• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卒中后癫痫发作风险预测模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Post-stroke seizure risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Academic Critical Care & Neurosurgery, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian.

Department of Psychiatry, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust.

出版信息

Epileptic Disord. 2022 Apr 1;24(2):302-314. doi: 10.1684/epd.2021.1391.

DOI:10.1684/epd.2021.1391
PMID:34874273
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stroke is the commonest cause of epileptic seizures in older adults. Risk factors for post-stroke seizure (PSS) are well known, however, predicting PSS risk is clinically challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive accuracy of PSS risk prediction models developed to date.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using MEDLINE and EMBASE from database inception to 28 December 2020. The search criteria included all peer-reviewed research articles, in which PSS risk prediction models were developed or validated for ischaemic and/or haemorrhagic stroke. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate summary statistics of model performance and receiver operating characteristic curves. Quality appraisal of studies was conducted using PROBAST.

RESULTS

Thirteen original studies involving 182,673 stroke patients (mean age: 38-74.9 years; 29.4-60.9% males), reporting 15 PSS risk prediction models were included. The incidence of early PSS (occurring ≤one week from stroke onset) and late PSS (occurring >one week from stroke onset) was 4.5% and 2.1%, respectively. Cortical involvement, functional deficits, increasing lesion size, early seizures, younger age, and haemorrhage were the commonest predictors across the models. SeLECT demonstrated greatest predictive accuracy (AUC 0.77 [95% CI: 0.71-0.82]) for late PSS following ischaemic stroke, and CAVE for predicting late PSS following haemorrhagic stroke (AUC 0.81 [0.76-0.86]). Fourteen of 15 studies demonstrated a high risk of bias, with lack of model validation and reporting of performance measures on calibration and discrimination being the commonest reasons.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although risk factors for PSS are widely documented, this review identified few multivariate models with low risk of bias, synthetising single variables into an individual prediction of seizure risk. Such models may help personalise clinical management and serve as useful research tools by identifying stroke patients at high risk of developing PSS for recruitment into studies of anti-epileptic drug prophylaxis.

摘要

目的

中风是老年人癫痫发作最常见的原因。中风后癫痫发作(PSS)的危险因素众所周知,但预测 PSS 风险在临床上具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估迄今为止开发的 PSS 风险预测模型的预测准确性。

方法

我们对从数据库建立到 2020 年 12 月 28 日使用 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 进行的研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。搜索标准包括所有同行评审的研究文章,其中开发或验证了缺血性和/或出血性中风的 PSS 风险预测模型。使用随机效应荟萃分析生成模型性能的汇总统计数据和接收者操作特征曲线。使用 PROBAST 对研究进行质量评估。

结果

共纳入 13 项原始研究,涉及 182673 例中风患者(平均年龄:38-74.9 岁;男性占 29.4-60.9%),报告了 15 个 PSS 风险预测模型。早期 PSS(中风发作后≤1 周发生)和晚期 PSS(中风发作后>1 周发生)的发生率分别为 4.5%和 2.1%。皮质受累、功能缺陷、病变增大、早期发作、年龄较小和出血是各模型中最常见的预测因素。SELECT 模型对缺血性中风后晚期 PSS 的预测准确性最高(AUC 0.77[95%CI:0.71-0.82]),CAVE 模型对出血性中风后晚期 PSS 的预测准确性最高(AUC 0.81[0.76-0.86])。15 项研究中有 14 项存在高偏倚风险,缺乏模型验证和报告校准和区分性能的措施是最常见的原因。

意义

尽管 PSS 的危险因素已广泛记录,但本综述发现很少有低偏倚风险的多变量模型,将单一变量综合成个体癫痫发作风险预测。这些模型可以通过识别出发生 PSS 风险较高的中风患者,将其纳入抗癫痫药物预防研究中,从而帮助进行个体化临床管理,并作为有用的研究工具。

相似文献

1
Post-stroke seizure risk prediction models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.卒中后癫痫发作风险预测模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epileptic Disord. 2022 Apr 1;24(2):302-314. doi: 10.1684/epd.2021.1391.
2
Prediction of late seizures after ischaemic stroke with a novel prognostic model (the SeLECT score): a multivariable prediction model development and validation study.新型预后模型(SELECT 评分)预测缺血性脑卒中后迟发性癫痫:多变量预测模型的开发和验证研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Feb;17(2):143-152. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30404-0.
3
Poststroke seizure: optimising its management.卒中后癫痫:优化其管理
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Dec 9;4(1):48-56. doi: 10.1136/svn-2018-000175. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Statin use and the risk of post-stroke seizures: A meta-analysis.他汀类药物的使用与卒中后癫痫发作的风险:一项荟萃分析。
Seizure. 2020 Dec;83:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
5
Risk models to predict late-onset seizures after stroke: A systematic review.卒中后迟发性癫痫的风险预测模型:系统评价。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Aug;121(Pt A):108003. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108003. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with post-stroke epilepsy: protocol for an individual patient data meta-analysis from the International Post-stroke Epilepsy Research Repository (IPSERR).卒中后癫痫患者的临床特征和结局:来自国际卒中后癫痫研究资料库(IPSERR)的个体患者数据荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 15;13(11):e078684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078684.
7
Efficacy of Statin therapy in post-stroke seizure prophylaxis: Clues from an observational study of routine secondary prevention treatment.他汀类药物治疗在卒中后预防发作中的疗效:来自常规二级预防治疗的观察性研究的线索。
Seizure. 2019 Oct;71:185-189. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
8
Outcomes in Patients With Poststroke Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.脑卒中后癫痫患者的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2023 Nov 1;80(11):1155-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3240.
9
Seizure Outcomes and Predictors of Recurrent Post-Stroke Seizure: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.卒中后癫痫发作的结局及复发预测因素:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 26;10(8):e0136200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136200. eCollection 2015.
10
Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.利用临床、生化和超声标志物预测子痫前期的模型的验证和建立:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Dec;24(72):1-252. doi: 10.3310/hta24720.

引用本文的文献

1
An automatic deep-learning approach for the prediction of post-stroke epilepsy after an initial intracerebral hemorrhage based on non-contrast computed tomography imaging.一种基于非增强计算机断层扫描成像的自动深度学习方法,用于预测初次脑出血后中风后癫痫。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):1175-1189. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1345. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Risk factors of posthemorrhagic seizure in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.自发性脑出血后出血后癫痫发作的危险因素。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Jan 23;48(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03229-2.
3
Insights into risk factors and outcomes of post-stroke seizures in Saudi Arabia: a multicenter analysis.
沙特阿拉伯中风后癫痫发作的风险因素及预后分析:一项多中心研究
Metab Brain Dis. 2024 Dec 19;40(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s11011-024-01508-3.
4
Clinical approaches for poststroke seizure: a review.中风后癫痫的临床治疗方法:综述
Front Neurol. 2024 Apr 10;15:1337960. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1337960. eCollection 2024.
5
Epilepsy and epileptiform activity in late-onset Alzheimer disease: clinical and pathophysiological advances, gaps and conundrums.迟发性阿尔茨海默病中的癫痫和癫痫样活动:临床和病理生理学的进展、差距和难题。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Mar;20(3):162-182. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-00932-4. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
6
Recurrent cerebellar ischemic infarctions and stereotyped peri-ictal sympathetic responses in a near-SUDEP patient with cardiovascular risk factors.一名有心血管危险因素的接近SUDEP患者出现复发性小脑缺血性梗死和刻板的发作期周围交感神经反应。
Epilepsy Behav Rep. 2023 May 11;23:100605. doi: 10.1016/j.ebr.2023.100605. eCollection 2023.
7
Epileptiform activity in the acute phase of stroke predicts the outcomes in patients without seizures.中风急性期的癫痫样活动可预测无癫痫发作患者的预后。
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 13;14:1096876. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1096876. eCollection 2023.
8
Clinical Biomarkers and Prediction Models for Poststroke Epilepsy: Have We Settled the Scores Yet?中风后癫痫的临床生物标志物和预测模型:我们解决问题了吗?
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Apr;13(2):e200146. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200146. Epub 2023 Mar 14.