From the Department of Neuromuscular Research, National Institute of Neuroscience (J.T., M.I., Y.S., S.H., S.N., I.N.), Department of Genome Medicine Development, Medical Genome Center (J.T., M.I., Y.S., S.H., S.N., I.N.), and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Translational Medical Center (H.T.), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP); Endowed Course for Health System Innovation (H.T.), Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo; Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine (N.O.), University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki; and Department of Dermatology (M.F.), Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Japan.
Neurology. 2022 Feb 15;98(7):e739-e749. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013176. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Discoveries of dermatomyositis-specific antibodies (DMSAs) in patients with dermatomyositis raised awareness of various myopathologic features among antibody subtypes. However, only perifascicular atrophy and perifascicular myxovirus resistant protein A (MxA) overexpression were officially included as definitive pathologic criteria for dermatomyositis classification. We aimed to demonstrate myopathologic features in MxA-positive dermatomyositis to determine characteristic myopathologic features in different DMSA subtypes.
We performed a retrospective pathology review of muscle biopsies of patients with dermatomyositis diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2020 in a tertiary laboratory for muscle diseases. We included all muscle biopsies with sarcoplasmic expression for MxA and seropositivity for DMSAs. MxA-positive muscle biopsies that tested negative for all DMSAs were included as seronegative dermatomyositis. We evaluated histologic features stratified according to 4 pathology domains (muscle fiber, inflammatory, vascular, and connective tissue) and histologic features of interest by histochemistry, enzyme histochemistry, and immunohistochemical study commonly used in the diagnosis of inflammatory myopathy. We performed ultrastructural studies of 54 available specimens.
A total of 256 patients were included. Of these, 249 patients were positive for 1 of the 5 DMSAs (seropositive patients: 87 anti-transcription intermediary factor 1-γ [TIF1-γ], 40 anti-complex nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase [Mi-2], 29 anti-melanoma differentiation gene 5 [MDA5], 83 anti-nuclear matrix protein 2 [NXP-2], and 10 anti-small ubiquitin-like modifier-activating enzyme [SAE] dermatomyositis) and 7 patients were negative for all 5 DMSAs (seronegative patients). Characteristic myopathologic features in each DMSA subtype were as follows: anti-TIF1-γ with vacuolated/punched out fibers (64.7%; < 0.001) and perifascicular enhancement in HLA-ABC stain (75.9%; < 0.001); anti-Mi-2 with prominent muscle fiber damage (score 4.9 ± 2.1; < 0.001), inflammatory cell infiltration (score 8.0 ± 3.0; = 0.002), perifascicular atrophy (67.5%; = 0.02), perifascicular necrosis (52.5%; < 0.001), increased perimysial alkaline phosphatase activity (70.0%; < 0.001), central necrotic peripheral regenerating fibers (45.0%; = 0.002), and sarcolemmal membrane attack complex deposition (67.5%; < 0.001); anti-MDA5 with scattered/diffuse staining pattern of MxA (65.5%; < 0.001) with less muscle pathology and inflammatory features; anti-NXP-2 with microinfarction (26.5%; < 0.001); and anti-SAE and seronegative dermatomyositis with HLA-DR expression (50.0%; = 0.02 and 57.1%; = 0.02, respectively).
We describe a comprehensive serologic-pathologic correlation of dermatomyositis primarily using MxA expression as an inclusion criterion. In our study, DMSAs were associated with distinctive myopathologic features suggesting different underlying pathobiologic mechanisms in each subtype.
皮肌炎特异性抗体(DMSAs)在皮肌炎患者中的发现提高了人们对各种肌病特征的认识,这些特征存在于不同的抗体亚型中。然而,只有束周萎缩和束周肌浆抵抗蛋白 A(MxA)过表达被正式纳入皮肌炎分类的明确病理标准。我们旨在证明 MxA 阳性皮肌炎中的肌病特征,以确定不同 DMSA 亚型的特征性肌病特征。
我们对 2009 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在一家肌肉疾病三级实验室进行的皮肌炎患者的肌肉活检进行了回顾性病理检查。我们纳入了所有肌浆表达 MxA 和 DMSAs 血清阳性的肌肉活检。MxA 阳性且所有 DMSAs 检测均为阴性的肌肉活检被纳入血清阴性皮肌炎。我们根据 4 个病理学领域(肌纤维、炎症、血管和结缔组织)和常用的炎症性肌病诊断的组织化学、酶组织化学和免疫组织化学研究评估组织学特征。我们对 54 个可用标本进行了超微结构研究。
共纳入 256 例患者。其中,249 例患者为 5 种 DMSAs 中的 1 种阳性(血清阳性患者:87 例抗转录中介因子 1-γ [TIF1-γ]、40 例抗复合物核小体重塑组蛋白去乙酰化酶 [Mi-2]、29 例抗黑素瘤分化基因 5 [MDA5]、83 例抗核基质蛋白 2 [NXP-2]和 10 例抗小泛素样修饰酶激活酶 [SAE]皮肌炎),7 例患者为 5 种 DMSAs 均阴性(血清阴性患者)。每个 DMSA 亚型的特征性肌病特征如下:抗-TIF1-γ 有空泡/打孔纤维(64.7%;<0.001)和 HLA-ABC 染色的束周增强(75.9%;<0.001);抗-Mi-2 具有明显的肌纤维损伤(评分 4.9±2.1;<0.001)、炎症细胞浸润(评分 8.0±3.0;=0.002)、束周萎缩(67.5%;=0.02)、束周坏死(52.5%;<0.001)、肌周碱性磷酸酶活性增加(70.0%;<0.001)、中央坏死周围再生纤维(45.0%;=0.002)和肌膜攻击复合物沉积(67.5%;<0.001);抗-MDA5 具有散在/弥漫的 MxA 染色模式(65.5%;<0.001),肌病和炎症特征较少;抗-NXP-2 具有微梗死(26.5%;<0.001);抗-SAE 和血清阴性皮肌炎具有 HLA-DR 表达(50.0%;=0.02 和 57.1%;=0.02)。
我们描述了皮肌炎主要使用 MxA 表达作为纳入标准的全面血清-病理相关性。在我们的研究中,DMSAs 与独特的肌病特征相关,提示每个亚型存在不同的潜在病理生物学机制。