Suppr超能文献

阿片类物质使用障碍及共病多种物质使用中丁丙诺啡与纳曲酮的疗效比较。

Comparative Effectiveness Associated With Buprenorphine and Naltrexone in Opioid Use Disorder and Cooccurring Polysubstance Use.

机构信息

Health and Behavior Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Barnes Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211363. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11363.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Despite prevalent polysubstance use, treatment patterns and outcomes for individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) and cooccurring substance use disorders (SUD) are understudied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the distribution of buprenorphine and naltrexone initiation among individuals with OUD with vs without cooccurring SUD and to assess the comparative effectiveness associated with buprenorphine and naltrexone against drug-related poisonings.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational comparative effectiveness study used insurance claims from 2011 to 2016 from the US IBM MarketScan databases to study initiation of medications for OUD (MOUD) among treatment-seeking individuals aged 12 to 64 years with a primary diagnosis of OUD. Cooccurring SUD was defined as SUD diagnosed concurrent with or in the 6 months prior to OUD treatment initiation. Treatment was codified as psychosocial treatment without MOUD or initiation or buprenorphine or naltrexone (including extended-release or oral). Methadone recipients were excluded from analysis. Data were analyzed from February 3, 2021, through February 26, 2022.

EXPOSURES

MOUD.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Associations between cooccurring SUD diagnoses with treatment type were assessed with multivariable regression. The association of drug-related poisoning admissions with days covered with buprenorphine or naltrexone prescriptions vs days without prescriptions was assessed among MOUD initiators. Odds ratios from within-person fixed effects models were estimated as a function of MOUD and stratified by cooccurring SUDs.

RESULTS

Among 179 280 individuals with OUD (mean [SD] age, 33.2 [11.0] years; 90 196 [50.5%] men), 102 930 (57.4%) received psychosocial treatment without MOUD. Across 47 488 individuals with cooccurring SUDs, 33 449 (70.4%) did not receive MOUD, whereas across 131 792 individuals without cooccurring SUDs, 69 481 (52.7%) did not receive MOUD. Cooccurring SUD was associated with decreased odds of initiating buprenorphine (risk ratio [RR], 0.55 [95% CI, 0.54-0.56]) but increased odds of initiating naltrexone (extended release: RR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05-1.20]; oral: RR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.86-2.03]). Among 12 485 individuals initiating MOUD who experienced at least 1 drug-related poisoning during insurance enrollment, buprenorphine treatment days were associated with decreased poisonings compared with days without MOUD for individuals with cooccurring SUD (odds ratio [OR], 0.56 [95% CI, 0.48-0.65]) and individuals without cooccurring SUD (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.53-0.63]), with comparable associations observed for extended-release naltrexone. No protective association was observed for oral naltrexone.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that individuals with OUD and polysubstance use were less likely to initiate buprenorphine and naltrexone than individuals without polysubstance use. Among individuals initiating MOUD, polysubstance use was associated with decreased buprenorphine and increased naltrexone initiation, despite buprenorphine's protective associations against drug-related poisoning.

摘要

重要性

尽管普遍存在多种物质使用,但针对阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)和共病物质使用障碍(SUD)患者的治疗模式和结果仍研究不足。

目的

评估 OUD 患者与共病 SUD 患者之间丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮起始治疗的分布情况,并评估丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮治疗与药物相关中毒的相对疗效。

设计、设置和参与者:本观察性比较有效性研究使用了 2011 年至 2016 年来自美国 IBM MarketScan 数据库的保险索赔数据,研究了 12 至 64 岁有 OUD 主要诊断的接受治疗的个体中治疗 OUD 的药物(MOUD)的起始情况。共病 SUD 的定义为与 OUD 治疗起始同时或在其之前 6 个月内诊断出的 SUD。治疗编码为不包括 MOUD 或丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮(包括缓释或口服)的心理社会治疗。排除接受美沙酮治疗的患者进行分析。数据分析于 2022 年 2 月 3 日至 2022 年 2 月 26 日进行。

暴露因素

MOUD。

主要结局和测量

使用多变量回归评估共病 SUD 诊断与治疗类型之间的关联。在 MOUD 起始者中,评估了与药物相关中毒入院相关的丁丙诺啡或纳曲酮处方天数与无处方天数之间的关联。使用个体内固定效应模型估算了作为 MOUD 函数的比值比,并按共病 SUD 分层。

结果

在 179280 名 OUD 患者(平均[SD]年龄,33.2[11.0]岁;90196[50.5%]为男性)中,102930(57.4%)接受了无 MOUD 的心理社会治疗。在 47488 名共病 SUD 患者中,33449(70.4%)未接受 MOUD,而在 131792 名无共病 SUD 患者中,69481(52.7%)未接受 MOUD。共病 SUD 与丁丙诺啡起始治疗的可能性降低相关(风险比[RR],0.55[95%CI,0.54-0.56]),但与纳曲酮起始治疗的可能性增加相关(延长释放:RR,1.12[95%CI,1.05-1.20];口服:RR,1.95[95%CI,1.86-2.03])。在 12485 名经历过至少 1 次保险期间药物相关中毒的 MOUD 起始者中,与无 MOUD 相比,丁丙诺啡治疗天数与共病 SUD 患者(比值比[OR],0.56[95%CI,0.48-0.65])和无共病 SUD 患者(OR,0.57[95%CI,0.53-0.63])的中毒减少相关,对于延长释放的纳曲酮也观察到类似的关联。对于口服纳曲酮,未观察到保护关联。

结论和相关性

这些发现表明,与无多种物质使用的个体相比,OUD 和多种物质使用的个体更不可能开始使用丁丙诺啡和纳曲酮。在开始 MOUD 的个体中,尽管丁丙诺啡与药物相关中毒的保护关联,但共病 SUD 与丁丙诺啡的使用减少和纳曲酮的使用增加相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d009/9092203/31e5c4560eda/jamanetwopen-e2211363-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验