• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性冠状动脉综合征的双重抗栓治疗:欧洲心脏病学会标准与CHADS-P2A2RC评分比较

Dual antithrombotic treatment in chronic coronary syndrome: European Society of Cardiology criteria vs. CHADS-P2A2RC score.

作者信息

Würtz Morten, Olesen Kevin Kris Warnakula, Mortensen Martin Bødtker, Eikelboom John W, Mohammad Moman Aladdin, Erlinge David, Kristensen Steen Dalby, Maeng Michael

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus 8200, Denmark.

Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences 237 Barton Street East Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2, Canada, and McMaster University, 1280 Main St W, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 7;43(10):996-1004. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab785.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab785
PMID:34871376
Abstract

AIMS

According to the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), adding a P2Y12 inhibitor or rivaroxaban to aspirin should be considered in high-risk patients. We estimated the proportion of patients eligible for treatment with the ESC criteria and examined if a recently validated risk score (CHADS-P2A2RC) could improve risk prediction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 61 338 CCS patients undergoing first-time coronary angiography in Western Denmark (2003-16) and classified them according to the ESC criteria and the CHADS-P2A2RC score. The ESC criteria identified 33.9% as high risk, 53.3% as moderate risk, and 12.8% as low risk. The CHADS-P2A2RC score identified 24.9% as high risk (≥4 points), 48.1% as moderate risk (2-3 points), and 27.0% as low risk (≤1 points). Major adverse cardiovascular events per 100 person-years were 4.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.6-5.0] in patients considered high risk with both schemes, 2.1 (95% CI 2.0-2.2) in patients considered high risk with the ESC but low-to-moderate risk with the CHADS-P2A2RC criteria, 3.8 (95% CI 3.6-4.1) in patients considered low-to-moderate risk with the ESC but high risk with the CHADS-P2A2RC criteria, and 1.5 (95% CI 1.5-1.6) in patients considered low-to-moderate risk with both schemes. The CHADS-P2A2RC score enabled correct downward risk reclassification of 5161 patients (8%) without events, yielding an improved specificity of 9.7%, a loss of sensitivity of 4.4%, and an overall net reclassification index of 0.053.

CONCLUSION

Based on the 2019 ESC guidelines, dual antithrombotic treatment should be considered in one-third of CCS patients. The CHADS-P2A2RC score improved risk classification and may particularly identify low-risk patients with limited benefit from treatment.

摘要

目的

根据2019年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)慢性冠状动脉综合征(CCS)指南,对于高危患者,应考虑在阿司匹林基础上加用P2Y12抑制剂或利伐沙班。我们估算了符合ESC标准进行治疗的患者比例,并检验了最近验证的风险评分(CHADS-P2A2RC)是否能改善风险预测。

方法和结果

我们纳入了丹麦西部61338例首次接受冠状动脉造影的CCS患者(2003年至2016年),并根据ESC标准和CHADS-P2A2RC评分对他们进行分类。ESC标准将33.9%的患者归为高危,53.3%为中危,12.8%为低危。CHADS-P2A2RC评分将24.9%的患者归为高危(≥4分),48.1%为中危(2 - 3分),27.0%为低危(≤1分)。两种方案均判定为高危的患者每100人年的主要不良心血管事件发生率为4.8[95%置信区间(CI)4.6 - 5.0],ESC判定为高危但CHADS-P2A2RC标准判定为低至中危的患者为2.1(95%CI 2.0 - 2.2),ESC判定为低至中危但CHADS-P2A2RC标准判定为高危的患者为3.8(95%CI 3.6 - 4.1),两种方案均判定为低至中危的患者为1.5(95%CI 1.5 - 1.6)。CHADS-P2A2RC评分使5161例(8%)无事件发生的患者风险得到正确下调重新分类,特异性提高了9.7%,敏感性降低了4.4%,总体净重新分类指数为0.053。

结论

基于2019年ESC指南,三分之一的CCS患者应考虑双联抗栓治疗。CHADS-P2A2RC评分改善了风险分类,尤其可能识别出从治疗中获益有限的低危患者。

相似文献

1
Dual antithrombotic treatment in chronic coronary syndrome: European Society of Cardiology criteria vs. CHADS-P2A2RC score.慢性冠状动脉综合征的双重抗栓治疗:欧洲心脏病学会标准与CHADS-P2A2RC评分比较
Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 7;43(10):996-1004. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab785.
2
Net clinical benefit of extended dual pathway inhibition according to baseline risk in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a COMPASS substudy.慢性冠状动脉综合征患者根据基线风险的扩展双重途径抑制的净临床获益:COMPASS 亚研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 May 4;10(3):201-209. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae017.
3
The Association of CHADS-P2A2RC Risk Score With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Taking P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After 3 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受3个月双重抗血小板治疗的患者,采用P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗3个月时CHADS-P2A2RC风险评分与临床结局的相关性
Korean Circ J. 2024 Apr;54(4):189-200. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0268.
4
CAC Score Improves Coronary and CV Risk Assessment Above Statin Indication by ESC and AHA/ACC Primary Prevention Guidelines.CAC 评分提高了 ESC 和 AHA/ACC 一级预防指南中他汀类药物适应证的冠状动脉和心血管风险评估。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):143-153. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Clinically significant bleeding with low-dose rivaroxaban versus aspirin, in addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in acute coronary syndromes (GEMINI-ACS-1): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial.在急性冠脉综合征(GEMINI-ACS-1)中,与低剂量利伐沙班加 P2Y12 抑制相比,加用阿司匹林导致临床显著出血:一项双盲、多中心、随机试验。
Lancet. 2017 May 6;389(10081):1799-1808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30751-1. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
6
The effect and safety of the antithrombotic therapies in patients with atrial fibrillation and CHADS score 1.房颤伴 CHADS 评分 1 分患者的抗栓治疗效果和安全性。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 May;21(5):501-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01661.x. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
7
Efficacy and Safety of Long-Term Antithrombotic Strategies in Patients With Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.长期抗血栓策略在慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e019184. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019184. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
8
Statin Use in Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease According to 5 Major Guidelines for Sensitivity, Specificity, and Number Needed to Treat.根据 5 大敏感性、特异性和需要治疗的人数指南,他汀类药物在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病一级预防中的应用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Nov 1;4(11):1131-1138. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.3665.
9
External applicability of the COMPASS trial: the Western Denmark Heart Registry.COMPASS 试验的外部适用性:丹麦西部心脏注册研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2019 Oct 1;5(4):192-199. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz013.
10
Atrial fibrillation in outpatients with stable coronary artery disease: results from the multicenter RECENT study.稳定型冠状动脉疾病门诊患者的心房颤动:多中心近期研究结果
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2015;125(3):162-71. doi: 10.20452/pamw.2709. Epub 2015 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Association of CHADS-P2A2RC Risk Score With Clinical Outcomes in Patients Taking P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy After 3 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后接受3个月双重抗血小板治疗的患者,采用P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗3个月时CHADS-P2A2RC风险评分与临床结局的相关性
Korean Circ J. 2024 Apr;54(4):189-200. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0268.
2
Performance of DAPT Score and ESC Criteria for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)评分及欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)标准对中国急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床结局的预测效能
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Jul 5;16:2867-2876. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S415828. eCollection 2023.