Western New England University, Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, Springfield, MA, 01119-2684, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2022 Apr;100:103642. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103642. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
Eye tracking has been applied to train novice drivers and clinicians; however, such applications in aviation are limited. This study develops a gaze-based intervention using video-based, expert commentary, and 3M (Mistake, Mitigation, Mastery) training to instruct visual flight rule student pilots on an instrument cross-check to mitigate the risk of losing aircraft control when they inadvertently enter instrument meteorological conditions (IMC). Twenty general aviation student pilots were randomized into control and experimental groups. Dwell time, return time, entropy, Kullback-Leibler divergence, and deviations from flight paths were compared before and after training to straight-and-level-flight (LF) and standard left level turn (LT) scenarios. After the training, the experimental pilots significantly increased dwell time on primary instruments (PIs), reduced randomness in visual search, and fixated on the PIs in shorter times (in the scenario of LT). In terms of piloting, all experimental pilots successfully kept the aircraft control while five control pilots lost control in IMC; significant differences in altitude and rate of climb deviations were observed between groups (in the scenario of LF).
眼动追踪已被应用于培训新手驾驶员和临床医生;然而,在航空领域的此类应用有限。本研究开发了一种基于注视的干预措施,使用基于视频的、专家评论和 3M(错误、缓解、精通)培训,指导目视飞行规则学生飞行员进行仪表交叉检查,以减轻当他们无意中进入仪表气象条件 (IMC) 时失去飞机控制的风险。20 名通用航空学生飞行员被随机分配到对照组和实验组。在培训前后比较了直飞和平飞 (LF) 和标准左水平转弯 (LT) 场景下的停留时间、返回时间、熵、Kullback-Leibler 散度和偏离飞行路径。经过培训,实验组飞行员在主要仪表 (PI) 上的停留时间明显增加,视觉搜索的随机性降低,并且在更短的时间内注视 PI(在 LT 场景下)。在飞行方面,所有实验组飞行员在 IMC 中都成功地保持了飞机的控制,而对照组中有五名飞行员失去了控制;在 LF 场景下,观察到组间高度和爬升率偏差的显著差异。