacterial culture, and fungal culture, in this order. The order of MDS specimen collection relative to smear and culture samples was randomized and served as the primary predictor. Outcomes included the normalized copy number of pathogenic RNA detected by MDS, the proportion of MDS samples that were diagnostic, and the agreement of MDS results with cultures.

RESULTS

MDS samples from 46 subjects with corneal ulcers were evaluated. MDS was positive in 33 subjects (76%) and had 74% overall agreement with culture results. There was no association between order of MDS sample collection and normalized copy number of genetic material detected (P = 0.62) or the likelihood of MDS positivity (P = 0.46). However, the likelihood of agreement between MDS and cultures decreased when MDS corneal swabs were collected after other diagnostic corneal scrapings (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall yield of MDS for detecting the cause of infectious keratitis was not affected by sample collection order. However, diagnostic agreement between MDS and cultures decreased when MDS samples were collected after other specimens. Additional investigation is warranted to determine whether this represents increased sensitivity of MDS compared with cultures or higher susceptibility to contaminants.

摘要

目的

本文旨在评估样本采集顺序对宏基因组深度测序(MDS)确定感染性角膜炎病原体的诊断效果的影响。

方法

我们在印度马杜赖的 Aravind 眼科医院进行了一项横断面诊断测试评估,纳入了感染性角膜炎患者。所有患者均接受了受影响眼睛的角膜刮片,以获得氢氧化钾涂片、革兰氏染色、细菌培养和真菌培养,顺序如下。MDS 标本采集相对于涂片和培养样本的顺序是随机的,作为主要预测因子。结果包括通过 MDS 检测到的致病性 RNA 的标准化拷贝数、MDS 样本的诊断比例以及 MDS 结果与培养结果的一致性。

结果

评估了 46 例角膜溃疡患者的 MDS 样本。33 例(76%)MDS 阳性,与培养结果总体一致率为 74%。MDS 样本采集顺序与检测到的遗传物质的标准化拷贝数之间(P=0.62)或 MDS 阳性的可能性(P=0.46)均无关联。然而,当 MDS 角膜拭子在其他诊断性角膜刮片后采集时,MDS 与培养之间的一致性可能性降低(P=0.05)。

结论

MDS 检测感染性角膜炎病因的总体效果不受样本采集顺序的影响。然而,当 MDS 样本在其他样本后采集时,MDS 与培养之间的诊断一致性降低。需要进一步研究以确定这是否代表 MDS 与培养相比具有更高的敏感性,还是更容易受到污染物的影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of Sample Collection Order on the Diagnostic Performance of Metagenomic Deep Sequencing for Infectious Keratitis.样本采集顺序对感染性角膜炎宏基因组深度测序诊断性能的影响。
Cornea. 2022 Jan 1;41(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002766.
2
Clinical and microbiological study of paediatric infectious keratitis in South India: a 3-year study (2011-2013).印度南部小儿感染性角膜炎的临床与微生物学研究:一项为期3年的研究(2011 - 2013年)
Br J Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;100(12):1719-1723. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307631. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
3
Rapid Point-of-Care Identification of Aspergillus Species in Microbial Keratitis.微生物角膜炎中曲霉菌种的即时现场快速检测。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 1;141(10):966-973. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.4214.
4
Corneal biopsy for diagnosis of recalcitrant microbial keratitis.用于诊断难治性微生物性角膜炎的角膜活检。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1527-1533. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3981-1. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
[A single-center study on the distribution and shifting trend of infectious keratitis pathogens from 2018 to 2022].[一项关于2018年至2022年感染性角膜炎病原体分布及变化趋势的单中心研究]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2024 Oct 11;60(10):832-837. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20231018-00152.
6
Evaluation of corneal scraping smear examination methods in the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a survey of eight years of laboratory experience.角膜刮片涂片检查方法在细菌性和真菌性角膜炎诊断中的评估:八年实验室经验调查
Cornea. 2002 Oct;21(7):643-7. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200210000-00002.
7
Polymerase chain reaction-guided diagnosis of infective keratitis - a hospital-based study.聚合酶链反应引导的感染性角膜炎诊断——一项基于医院的研究。
Curr Eye Res. 2012 Nov;37(11):1005-11. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2012.698357. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
8
Epidemiological and microbiological profile of infective keratitis in Ahmedabad.艾哈迈达巴德地区感染性角膜炎的流行病学和微生物学特征。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jul;60(4):267-72. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.98702.
9
A comparison of antimicrobial regimen outcomes and antibiogram development in microbial keratitis: a prospective cohort study in Alexandria, Egypt.埃及亚历山大微生物角膜炎的抗生素方案结果和药敏谱发展比较:前瞻性队列研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Jun;262(6):1865-1882. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06362-0. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
The corneal ulcer one-touch study: a simplified microbiological specimen collection method.角膜溃疡一键式研究:一种简化的微生物标本采集方法。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jan;159(1):37-43.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
The application of high-throughput sequencing technology in corneal diseases.高通量测序技术在角膜疾病中的应用。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 10;44(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03049-1.
2
Metagenomic sequencing for investigation of a national keratoconjunctivitis outbreak, Israel, 2022.基于宏基因组测序的 2022 年以色列全国性角膜结膜炎暴发调查
Euro Surveill. 2023 Aug;28(31). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.31.2300010.
3
Diagnostic armamentarium of infectious keratitis: A comprehensive review.感染性角膜炎的诊断方法学:全面综述。
Ocul Surf. 2022 Jan;23:27-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 13.