Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Addiction. 2022 Jun;117(6):1781-1786. doi: 10.1111/add.15778. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
To prevent COVID-19 transmission, some United States (US) federal regulations on substance use disorder (SUD) treatment were suspended in March 2020. This study aimed to quantify the extent of state-level policy uptake and the potential number of people with SUD affected by these policy changes across the US, as well as to assess if policy uptake correlated with rates of people with SUD already in treatment or needing treatment.
Cross-sectional analysis of policies implemented as of April 13, 2020.
A total of 50 US states and the District of Columbia MEASUREMENTS: State-level implementation of: oral schedule II controlled substances emergency prescription, extended take-home doses for medication for opioid use disorders (MOUD), home-delivery of take-home medications, telemedicine for schedule II-IV prescriptions, telemedicine for buprenorphine prescribing initiation, and waiver of out-of-state Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) registration. Rates per 100 000 population of: adults in treatment for SUD, MOUD treatment at facilities with opioid treatment programs, SUD based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-IV criteria, and needing, but not receiving treatment.
Half of the states (n = 24) enacted no policies, leaving ~460 955 people in treatment and 114 370 people on MOUD pre-pandemic uncovered by any policy expansion. Only telemedicine for buprenorphine initiation was marginally associated with pre-pandemic rate of SUD treatment (OR = 1.003, 95% CI = [1.001, 1.006]) and rate of MOUD therapy (OR = 1.006, 95% CI = [1.002, 1.011]) in univariable analysis, but these associations were no longer significant when controlling for state-level demographics. No policies were associated with state-wide SUD prevalence or rate of unmet treatment need (P > 0.05).
Twenty-four United States states did not implement at least one federal policy for substance use disorder treatment expansion as of April 2020, leaving approximately half a million people in treatment pre-pandemic potentially without access to treatment or risking exposure to COVID-19 to continue in-person therapies.
为了防止 COVID-19 的传播,美国(美国)一些关于物质使用障碍(SUD)治疗的联邦法规于 2020 年 3 月暂停。本研究旨在量化各州政策实施的程度,以及这些政策变化对美国各地 SUD 患者的潜在影响人数,以及评估政策实施是否与已经接受治疗或需要治疗的 SUD 患者的比率相关。
截至 2020 年 4 月 13 日实施政策的横断面分析。
美国共 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区。
州级实施:口服 II 类管制物质紧急处方、阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物的延长居家剂量、居家送药、II-IV 类处方的远程医疗、丁丙诺啡处方启动的远程医疗和境外缉毒局(DEA)注册豁免。每 10 万人的比率:接受 SUD 治疗的成年人、具有阿片类药物治疗计划的设施中的 MOUD 治疗、根据精神障碍诊断和统计手册(DSM-IV)标准的 SUD 和需要但未接受治疗。
一半的州(n=24)没有制定任何政策,使大约 460955 名接受治疗的人和 114370 名接受 MOUD 治疗的人在大流行前未被任何政策扩大所涵盖。只有丁丙诺啡的远程医疗启动与大流行前 SUD 治疗率(OR=1.003,95%CI=1.001,1.006)和 MOUD 治疗率(OR=1.006,95%CI=1.002,1.011)呈轻度相关在单变量分析中,但当控制州级人口统计学因素时,这些关联不再显著。没有政策与全州 SUD 患病率或未满足的治疗需求率相关(P>0.05)。
截至 2020 年 4 月,美国 24 个州没有实施至少一项扩大物质使用障碍治疗的联邦政策,使大约 50 万名大流行前接受治疗的人可能无法获得治疗或冒着接触 COVID-19 的风险继续接受面对面治疗。