Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania.
Centre for Medical Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Dec 6;106(3):846-849. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0496.
Highly sensitive molecular techniques for the detection of low-level Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia are highly useful for various clinical and epidemiological studies. However, differences in how blood samples are preserved, the quantity of blood stored, as well as genomic DNA extraction methods used may compromise the potential usefulness of these methodologies. This study compared diagnostic sensitivity based on microscopy and malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs), with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) P. falciparum positivity of dried blood spots (DBS) or whole blood pellets (WBP) from pregnant women using different DNA extraction protocols (Chelex-saponin or a commercial kit). Samples from 129 pregnant women were analyzed, of which 13 were P. falciparum positive by mRDT and 5 by microscopy. By using extraction kit on WBP and on DBS, qPCR positivity was 27 (20.9%) and 16 (12.4%), respectively, whereas Chelex extraction on DBS only resulted in 4 (3.1%) P. falciparum positive samples. Thus, extraction using commercial kits greatly improve the likelihood of detecting P. falciparum infections.
高灵敏度的分子技术可用于检测低水平疟原虫血症,对于各种临床和流行病学研究非常有用。然而,血液样本的保存方式、储存的血量以及所使用的基因组 DNA 提取方法的差异,可能会影响这些方法的潜在用途。本研究比较了不同 DNA 提取方案(Chelex-皂苷或商用试剂盒)下,孕妇干血斑(DBS)或全血沉淀(WBP)中基于显微镜和疟疾快速诊断检测(mRDT)的诊断敏感性与实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)疟原虫阳性结果。对 129 名孕妇的样本进行了分析,其中 13 名 mRDT 阳性,5 名显微镜阳性。使用试剂盒提取 WBP 和 DBS 中的 DNA 后,qPCR 阳性率分别为 27(20.9%)和 16(12.4%),而 DBS 中使用 Chelex 提取仅得到 4(3.1%)个疟原虫阳性样本。因此,商用试剂盒的提取方法大大提高了检测疟原虫感染的可能性。