Division of Malaria Research, Institute for Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Department of Medical Research, Ministry of Health and Sports, Yangon, Myanmar.
Malar J. 2017 Sep 18;16(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2025-3.
BACKGROUND: Greater Mekong Subregion countries are committed to eliminating Plasmodium falciparum malaria by 2025. Current elimination interventions target infections at parasite densities that can be detected by standard microscopy or rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs). More sensitive detection methods have been developed to detect lower density "asymptomatic" infections that may represent an important transmission reservoir. These ultrasensitive polymerase chain reaction (usPCR) tests have been used to identify target populations for mass drug administration (MDA). To date, malaria usPCR tests have used either venous or capillary blood sampling, which entails complex sample collection, processing and shipping requirements. An ultrasensitive method performed on standard dried blood spots (DBS) would greatly facilitate the molecular surveillance studies needed for targeting elimination interventions. METHODS: A highly sensitive method for detecting Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax 18S ribosomal RNA from DBS was developed by empirically optimizing nucleic acid extraction conditions. The limit of detection (LoD) was determined using spiked DBS samples that were dried and stored under simulated field conditions. Further, to assess its utility for routine molecular surveillance, two cross-sectional surveys were performed in Myanmar during the wet and dry seasons. RESULTS: The lower LoD of the DBS-based ultrasensitive assay was 20 parasites/mL for DBS collected on Whatman 3MM filter paper and 23 parasites/mL for Whatman 903 Protein Saver cards-equivalent to 1 parasite per 50 µL DBS. This is about 5000-fold more sensitive than standard RDTs and similar to the LoD of ≤16-22 parasites/mL reported for other ultrasensitive methods based on whole blood. In two cross-sectional surveys in Myanmar, nearly identical prevalence estimates were obtained from contemporaneous DBS samples and capillary blood samples collected during the wet and dry season. CONCLUSIONS: The DBS-based ultrasensitive method described in this study shows equal sensitivity as previously described methods based on whole blood, both in its limit of detection and prevalence estimates in two field surveys. The reduced cost and complexity of this method will allow for the scale-up of surveillance studies to target MDA and other malaria elimination interventions, and help lead to a better understanding of the epidemiology of low-density malaria infections.
背景:大湄公河次区域国家致力于在 2025 年消除恶性疟原虫疟疾。目前消除疟疾的干预措施针对的是寄生虫密度,这些寄生虫密度可以通过标准显微镜或快速诊断检测(RDT)检测到。已经开发出更敏感的检测方法来检测密度较低的“无症状”感染,这些感染可能代表一个重要的传播储库。这些超灵敏聚合酶链反应(usPCR)检测已用于确定大规模药物治疗(MDA)的目标人群。迄今为止,疟疾 usPCR 检测一直使用静脉或毛细血管血样采集,这需要复杂的样本采集、处理和运输要求。在标准的干血斑(DBS)上进行超灵敏检测方法将极大地促进针对消除干预措施的分子监测研究。
方法:通过经验优化核酸提取条件,开发了一种从 DBS 中检测恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫 18S 核糖体 RNA 的超灵敏方法。使用在模拟野外条件下干燥和储存的加标 DBS 样本确定检测限(LoD)。此外,为了评估其在常规分子监测中的实用性,在缅甸的湿季和干季进行了两项横断面调查。
结果:基于 DBS 的超灵敏检测方法的下限 LoD 为在 Whatman 3MM 滤纸上采集的 DBS 为 20 个寄生虫/毫升,在 Whatman 903 蛋白保存卡上采集的 DBS 为 23 个寄生虫/毫升-相当于 50 µL DBS 中有 1 个寄生虫。这比标准 RDT 灵敏约 5000 倍,与其他基于全血的超灵敏方法报告的 ≤16-22 个寄生虫/毫升的 LoD 相似。在缅甸的两项横断面调查中,从同时采集的 DBS 样本和湿季和干季采集的毛细血管血样本中获得了几乎相同的患病率估计值。
结论:本研究中描述的基于 DBS 的超灵敏方法在其检测限和两项现场调查中的患病率估计值方面与以前基于全血的方法具有相同的灵敏度。这种方法的成本和复杂性降低将允许扩大监测研究范围,以针对 MDA 和其他疟疾消除干预措施,并有助于更好地了解低密度疟疾感染的流行病学。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025-8-19
Emerg Infect Dis. 2025-6
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023-9-27
Malar J. 2016-1-28
J Infect Dis. 2016-4-15