Suppr超能文献

基于超敏 qPCR 的孕妇血样中恶性疟原虫的检测:不同 DNA 提取方法处理干血斑或全血样。

Ultrasensitive qPCR-Based Detection of Plasmodium falciparum in Pregnant Women Using Dried Blood or Whole Blood Pellet Samples Processed through Different DNA Extraction Methods.

机构信息

Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Moshi, Tanzania.

Centre for Medical Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet), Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Dec 6;106(3):846-849. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0496.

Abstract

Highly sensitive molecular techniques for the detection of low-level Plasmodium falciparum parasitemia are highly useful for various clinical and epidemiological studies. However, differences in how blood samples are preserved, the quantity of blood stored, as well as genomic DNA extraction methods used may compromise the potential usefulness of these methodologies. This study compared diagnostic sensitivity based on microscopy and malaria rapid diagnostic tests (mRDTs), with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) P. falciparum positivity of dried blood spots (DBS) or whole blood pellets (WBP) from pregnant women using different DNA extraction protocols (Chelex-saponin or a commercial kit). Samples from 129 pregnant women were analyzed, of which 13 were P. falciparum positive by mRDT and 5 by microscopy. By using extraction kit on WBP and on DBS, qPCR positivity was 27 (20.9%) and 16 (12.4%), respectively, whereas Chelex extraction on DBS only resulted in 4 (3.1%) P. falciparum positive samples. Thus, extraction using commercial kits greatly improve the likelihood of detecting P. falciparum infections.

摘要

高灵敏度的分子技术可用于检测低水平疟原虫血症,对于各种临床和流行病学研究非常有用。然而,血液样本的保存方式、储存的血量以及所使用的基因组 DNA 提取方法的差异,可能会影响这些方法的潜在用途。本研究比较了不同 DNA 提取方案(Chelex-皂苷或商用试剂盒)下,孕妇干血斑(DBS)或全血沉淀(WBP)中基于显微镜和疟疾快速诊断检测(mRDT)的诊断敏感性与实时聚合酶链反应(qPCR)疟原虫阳性结果。对 129 名孕妇的样本进行了分析,其中 13 名 mRDT 阳性,5 名显微镜阳性。使用试剂盒提取 WBP 和 DBS 中的 DNA 后,qPCR 阳性率分别为 27(20.9%)和 16(12.4%),而 DBS 中使用 Chelex 提取仅得到 4(3.1%)个疟原虫阳性样本。因此,商用试剂盒的提取方法大大提高了检测疟原虫感染的可能性。

相似文献

8
The Effect of Storage and Extraction Methods on Amplification of Plasmodium falciparum DNA from Dried Blood Spots.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 May;92(5):922-5. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0602. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization of Chelex 100 resin-based extraction of genomic DNA from dried blood spots.
Biol Methods Protoc. 2020 May 2;5(1):bpaa009. doi: 10.1093/biomethods/bpaa009. eCollection 2020.
2
A focus on improving molecular diagnostic approaches to malaria control and elimination in low transmission settings: Review.
Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2019 Apr 25;6:e00107. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00107. eCollection 2019 Aug.
4
Comparison of the Accuracy of Four Malaria Diagnostic Methods in a High Transmission Setting in Coastal Cameroon.
J Parasitol Res. 2019 Mar 10;2019:1417967. doi: 10.1155/2019/1417967. eCollection 2019.
5
7
An Alternative Method for Extracting DNA from EDTA Whole Blood for Malaria Diagnosis.
Korean J Parasitol. 2018 Feb;56(1):25-32. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2018.56.1.25. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
8
Molecular malaria diagnostics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2016;53(2):87-105. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2015.1084991. Epub 2015 Sep 17.
9
Malaria Diagnosis Across the International Centers of Excellence for Malaria Research: Platforms, Performance, and Standardization.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Sep;93(3 Suppl):99-109. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0004. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
10
Ultra-sensitive detection of Plasmodium falciparum by amplification of multi-copy subtelomeric targets.
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 3;12(3):e1001788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001788. eCollection 2015 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验